ADVERTISEMENT

OT: What is happening at Fox News?

So it's not really Fox's programs that are the problem just the stupid people who don't know it's news? And you know they are stupid because they think differently from you. Correct? And they also lose there ability to reason. Correct?

Or do you think how that are overtly opinion shows (O'Riely, The Five,Tucker...etc) should not give opinions?
 
John Podesta wrote in one of his emails that was released thru Wikileaks that what is needed for their policies ( transformation ) to succeed was a " more compliant population " ie people who do what the govt ( democratic party/ media ) tells them to do or think without questioning or dissenting. These guys on this board like Quest, Granite, SeanPol and many others are very " compliant" . They are the " ideal citizenry " . They follow the Script well. The irony and absurdity is they accuse the people who don't share their political views as being dumb sheep . Not realizing due to their blindness and arrogance that they're already a member of the " flock".
 
  • Like
Reactions: rgc7 and Bodizephax
Unlike CNN which was exposed

You actually understand very little. You find Fox intolerable bc it doesn't March in lock step with the rest of the MSM and sing from the same left wing hymnal that you like to listen to. A left wing media that abandoned any pretense of professionalism and journalistic integrity with the past election. CNN giving debate questions to HRC prior to a debate with Bernie Sanders. Some Writers at the NYT and Politico submitting their stories prior to publishing articles on HRC to her campaign for editing and approval. The Clinton campaign was enabled by a corrupt media to write their own articles in the press under the guise of them being authored by a supposed independent journalist. That is " Fake News". This was established through the Wikileaks email hack of John Podesta. All of which were verified and unchallenged as to their authenticity. We also learned that scores of CNN, MSNBC, ABC , CBS and other " independent journalists" went to Hillary Clinton s campaign mgr, John Podesta s home regularly for cocktails and dinner parties. Whose campaign he was managing they were " objectivley" reporting on. Come on you liberal hacks on this board who talk out of rear ends about Faux News and Trump's tweets against the media coverage of him. Almost half of the contributors to Fox News were Never Trumpers. Krauthammer, Brit Hume, Peter Hayes, Megan Kelley, George Will etc... . Was there one single pro Trump contributor on CNN or MSNBC ? Nope not 1! Yup Fox is a sham unlike the rest of the objective professional " News" media.
So many inaccuracies in your post. Party over country for you, eh? We'll just see what comes out of this Russia stuff comrade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mirer03
So it's not really Fox's programs that are the problem just the stupid people who don't know it's news? And you know they are stupid because they think differently from you. Correct? And they also lose there ability to reason. Correct?

Or do you think how that are overtly opinion shows (O'Riely, The Five,Tucker...etc) should not give opinions?
Beach you're a good guy so don't really want to go back and forth with you. Honestly I don't have a clue what you're trying to say in your reply.
 
Beach you're a good guy so don't really want to go back and forth with you. Honestly I don't have a clue what you're trying to say in your reply.

I am sure you are a good guy as well. Let me help:
Problem with Faux is too many of their shows are opinion and 98% of the viewers take it as hard news.(It sounds like you are saying they are too stupid to tell the difference) I understand it's an entertainment channel but when you only watch that channel you end up becoming a sheep.( You become sheep so lose your ability to reason, you just follow the flock.)
Hope that helps.
 
So many inaccuracies in your post. Party over country for you, eh? We'll just see what comes out of this Russia stuff comrade.
So many inaccuracies? Name one. Typical non responsive response from you... Pathetic as usual. America first for me. Not party over country. Go back to your safe space. Your buddies the Clintons under Saint Hilliarys tenure as Sec of State had the state dept authorize the sale of 20% of this country's uranium supply to Putin s Russia in exchange for some hefty speaking fees for Billy boy in Moscow. For the Clinton s it's always $$$ over country . And your buddy Podesta owned a large equity position in a Russian govt controlled Russian co.until just before the last campaign. He transferred his shares to his brother prior to becoming HRC s campaign manager. His brother still has ownership in that co. The plot thickens... OK Comrade! I suppose bc your ignorant or unwilling to accept the facts that those are all " inaccuracies " as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rgc7 and Bodizephax
I am sure you are a good guy as well. Let me help:
Problem with Faux is too many of their shows are opinion and 98% of the viewers take it as hard news.(It sounds like you are saying they are too stupid to tell the difference) I understand it's an entertainment channel but when you only watch that channel you end up becoming a sheep.( You become sheep so lose your ability to reason, you just follow the flock.)
Hope that helps.
Ok..

Do you only watch Fox News Beach? If not, I'm not sure why you're acting insulted? You seem pretty intelligent so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.
 
Unlike CNN which was exposed

You actually understand very little. You find Fox intolerable bc it doesn't March in lock step with the rest of the MSM and sing from the same left wing hymnal that you like to listen to. A left wing media that abandoned any pretense of professionalism and journalistic integrity with the past election. CNN giving debate questions to HRC prior to a debate with Bernie Sanders. Some Writers at the NYT and Politico submitting their stories prior to publishing articles on HRC to her campaign for editing and approval. The Clinton campaign was enabled by a corrupt media to write their own articles in the press under the guise of them being authored by a supposed independent journalist. That is " Fake News". This was established through the Wikileaks email hack of John Podesta. All of which were verified and unchallenged as to their authenticity. We also learned that scores of CNN, MSNBC, ABC , CBS and other " independent journalists" went to Hillary Clinton s campaign mgr, John Podesta s home regularly for cocktails and dinner parties. Whose campaign he was managing they were " objectivley" reporting on. Come on you liberal hacks on this board who talk out of rear ends about Faux News and Trump's tweets against the media coverage of him. Almost half of the contributors to Fox News were Never Trumpers. Krauthammer, Brit Hume, Peter Hayes, Megan Kelley, George Will etc... . Was there one single pro Trump contributor on CNN or MSNBC ? Nope not 1! Yup Fox is a sham unlike the rest of the objective professional " News" media.
Opinion
Incorrect
Opinion

There you go.
 
Ok..

Do you only watch Fox News Beach? If not, I'm not sure why you're acting insulted? You seem pretty intelligent so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.

I wasn't personally insulted at all. I just think your statement was transparently wrong. I have no idea why anyone would assume all those who follow fox primarily cannot tell opinion from news and are sheep. Seems like a pretty foolish statement to me. Just my opinion and not implying you are foolish, but the statement was.

Part of this is just my beleif regarding disclosure. Calling people sheep to me is like saying, libard, OJU, Netter Dumb and other childish remarks.

I doubt anyone is "only" watching any one network. But I live in California so I have no trouble getting the liberal viewpoint.

Thanks for the benefit of the doubt though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rgc7 and Bodizephax
I doubt anyone is "only" watching any one network. But I live in California so I have no trouble getting the liberal viewpoint.

Certainly, some posters have commented that they only watch 1 network, most commonly I have seen posters stating they only watch Fox.
 
Certainly, some posters have commented that they only watch 1 network, most commonly I have seen posters stating they only watch Fox.
And that would be unpardonable ! That would naturally make them incapable of reason or critical thinking as a result. If only they read the NYT then they would be capable of reasoned thought. That explains everything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bodizephax and rgc7
I enjoy reading Dumblin's posts. He claims to be an independent thinker yet each and every one of his so-called posts read like alt-right talking points. Sad.

But I will give him credit for his entertaining style of insults, factoids and deflections.

The biggest threat to America are the people who believe the lies they tell.

PS. Dumblin. I dislike limousine liberals as much as I dislike red meat conservatives. You guys are two sides of the same coin. You guys are experts are telling people what and how to think and act. Tin foil hats are a good fit for both groups.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Quest4Twelve
New documents obtained through Freedom of the Press Foundation’s lawsuit against the Justice Department reveal that the Obama administration - the self described “most transparent administration ever” - aggressively lobbied behind the scenes in 2014 to kill modest Freedom of Information Act reform that had virtually unanimous support in Congress.
 
How's your hometown? Good community organizers there! Yesterday marked the most violent day of 2017 for folks living in Chicago as the city recorded at least 13 shootings and 7 homicides. According to the Chicago Tribune[4], five of the victims were killed over just a two hour period, including a woman who was eight months pregnant. Meanwhile, the violent Wednesday night brought total shootings for the year to 495 with 99 homicides.
 
You can move to France!

As French voters look set to make a massive swing to the right in their upcoming presidential election (see our notes on the topic here[4] and here [5]), a group of frightened liberal protesters have decided to back a relatively surprising, if impossible, presidential candidate in 2017, Barack Obama.

And, lest you thing this is a joke, a quick walk around Paris even reveals campaign posters for "Obama17" plastered all around the city.

2017.02.23%20-%20Obama17%202.JPG
 
No tinfoil hat ..... leave that to libtards!
So if you are not an American and in love with the Donald, who could you be but Russian. Tell us the truth. Who are you
How's your hometown? Good community organizers there! Yesterday marked the most violent day of 2017 for folks living in Chicago as the city recorded at least 13 shootings and 7 homicides. According to the Chicago Tribune[4], five of the victims were killed over just a two hour period, including a woman who was eight months pregnant. Meanwhile, the violent Wednesday night brought total shootings for the year to 495 with 99 homicides.
Is that an argument for gun control? Should the Donald send in the military and confiscate all the gang guns? Careful, you'll have the NRA after you.
 
Countless observers have noted the obvious fact that the corporate media’s all-encompassing obsession with anti-Russia hysteria is partly just a shameless campaign to prevent change within the Democratic Party by blaming its loss on an outside enemy as opposed to the oligarch-coddling, corrupt disaster it nominated. While true, the strategy is far bigger than that. So called Western elites have failed miserably across the globe, and the only way to retain their undeserved positions of power (many should be in jail), is to create and promote a mindless, highly emotional, non-domenstic distraction. Enter Russia.
 
good thing urine is renewable
You must be a Christian! Lols

2 Kings 18:27
27 But the commander replied, “Was it only to your master and you that my master sent me to say these things, and not to the people sitting on the wall—who, like you, will have to eat their own excrement and drink their own urine?”
 
Countless observers have noted the obvious fact that the corporate media’s all-encompassing obsession with anti-Russia hysteria is partly just a shameless campaign to prevent change within the Democratic Party by blaming its loss on an outside enemy as opposed to the oligarch-coddling, corrupt disaster it nominated. While true, the strategy is far bigger than that. So called Western elites have failed miserably across the globe, and the only way to retain their undeserved positions of power (many should be in jail), is to create and promote a mindless, highly emotional, non-domenstic distraction. Enter Russia.
So you are Russian. Why are you afraid to admit it? Own it.
 
Come on Dumblin, OWN IT!
What are you afraid of?
You're on to me. I'm a KGB agent sent to infiltrate a ND football fan Internet site to sow pro trump propaganda bc he's in our back pocket. Your sleuthing abilities are just too advanced for me to pull one past you. You've broken the code. Congrats
 
Exactly Dublin,

The Electorial College as well as the Two Senators for each state regardless of size or population
were part of the Compromises that were necessary to pull all the states and people of those states in the
United States.
Next, the Liberals will be crying how unfair it is that the Senate must have more Senators from Large States ?
Wow, now we can have another What if game that can be played in Safe Places !
Wasn't the main point of forming the Electoral College to give the Electors the ability to stop an obviously unfit candidate from becoming President ?
 
I do not care about your views regarding Fox News, but as I have lived through these same events, I can't agree with you. Nothing in the past 3 months matches the violence of Dylan Roofs last summer, much less the violence spewed by the infantile Alt-Right starting with the Oklahoma City bombing by McVeigh and Nichols. I realize this last event mimics the ridiculous groups in the 1960s that were more leftist, but last 3 months have been nothing like these events. I think you are over-stating recent vitriol.

You have to be trolling with you comment about Hannity. Carol Costello at CNN (ow HLN), Rachel Maddow and Great van Sustern at MSNBC, and Hannity are the DUMBEST hosts on cable news. None of these seem to be able to link one fact to another with logic, but Hannity is the worse by far unless he is purposely trying to mis-lead viewers. All four are Intellectually Dishonest, but Hannity is, again, the Worst. I simply can't believe you find him credible.

At the same time, I am neither a registered Democrat or Republican. I have said before that you are yielding some independence of thought to join either party.

My last thoughts, or I will have to consider myself caught by your hook.
Hannity is one of the best news commentators of all time.
 
Wasn't the main point of forming the Electoral College to give the Electors the ability to stop an obviously unfit candidate from becoming President ?

No, unfortunately it was a compromise to the southern colonies (slave owners) who were concerned about population differences between northern and southern colonies; in the slaves did not count fully for population numbers, then the southern colonies wanted to have a different sort of input as well.
 
Wasn't the main point of forming the Electoral College to give the Electors the ability to stop an obviously unfit candidate from becoming President ?
It seemed to work well for well over 200 yrs. That is until Hillary Clinton lost an election.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT