Ohio states j t Barrett has accounted for 100 touchdowns in his college career. It would be fair to say that most of those came against inferior opponents. Are those " padded" stats also ?He padded his stats on a superior team against inferior opponents .... how many major bowl wins .... zero .... what was Kelly's record with him against top ten teams .... god awful
I believe he was 23-8 as a starter. How awfulOne of the worst starting QB in the last 30 years is the new QB coach. Great job Kelly.
Ohio states j t Barrett has accounted for 100 touchdowns in his college career. It would be fair to say that most of those came against inferior opponents. Are those " padded" stats also ?
My discarded toenail clippings possess more football knowledge than you ll ever hope to acquire in a lifetime.
Tools or not he IS one of the top QBs in the ND record books. Give me a guy with heart and no tools over a guy with tools and no heart every day of the week.Tommy was never one of my favorite players because I felt that he just did not have the physical
tools to be a top Quarterback.
However, Let's give him a chance as a coach ! Who knows ? Maybe, he will one day be a top head coach here ar ND ?
So in your small,uninformed mind when do stats "count" ?The fact you have to ask is telling .... but IMO yes .... the Big 10 is mostly garbage
Truth hurts on occasion.I expect this type of opinion from someone who posts like you do .....
Comparing statistics as pertains to the discussion. Not my buddy as I be never met him. You are as entitled to your opinion as am I. At least I have hard facts supporting mine.jt Barrett is who u're comparing rees to? Just ftr, he's not that good either but he won big games unlike your buddy rees. Enough w/ the rees loving, it's ridiculous that we have to argue the fact. All that thought he was even average have low, low standards. Whatever his record was would've been much better w/ the talent surrounding him had he been any good. Playing and/or coaching doesn't give you any credibility if you're trying to convince anyone that rees was even average. He wasn't, and watching the games he played proves that. A 23-8 record w/ that team sucks, btw.
Never said he was better than anyone based on statistics alone. Given the skill set and level of expectation entering Notre dame I d say he did more with less than many other players who did much less with more. Never said he was great but he was nowhere as bad as some portray him here.What hard facts? Stats? Rees has more ND records than Montana, correct? So w/ your "hard facts" approach to the discussion, he must've been better, correct?
I have hard facts too, echo. I watched the games, and he held that team back. If you don't think so, I urge you to rewatch the games.
Your opinion is not a fact. Check Webster.What hard facts? Stats? Rees has more ND records than Montana, correct? So w/ your "hard facts" approach to the discussion, he must've been better, correct?
I have hard facts too, echo. I watched the games, and he held that team back. If you don't think so, I urge you to rewatch the games.
Comparing statistics as pertains to the discussion. Not my buddy as I be never met him. You are as entitled to your opinion as am I. At least I have hard facts supporting mine.
Never said he was better than anyone based on statistics alone. Given the skill set and level of expectation entering Notre dame I d say he did more with less than many other players who did much less with more. Never said he was great but he was nowhere as bad as some portray him here.
So in your small,uninformed mind when do stats "count" ?
Wrong again. Shocking.You clearly exhibit zero abiltity to analyze football beyond a stat sheet
Be glad to debate you anytime on any football related subject you choose. For me that would be like fishing at Sea World or hunting at the zoo. Very little if any challenge.You clearly exhibit zero abiltity to analyze football beyond a stat sheet
Wrong again. Shocking.
Be glad to debate you anytime on any football related subject you choose. For me that would be like fishing at Sea World or hunting at the zoo. Very little if any challenge.
All supported by facts. Yes Rees was an above average qb in his time. Yes Brian Kelly is a good coach. One losing season at nd doesn't t change that. I like facts not opinion.Let's see ... Tommy Rees was a good QB ... Brian Kelly is a good coach .... oh yeah .... you really know what you're talking about
All supported by facts. Yes Rees was an above average qb in his time. Yes Brian Kelly is a good coach. One losing season at nd doesn't t change that. I like facts not opinion.
You clearly dodged the question. Do you completely disregard statistics altogether ?You call them facts when they are actually stats .... stats don't tell all the facts .... like the difference between a QB who gets credited for an int when he hit the receiver in the hands and it when thru his hands bounced off a player and was caught by a db ... vs. .... throwing an int because the ball was so poorly underthrown .... or getting credit for a TD by throwing a perfect strike down the sideline to a wr on a go route ... vs. ... getting credit for a TD by throwing a jump ball .... underthrown .... to Michael Floyd who just goes up and gets it
Stats vs. facts ..... you call yourself a coach? .... there is more than one fraud in the clown show
Stats are facts. Of course there are variables. A qb gets credit for an 80 yd TD pass on a screen. Nothing is absolute. They are an indicator of performance.You call them facts when they are actually stats .... stats don't tell all the facts .... like the difference between a QB who gets credited for an int when he hit the receiver in the hands and it when thru his hands bounced off a player and was caught by a db ... vs. .... throwing an int because the ball was so poorly underthrown .... or getting credit for a TD by throwing a perfect strike down the sideline to a wr on a go route ... vs. ... getting credit for a TD by throwing a jump ball .... underthrown .... to Michael Floyd who just goes up and gets it
Stats vs. facts ..... you call yourself a coach? .... there is more than one fraud in the clown show
Please enlighten me on your football pedigree. I ll take mine against almost anyone. I know plenty about qb play. Rees was productive in his time at Notre dame. He helped his team win a lot of games and he was a contributor in some of their losses also. Its the ultimate team game. He got the most out of his limited ability. What more did you want from him ?My facts are the games themselves. Watch them again and you'll see what I mean. Ur "facts" are stats. U're a typical coach. Stat geek. I will put my football knowledge up against you any day of the week, btw. Anyone that thinks rees was an above average qb either has very low standards, doesn't know shit about the qb position or is his buddy. U said u don't know him, so take your pick.
If I submit an analysis will you print it and take it with you to show your imaginary staff? .... it is self explanatory to anyone with half a brain
BTW ... I saw the game today ....did you see the last possession .... game tied.... did you see the clear out with a high pick and roll .... How did I know that was coming? .... 17 years and counting .... they didn't even try to get the ball to their best option Beachem .... god forbid you call a TO and set something up .... the guys couldn't pull it out on their own today .... Brey is trash
You have no credibility if you think Kelly is a good coach. Good coaches dont go 4-8 after 7 seasons on the job. Good coaches dont blame everyone but themselves for their failures.All supported by facts. Yes Rees was an above average qb in his time. Yes Brian Kelly is a good coach. One losing season at nd doesn't t change that. I like facts not opinion.
I did not see the game yesterday. Didn't need to. Had the shot gone in it was the players winning despite the coach. The fact that it didn't allows you to blame Brey. He was screwed no matter what. I wouldn't call TO either....the fact that you would makes me know I am correct!
Me and my imaginary staff have work every Saturday afternoon as well as Wednesday nites. In fact I just came from my imaginary gym with my imaginary team and I had to meet with my imaginary trainer who told me one of my imaginary players has to go thru concussion protocol.
So why don't you explain this awesome play that you would have drawn up to win yesterdays game...just like the ob play that you can't describe...just like that zone offense you couldn't describe...just like the coaching tree thing you can't describe...
BTW...I did catch the end of the Villanova/UVA game...no time-out...run your offense( HIGH- SCREEN AND ROLL) and get a tip-in to win at the buzzer. So Jay Wright doesn't call time-out...I guess he is trash as well.
Stats are facts. Of course there are variables. A qb gets credit for an 80 yd TD pass on a screen. Nothing is absolute. They are an indicator of performance.
You clearly dodged the question. Do you completely disregard statistics altogether ?
What hard facts? Stats? Rees has more ND records than Montana, correct? So w/ your "hard facts" approach to the discussion, he must've been better, correct?
I have hard facts too, echo. I watched the games, and he held that team back. If you don't think so, I urge you to rewatch the games.
I didn't see last nites game either asshole...know why? Because I had practice...I know you don't know what practice is seeing you and your U12 girls just show up on Sundays for the game...but at the college level we have what is known as semester break...and our students started classes yesterday and I the women had the 5-7 practice slot....as far as the concussion deal one of my players got dinged on Saturday...you do know that many colleges play games on Saturday. I believe I asked for the awesome play you were gonna run at the end of the game....and of course you back-pedal and bring up some shit no one knows what the f..k you are talking about....someone has a family member die...chseahawk26...and you make fun of it? You truly are a piece of rat filth...