So when Trump mentions that coal plants are opening, which coal plants is he referring to that have opened since he started?
OT: Trump Truth
- Thread starter SeanPol355
- Start date
So when Trump mentions that coal plants are opening, which coal plants is he referring to that have opened since he started?
I have no problem with pointing out President Trump short comings which seem to grow monthly, but their short sidedness of the truly criminal acts that happened during president Obama tenure is stunning.
Could you imagine the Press allowing president Trump to use the IRS as a weapon against progressives?
Could you imagine a fast and furious scandal going unnoticed and then President Trump's Attorney General being in contempt of Congress without a special prosecutor being appointed? How about President Trump getting away with spying on the press as President Obama did without any consequences??
Could you imagine president Trump getting away with his NSA spying on tens of Millions of American citizens violating their constitutional rights going unnoticed... Could you imagine president Trump getting away with relaxing who sees classified documents and no one Batten an eye over it.
These are just a few examples.
My understanding, as per the article I posted, is that the development of that mine was in process prior to the election.
So you expect President Trump to have new applications put in/approved/plant built and running in less than 6 months ????????????
I expect that if he's going to tout new coal plants or mines that are opening as a result of what he's doing, he should actually have evidence to back that up.
To answer your question, no, I don't expect that to happen. But I also don't expect him to make things up..
Just curious did you hold President Obama to the same standards, and were you just as outraged then as you seem to be now about thing that have not come to pass?
Their outrage is very selective. We've been lectured on the pitfalls of living in the past when mentioning Barry O. Even their reason for living in the past is incredibly selective. I've given the left multiple opportunities to clear their conscience by expressing outrage for the past eight years which would give them at least some credibility for the outrage they are putting on display now. Predictably, lots of silence, some excuses, a little put out that they are actually being challenged, but no takers.
(1) I don't like anyone who isn't straightforward (which may mean I don't like anyone holding office or running for office).
(2) I could throw the same question back at you. Candidly, no one with an ideological bent holds people with similar views to the same standard as people with other views.
The woman finally figured it out! It's in her new book.
(1) I must of missed your criticisms of the previous President
(2) Please do!
I have been critical of President Trump.
Here's an awesome article about Trump. A lot of people on both sides of the aisle are concerned about his treatment of Sessions. Other concerns include his constant need for attention through tweets, his ongoing campaign rallies, and instability.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/07/donald-trump-eats-first/534927/
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/07/donald-trump-eats-first/534927/
If President Trump fires the AG he will lose me, and the tweets are my main criticism.
You gotta get with the present. Why do you feel the need to somehow receive some sort of satisfaction from others about the mistakes of the past ? That was then this is now. Still waiting for someone's outrage over the Joe kuharich hiring ?
So let's just forget about all the injustice committed by the previous administration (that the left let pass) which got Donald Trump elected and just move on correct?
Well-written, interesting piece that gathers perspectives from both sides of the aisle.
This new Communications Director, Anthony Scaramucci, is a mess. First he accuses the Chief of Staff (Priebus) of being a "leaker" and says he's going to contact the FBI over a "felony leak" of a publicly available document.
Then, he calls in to CNN and says he and Priebus are brothers like "Cain and Abel." Then, he explains the need for professionalism by quoting Joe Paterno:
"Do you remember Joe Paterno? What would he say? Act like you've been there before. Act with honor, dignity, and respect."
Yeah, if you are looking for the best example of "honor," I'm not sure Joe Paterno is the best guy to quote in 2017.
#hotmess
Then, he calls in to CNN and says he and Priebus are brothers like "Cain and Abel." Then, he explains the need for professionalism by quoting Joe Paterno:
"Do you remember Joe Paterno? What would he say? Act like you've been there before. Act with honor, dignity, and respect."
Yeah, if you are looking for the best example of "honor," I'm not sure Joe Paterno is the best guy to quote in 2017.
#hotmess
All I heard during the Iraq invasion was another Vietnam. We are reminded about slavery daily. Watergate is a story the left won't let go. Southern landmarks are being taken out of site, out of mind, because of the past. The media has brought up Watergate constantly when referencing the Russia investigation. The past is studied and dissected all over the world in think tanks and schools everywhere. You just don't want to talk about the PAST eight years. Those who don't remember the past are bound to repeat it. Sound familiar? I can't believe this has to be explained to you.
Scaramucci is going to help move his agenda forward. Great hire by Trump.
Sounds good. We have a guy on our local soccer forum who posts "awesome" and "great" articles about Trump, and every one of the articles is by a lefty wing columnist and rips Trump to shreds. To that poster, those are "great" and "awesome".
No one said forget anything. But constantly pointing to the past as some sort of defense of current events is crazy to me.toby acts like some here OWE him something.
No. I get it perfectly. My problem is YOU practically demanding that we owe you some sort of diatribe about past events. Why the incessant need to reference the past to avoid discussing the present ?
Sounds like Mooch fits right in with fake president Trumpsky's merry band of idiots and traitors.
I don t care one way or another.it just seems that the current administration has had numerous personnel changes in a short period of time.
There are more coming. He never read "How to win friends and influence people."
I remember the Clinton administration had a lot of changes his first year.
BTW I voted for him also
For what it's worth, I've read a decent amount of Friedersdorf. He's not a "lefty wing columnist".
Not at all. And in the article I linked, he quotes almost every conservative in the book, from National Review to Rush Limbaugh to Breitbart.
Holy shit! This Scaramucci is absolutely insane. In an interview today, he called the chief of staff a "f*cking paranoid schizophrenic." He also called Steve Bannon someone who was "Trying to suck his own dick."
In the interview earlier in the day, he demanded to know a reporters source on a quote, and when the reporter wouldn't give it up, he threatened to fire everyone.
Good to know the White House is hiring the best and the brightest.
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/07/27/us/politics/scaramucci-priebus-leaks.html?#_=_
In the interview earlier in the day, he demanded to know a reporters source on a quote, and when the reporter wouldn't give it up, he threatened to fire everyone.
Good to know the White House is hiring the best and the brightest.
https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/07/27/us/politics/scaramucci-priebus-leaks.html?#_=_
Last edited:
Bodizephax
I've posted how many times?
Economy is doing great under Donald J Trump. Jobs reports have been great. Stock market doing great. Isis on the run. MS 13 being dealt with finally. Illegal immigration down. Liberals crying like little babies. The present is great !
What's the present? Collusion? Russia? Cheating? Lying? Emails? Boy Scouts? Ivanka? Barron? Incessant twitter which is even driving me nuts? Transgender? North Korea? What present thing you want to talk about to avoid discussing the scandals that killed people in the past? I do want your take on the Four Star QB who verbaled to Princeton. I find it fascinating but not a trend.
