I wasn't even referring to it being in bad taste. I was referring to evidence. In the OJ case, there were truck loads of it. Box after box full of evidence. DNA, blood, hair, clothing, 2 murdered bodies, etc. In the Winston situation, there is literally not one piece of evidence that an assault even took place.Originally posted by SALittleGiant513:
C'mon Nole I think there are a ton of Jim Crow cases out there that would give the OJ verdict a run for biggest flaw. Innocence project has some really bad convictions overturned too. I agree comparing JW to OJ is in bad taste however but then again it is DUBS FELLA.
This is why I called the comparison stupid.