Army and Navy in 95 gave us scares, but AF was the one that Holtz struggled with some (89 and ‘91 was pretty competitive) and lost in 961988 ND 22 Navy 7
That was the only game Lou had against Navy which was anywhere near close.
Army and Navy in 95 gave us scares, but AF was the one that Holtz struggled with some (89 and ‘91 was pretty competitive) and lost in 961988 ND 22 Navy 7
That was the only game Lou had against Navy which was anywhere near close.
Faust struggled against AF also.Army and Navy in 95 gave us scares, but AF was the one that Holtz struggled with some (89 and ‘91 was pretty competitive) and lost in 96
D. All of the aboveThat was a pathetic 2nd half display. I don't know if it was the Navy DC outwitting Rees in their chess match, lackluster effort overall by our offense, poor play by Pyne or some combination of all of those.
Holtz beat Army 28-27 at the old Giants stadium when 165# Ivory Covington stood up 240# Army TE Leshinski on the goal line for what would have been the winning 2pt conversion.1988 ND 22 Navy 7
That was the only game Lou had against Navy which was anywhere near close.
yup. Point of the post was that Lou even had problems with option/boneFaust struggled against AF also.
I was at that game.Holtz beat Army 28-27 at the old Giants stadium when 165# Ivory Covington stood up 240# Army TE Leshinski on the goal line for what would have been the winning 2pt conversion.
You’re totally missing the point.Fire Rees now
5 possessions for 2 yards against $hitass Navy. Factors? My God they should get at least two yards every play. Are you high?It was a bad second half of football for sure im not trying to absolve anybody of their responsibility as it relates to having the team prepared to play better vs a bad Navy team.
I'm just saying that there are factors in play that contributed to making things look worse than they really were.
I see the Clown Show is out in full force. How predictable.Fire Rees now
Thats being kindI thought that the play of the OLine was very substandard !
Yep Rees was what we all thought, agree with youI see the Clown Show is out in full force. How predictable.
We finally agree !Our inability to be prepared focused and play with intensity vs lesser teams is a pattern …. 100% coaching
LIKE WHAT ?It was a bad second half of football for sure im not trying to absolve anybody of their responsibility as it relates to having the team prepared to play better vs a bad Navy team.
I'm just saying that there are factors in play that contributed to making things look worse than they really were.
How much of it was their fault, though? They were outnumbered. Navy was blitzing every play towards the end.I thought that the play of the OLine was very substandard !
Then you run dump offs and screens.How much of it was their fault, though? They were outnumbered. Navy was blitzing every play towards the end.
I Was not able to watch the first half , but I got home at the start of the 3rd Qt. I saw that ND wasA total embarrassment. Was agonizing to sit through.
That's Rees' fault, he's the OC.Then you run dump offs and screens.
I was disappointed that there wasn’t any adjustment made to offset the blitz’s
So explain this … if the play call is a run up the middle, navy stacks the box with 8-9 guys, it’s the players problem it wasn’t successful??You’re totally missing the point.
Yes, you could blame Rees for less than stellar play calls, but once he called each and every play it’s up to the offense to execute those plays, and the offense failed miserably !
?Pyne is the bigger problem than Rees. Freeman isn’t a problem at all
YES, Because the defense doesn’t know the point of attack.So explain this … if the play call is a run up the middle, navy stacks the box with 8-9 guys, it’s the players problem it wasn’t successful??
So explain this … if the play call is a run up the middle, navy stacks the box with 8-9 guys, it’s the players problem it wasn’t successful??
It’s also the HC’s fault, he either approves or disapproves of the callsThat's Rees' fault, he's the OC.
And we did do that in the 1st half. The Estime and Tyree touchdown catches were both on Navy blitzes. But strangely, we never did that in the 2nd half, even though it worked in the 1st half. That's the weird part.Then you run dump offs and screens.
I was disappointed that there wasn’t any adjustment made to offset the blitz’s
Difficult to understandAnd we did do that in the 1st half. The Estime and Tyree touchdown catches were both on Navy blitzes. But strangely, we never did that in the 2nd half, even though it worked in the 1st half. That's the weird part.
Agree the play calls hurt. I can’t blame the OL as much when they are trying to block more guys than you have blocking.YES, Because the defense doesn’t know the point of attack.
If you run the ball between the left tackle and left tight end 6 of the defenders in your theoretical 9 man box are out of the play at the stop. If you run between the center and the guard, with your size advantage, you should be able to get more than a few yards in a half.
The OLine played terrible, 66 yards against Navy and you don’t think that’s a problem
With your theoretical 9 man box, it begs for a short,pass, dump off or screen.
The lack of countermeasures is on the coaches, plural
I agree they should be able to run sweeps…I don’t think Rees called any.Shouldn’t ND still get the push vs a much smaller Navy? And be able to run sweeps being faster?
I still can’t make sense of the 2nd half. Not when ND can play power offense and defense against Clemson all game.
It seems a classic letup happened. Coaches knew this but seemingly couldn’t do much about it.
I’ll take 7-3. Progress. Still observing…as the fact is it will take the rest of the season to fully evaluate. One thing I do feel strongly about: ND has weak QBs.
HC isn't sitting on the phones going "yeah. that's a good call. Go ahead and run that." He might say "run the ball more or let's throw it downfield or work your RPO's. " But he's not giving permission to run a play. That second half was 4 things.It’s also the HC’s fault, he either approves or disapproves of the calls
Most of that was first half. They win in spite of Pyne. Not because of him.?
Pyne went 17 of 21 for 269 yards and 4 TD’s
Nonsense, 17 of 21 should have made running the ball easy, but it didn’t, ND struggled to run the ball and no other QB could have changed thatMost of that was first half. They win in spite of Pyne. Not because of him.
If drake maye or someone of that caliber was the QB of this team they’d be undefeated and would likely make the CFP
1. He did diversify the run game and nothing workedHC isn't sitting on the phones going "yeah. that's a good call. Go ahead and run that." He might say "run the ball more or let's throw it downfield or work your RPO's. " But he's not giving permission to run a play. That second half was 4 things.
1. Rees not diversifying the run game to attack the Navy pressure.
2. Rees not using formations to force Navy out of the 9 man overloads.
3. OL went into a coma and was not intense. Which can happen when you throw the ball a lot and then need to change gears and run it.
4. Pyne being average and not being able to play his way out of the pressure from Navy. He missed some throws that were TD's or BIG plays and he didn't utilize the P in the RPOs.
He did and everyone complained that he should run north-south, not East-westI agree they should be able to run sweeps…I don’t think Rees called any.
Agree, and that’s where I fault Rees for not calling quick outs and/or slants, and screensAgree the play calls hurt. I can’t blame the OL as much when they are trying to block more guys than you have blocking.
I’m not everyone. I don’t recall seeing a single toss.He did and everyone complained that he should run north-south, not East-west
How do you know that he would be better ?Of course we will hopefully get a new OC next year even though I think they will give TR another year due to the circumstances. I’m just hoping MF finally utilizes the transfer portal to bridge the gap until CJ can get here.