Because they're not better players. Your nostalgia for the 90's & hatred for Lebron cant let you face the facts that he beat tougher teams for his titles than MJ did for his.
OT: Death, Taxes and Lebron James
- Thread starter raulduke_007
- Start date
“Yet none of the players you think are better than Draymond are even sniffing the hall of fame. I guess even the Hall of Fame couldnt upgrade MJ 's shit competition enough to fit your narrative.”
There’s your true colors, Raul. Your biases are showing w/ the “shit competition” comment. We’ll agree to disagree cuz i think your narrative is bullshit just like you think mine is.
There’s your true colors, Raul. Your biases are showing w/ the “shit competition” comment. We’ll agree to disagree cuz i think your narrative is bullshit just like you think mine is.
“Because they're not better players.”
Yes they are. Every one of them. And me thinking that Jordan and a couple others could be better than lebrenda, has nothing to do w/ nostalgia or hating him. I watch the games and then I comment. Just like you, right?
Yes they are. Every one of them. And me thinking that Jordan and a couple others could be better than lebrenda, has nothing to do w/ nostalgia or hating him. I watch the games and then I comment. Just like you, right?
Yeah I disagree 100%.. Draymond is a better player than those 3 you just mentioned
But that's not why I say you don't understand the sport. It was because of your dumb comments about him
Not because you think one player is better than another
“Yeah I disagree 100%.. Draymond is a better player than those 3 you just mentioned
But that's not why I say you don't understand the sport. It was because of your dumb comments about him
Not because you think one player is better than another”
There you go again. Same MO. Disagree w/ Golson and wait for the “you don’t understand the sport” or “you don’t know the game”. Like clockwork. I disagree that he’s better than those I mentioned. I also think your comments about him are dumb. See how that goes?
But that's not why I say you don't understand the sport. It was because of your dumb comments about him
Not because you think one player is better than another”
There you go again. Same MO. Disagree w/ Golson and wait for the “you don’t understand the sport” or “you don’t know the game”. Like clockwork. I disagree that he’s better than those I mentioned. I also think your comments about him are dumb. See how that goes?
I only say if it is true. You're comments were moronic. So yes I don't think you have a clue or watch the sport
Dennis Rodman played a key role in the 1995-96 Chicago Bulls 72-10 season, plus an NBA title, which is the greatest overall season in NBA history.
Far from overrated.
“They were elite in that season” sound familiar? like your Estime back pedaling . So a team can make it to the finals, not great, Audric is not in the Top 3 at his position (not even Top 10 in the draft) but apparently he had an elite season. By your logic, being in the top 2 in a season is elite but now it’s not even great.
Last edited:
“Dennis Rodman played a key role in the 1995-96 Chicago Bulls 72-10 season, plus an NBA title, which is the greatest overall season in NBA history.”
Rodman was a good player but very limited. He also got away w/ murder. The series w/ the jazz were ridiculous w/ what they let him get away w/. A good player but overrated, imo.
Rodman was a good player but very limited. He also got away w/ murder. The series w/ the jazz were ridiculous w/ what they let him get away w/. A good player but overrated, imo.
Fair enough. I observed a stellar defensive player and a prolific rebounder.
Not to be outdone by his enormous contribution to diplomatic relations with North Korea!
Comparing cfb players individual season to a NBA teams ability historically
Talk about a reach with that one 🤣🤣
Nice try
Try again, your definition of elite is in question. You’ve stated clearly that being in the Top 2-3 at your position in any given year is elite. I disagreed, saying you could be the best player at your position but not elite (there’s down years).
Curious why your definition of elite being the best in a given year applies to players but not teams? Seems you may agree with my definition of elite.
Try to think about it a little harder then. I know that is tough for you
I said Estime was elite this year. Not compared to the greats like a Reggie Bush etc.
So that fits exactly what I'm saying. Maybe a Portland was great in 92 but historically comparing teams across eras they are not close to being an elite team. Not even close to some of the teams Lebron played in the finals
Just like I said with Estime, with the position being down, he was great this year. But in context of all time context he's not at that level.
I know that might be hard for you to comprehend
I'm getting sick and tired of your moronic posts. You are annoying. So kick rocks
Tangent - How awful is the product we’re watching on the basketball floor tonight? Good lord it’s unwatchable
You’re either elite or not.. no time frames, back peddling BS. You may be great for a season, quarter half- but to be called elite is different. “That 2 star LB had an elite season” 🤣
The fact 8 guys are standing around on every possession watching as well .
Similar threads
