You are right Chase -- it takes a combination of good recruiting, player development (coaching) and game planning & in-game coaching.And of course, the component that now makes recruiting really less important -- the transfer portal (you should figure that in too) -- 5*s leave, 3*s who play above their rankings transfer in. The old model of recruiting rankings just won't hold up (see Washington.)
But to stick with the old system -- OSU has been in the recruiting top five for the past four years, yet they haven't won a natty since Urban and have appeared in the same amount of final fours as the team you say has woefully lost the recruiting battle (ND.)
Look -- Notre Dame is never going to be able to get the kind of players who want a semi-pro college experience (no real classes, no grades needed to get in, etc.) -- that is just who we are -- no amount of posting is going to change that.
That said, I see a head coach who gets that. A head coach who is bringing in players who you would have passed on -- Estime, Alt, Morrison, Bertrand, Cross, Faison, Watts (Bronco N winner!), -- all three or low four stars (yes, some were Kelly recruits and I believe MF is improving on what Kelly did) who don't fit your metric of top 1-3 recruiting class. Yet, all of them have proved as good (or better) than your five star Bama guys.
We are who we are, Chase. I believe we can do what Michigan and Wash just did.