I’ll be watching ND and bitching as loud as I did with the Weis hire. Another moron that had no HC experience but was going to recruit 5 star talent and win titles. Lol.
I threw an absolute fit when Weis was hired and everyone on this board called me an idiot. Same ole shot around here.
I wouldn’t worry.
First, as with Weis, you may get the last laugh here.
Second, you’re PERFECTLY HEDGED. If Freeman does well, it’s YOUR TEAM doing well. If he doesn’t, you look smarter than 90% of the guys on this board. Either way it’s a 50% satisfaction play.
Whereas the Freeman enthusiasts while looking at a 100% upside if he produces, are also looking at a 100% downside if he washes out:
poor seasons, poor horse-picking.
The smarter play is always that of the HEDGED SKEPTIC. Really, YOU CAN’T LOSE.
As for Freeman's selection itself, it looks to me like ND didn’t think it had a choice but to make the TACTICAL decision to keep all aspects of the program intact – rather than start anew – in the hope that it will lead to the right STRATEGIC result.
Yes, any time you try to solve a strategic problem with a short-term fix you’re opening up the door to a myriad of UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES. But I think Swarbrick was willing to take that risk, knowing that IN TODAY’S MORE FLUID ENVIRONMENT – in which both coaches and players are moving around like chess pieces – Freeman could be axed in two or three years if necessary.
In other words, the cost of axing him later might be lower than not hiring him now. To me, that seems
at least a PLAUSIBLE CALCULUS as per the program’s long-term viability. Besides, what’s to say Freeman himself wouldn’t pull a Kelly at some point? In a couple of years
pulling a Kelly might not even BE A THING. So, who knows how long they even expect him to be around? What if OSU comes calling?
Presumably, Freeman will hold the recruiting class together, and then next September, we’ll see if he can actually run a program as a head coach/CEO.
On average, here’s how experienced head coaches shake out against first-years:
"Hiring coaches with previous NCAA head coaching experience usually pays off: those coaches have improved their teams’ winning percentages by 9.64%, while first-time head coaches have seen their teams regress 0.45%."
So, will Freeman perform according to the average, or will he turn out to be the Second Coming Savior so many are ALREADY banking on?
Like I said, either way, YOU CAN’T LOSE. So, enjoy the ride. This guy will make TONS of mistakes – ALL ROOKIES DO. Which means you’ll get plenty of opportunities to remind people HOW GREEN HE IS. Your downside is NIL.