So....5 though 7 ?

[Patrish]

And w/ just a little online search I found out that about 30% of the time, the lower seed beats the higher seeded team in March Madness. I don't think that is the definition of VERY RARELY.

Cite your source

 

[NotreDomer1]

I post a lot, so I can't recall. Apparently it's important to you that I know what I said. So go ahead and tell me.

Not interested in reciting your own words to you. It’s your thoughts after all

 

[Patrish]

Cite your source. In addition, you have to take a deeper dive as your stat probably includes the 16th seeded team beating the !5th seeded team, the 8th seeded team beating the 7th seeded team. Get the first round of 64 stat, I’ll bet it’s 10 % or less

 

[Shakin' Down the Thunder]

Not interested in reciting your own words to you. It’s your thoughts after all

Then why bother challenging my thoughts if you're not gonna clarify which part you disagree with? Lol.

 

[Shakin' Down the Thunder]

Cite your source

Are you serious? You can't do a simple Google or chatgpt search for ncaa basketball results of Lower seeds v. Higher seeds? And who do you think you are telling me what I have to do? You make the rules of this board? Get over yourself man.

 

[Golson5]

I'm just curious how often do you feel insulted on this board? My guess is a lot, as you can't resist ending the conversation even after you say you're done. Doesn't that tell you that you might be the problem? Maybe you just don't know how to talk to people.

As stated earlier, regular season is a different animal than the playoffs. I never said anything about regular season scheduling and who you play in the regular season. No one has any idea who will be a tough opponent on their schedule 5 years from now, as schedules made far in advance. Yes, schools do schedule FCS teams and I think that's cowardly. I'm including ND in that category for doing that w/ Tennessee state. You play who's on your schedule and fight to get in and focus on whomever is next in the playoffs. You can't compare the 2.

I find it incredibly arrogant of you, that you can absolutely know that someone is lying without any proof. But hey good for you man.

You're so full of shit you don't even know which way to spin control.

Your argument sucked and you tried to insult me but you looked like a fool with your ridiculous comment

You had a bad point and what it got pointed out how stupid it was you had to start with the insults because you were had

 

[sjb75]

Can’t we all just get along??

 

[Shakin' Down the Thunder]

You're so full of shit you don't even know which way to spin control.

Your argument sucked and you tried to insult me but you looked like a fool with your ridiculous comment

You had a bad point and what it got pointed out how stupid it was you had to start with the insults because you were had

Okay, you think I'm full of shit? Not very specific though. So what part?

I didn't try to insult you and that just proves my point about you. I think you're so used to people picking on you that you're hypersensitive to any sort of disagreement and feel like you have act all tough using curse words. Do you honestly expect to say these things and expect people to like you? To respect your opinion?

 

[NotreDomer1]

Then why bother challenging my thoughts if you're not gonna clarify which part you disagree with? Lol.

I think I was clear what I was challenging. You’re just diverting now.

 

[Patrish]

Are you serious? You can't do a simple Google or chatgpt search for ncaa basketball results of Lower seeds v. Higher seeds? And who do you think you are telling me what I have to do? You make the rules of this board? Get over yourself man.

I’ll repeat, you have to do a much deeper dive into the statistics

A 16th seed beating a 15th seed is an irrelevant stat, ditto an eighth seed beating seven seed

Try googling how many times a 16 seed beats a 1 seed, or a 15 seed beats a 2 seed.

It’s rare

 

[Shakin' Down the Thunder]

I’ll repeat, you have to do a much deeper dive into the statistics

A 16th seed beating a 15th seed is an irrelevant stat, ditto an eighth seed beating seven seed

Try googling how many times a 16 seed beats a 1 seed, or a 15 seed beats a 2 seed.

It’s rare

Repeat as much as you want. You're not gonna tell people what to do. You want data to support your argument? You look it up.

And here's what funny about your 16th v. 15th seed comment. How many games of the 16th v. 15th seeded teams taken place in march madness? Nice job making your point irrelevant.