You said not one player has entered the portal. Now you're saying it's 2. You just admitted you were wrong, so there is nothing to prove. Stick to your source and the only thing you'll prove is that you're misinformed.
Urlacher to the portal
- Thread starter GDFan
- Start date
By your own admission, your source was wrong and you've been proven otherwise by yourself
College football transfer portal: Ohio State's highest-ranked 2025 departures
Ohio State’s biggest losses to the portal.
247sports.com
here is another source you fool
or is it a tool?
Haha what in the hell does Nebraska have to do with anything? Found a team shittier than the Trojans?
Looks like Ohio state just trimmed the lesser talented guys out to make room for more highly rated recruits.College football transfer portal: Ohio State's highest-ranked 2025 departures
Ohio State’s biggest losses to the portal.
here is another source you fool
or is it a tool?
Urlacher couldn't cover. Everyone knew that with him coming in. I think some thought/wished he would grow more like his dad hoping he became a LB. Doesn't look like it will happen.
He got passed fast on NDs depth chart by players that just walked in the door.
He got passed fast on NDs depth chart by players that just walked in the door.
I wasn’t wrong, I clearly stated that it was a third party source that made the statement, not me.
I never made a declarative statement, I only referenced a third party.
You need to dramatically improve your reading comprehension skills !
You, “Shaking down the thunder” , “echowaker” and “burmafrd!943” are so far beyond incredibly stupid that it’s comical.
You are all so completely lacking in reading comprehension skills that it’s pathetic and indicative that all of you are low IQ morons.
Here’s what I stated:
“The information I received could be incorrect, but I’m told that not one player from Ohio State entered the transfer portal.”
Did any of you low IQ morons not read the first part of my sentence ?
The part where II said: “The information I received could be incorrect” ?
You should be embarrassed by your stupidity, but I guess you’ve gotten used to it since it’s become your usual standard !
Yeah your source was wrong. It's okay to admit what you stated wasnt correct. It's okay
Then you said you would stick with your source until proven otherwise all while knowing he was already proven otherwise
You have always been a riot
S
"I believe that only two (2) players left in the spring portal, a punter and a WR.
I’ll stick with my source until proven otherwise !"
You're stating what you believe and you're stating you'll stick with your source after it was already proven your source was wrong by multiple posters.
Did you not read your own post:
"I believe that only two (2) players left in the spring portal, a punter and a WR.
I’ll stick with my source until proven otherwise !"
You're stating what you believe and you're stating you'll stick with your source after it was already proven your source was wrong by multiple posters.
If you could read with an iota of reading comprehension skills you might be able to make semi-intelligent posts, but that’s too much to ask
The article was referencing the spring portal and multiple posters did not prove it wrong
You’re too stupid to understand that that statement was included in my original post
Article or not, what you posted is inaccurate. A quick Google search would've cleared that up. If your intention is to provoke reactions, get called out for spreading misinformation, and then insult others, you're on the right track. Just don't expect to be taken seriously or for your posts to hold any credibility.
....You're arguing with a senile 80+ year old who has an imaginary NFL cheerleader girlfriend.....
None of the above apply.
I read the article and was struck by its content and decided to cite its content.
I can’t help it if you’re incapable of reading without the ability to comprehend what you’re reading
Citing an article doesn’t excuse spreading misinformation, especially when the claims are easily disproven with a simple google search. If your takeaway from the article led to confusion, that’s on you. Not on others for pointing it out. Resorting to insults doesn’t strengthen your point. It just proves there is no reason to take you seriously.
80+ is correct, as to being senile, I’m a lot sharper than you, as to the girlfriend, she’s now an ex, but we remain friendly. And I showed photos of us together to another poster.
but my most recent was even better looking with a better figure.
So, if you were jealous before, you’d be more so today and I hope that that really, really aggravates you !
Unlike you, I’ve always had great taste.
I didn’t spread misinformation and I clearly stated that the article could be incorrect, you’re just too stupid to understand that
Oh I stand corrected. You didn't spread misinformation. You just demonstrated that you're misinformed. Thank you for clarifying.
I’m glad that you see the error of your ways.
I wasn’t misinformed at all, I stated that the author might be incorrect from the very beginning
And as multiple posters have pointed out, you often make statements that end up contradicting what you stated from the very beginning.
You already mentioned us:
You, “Shaking down the thunder” , “echowaker” and “burmafrd!943” are so far beyond incredibly stupid that it’s comical.
Go back to any of our posts and your misinformation is pointed out.
Here’s another article I just read.
THE UNEXPECTED ANNOUNCEMENT: Notre Dame, IN – In a stunning turn of events that has sent shockwaves through the college football world, former Notre Dame quarterback and current Kansas City Chiefs star Ian Book has announced his decision to return to South Bend and finish his football career with…..
No need to cite. You already listed the posters who called you out in this thread. Ignore it or go back and read. I don't care. Doesn't change anything. We all know you're misinformed.
That’s putting it mildly!
Once again you failed to cite where I contradicted myself, which is what you stated.
So cite where I contradicted myself.
Failing to do so, just admit that you were wrong ………… if you have the character to do so !
You keep demanding citations, yet you’ve already been shown multiple examples by others in the thread. If you genuinely cared about clarity, you'd reread instead of deflecting. You made a statement, people responded, and now you're trying to reframe it to save face. That's on you.
You made the statement that I contradict myself, so I asked you to prove it by providing citations where I contradicted myself.
You have failed to do so.
Instead you stated that “I made a statement and others responded”
That has nothing to do with me contradicting myself.
So I’ll ask you again ……… cite where I contradicted myself
Failing to provide the citation where I contradicted myself, just admit that you were wrong
Or do you lack the character and integrity to admit that you were wrong and misspoke
You're fixated on a citation to deflect from the broader point. Your statements were inconsistent, and multiple people pointed that out. If you can’t see that, then that's on you.
