Two questions:
1. Why was ND in their base defense almost all game? We had guys like Schmidt, Romeo, and Trumbetti dropping into coverage against RBs and WRs all game. I was at the game and it was remarkable seeing how overmatched ND was in coverage in those areas. Is it simply because Farley started at safety and they lacked the nickel they wanted? For the way USC was running their offense, it would have made more sense to me to play Rochell - Day - Tillery - Romeo, Jaylon and Onwalu at LB, and then Kei'vare Luke Farley Shumate and Redfield at the back.
2. I was able to call WAY too many of ND's plays. I'm FAR from an expert, but I found the plays to be easy to predict based on substitution patterns and formations. When you line up Luatua on the left, spread CJ out wide right and start him in motion, it sort of tips the play, no?
1. Why was ND in their base defense almost all game? We had guys like Schmidt, Romeo, and Trumbetti dropping into coverage against RBs and WRs all game. I was at the game and it was remarkable seeing how overmatched ND was in coverage in those areas. Is it simply because Farley started at safety and they lacked the nickel they wanted? For the way USC was running their offense, it would have made more sense to me to play Rochell - Day - Tillery - Romeo, Jaylon and Onwalu at LB, and then Kei'vare Luke Farley Shumate and Redfield at the back.
2. I was able to call WAY too many of ND's plays. I'm FAR from an expert, but I found the plays to be easy to predict based on substitution patterns and formations. When you line up Luatua on the left, spread CJ out wide right and start him in motion, it sort of tips the play, no?