Apparently Mogadishu.What neighborhood do you live in that you need any of the guns you mentioned?
Apparently Mogadishu.What neighborhood do you live in that you need any of the guns you mentioned?
All these tough talking SOB's in here would be singing a different tune if their daughters were slaughtered last night. #Fact
God bless Donald Trump and the populist agenda. Hardcore right-wing nut jobs are just as bad as the lying liberals.
Not in America at least. Somalia, Afghanistan, Iraq and other war zones I would disagree.Absolutely no one NEEDS an ak 47
What a country huh!BS. You can't possible know that since pretty much no research has been done about gun violence since 1996. The government can't and doesn't spend money on gun violence research in large part because of the Dickey Amendment. You have NO idea what the actual percentage of gun owning Americans are responsible. If you are going to make a bold claim like that at least try to back it up with facts. That is the whole problem with this debate. It is devoid of facts, reason, and logic.
I own a handgun(1911) so I am not against gun ownership. I just happen to be for reasonable gun control. My best friend is a SF operator and even he does not own that kind of arsenal. He has his service 9mm and his wife has a 9mm. Nothing crazy. Civilians should not own combat rifles. ARs, AK's(congrats on owning a russian made weapon) , Barrett m107A1 .50 cal semi-automatic 10 round rifle(.50 cal sniper rifle basically), and others are meant as instruments of war. Why own those guns for protection. Slow draw and not easy to navigate close quarters like a handgun is anyway.
Things you can do to keep your family safe:
Don't live in a bad neighborhood if you can help it
Upgrade or install a state of the art security system like I just recently did. 360 degrees of camera coverage.
Buy a dog . I have a Perro de Presa Canario. Highly recommend.
Very well trained, great with my kids, and also suspicious by nature. Exactly what I wanted. Will protect me and my family to the death.
AgreeSo not surprised you all are politicking this. You who are doing it.....man.....have you no soul? God have mercy on you. Maybe we should just pray here.
Every state does a background check first. It's mandatory. Then you fill out registration paperwork. Then the serial number is matched with a ballistics test certificate that matches the firearm to your purchase. If your gun was purchased legally it is traceable.If you are a felon you will be denied. End of story. And that's a fact jack look it up !How about a background check on everyone that buys a gun? Yes, I know his mother bought the gun.
How about limiting clips to 10? Why does anyone need 30 round clips?
I'm sure @deadirishpoet has those for his neighborhood watch.
So not surprised you all are politicking this. You who are doing it.....man.....have you no soul? God have mercy on you. Maybe we should just pray here.
Every state does a background check first. It's mandatory. Then you fill out registration paperwork. Then the serial number is matched with a ballistics test certificate that matches the firearm to your purchase. If your gun was purchased legally it is traceable.If you are a felon you will be denied. End of story. And that's a fact jack look it up !
Trust me dude. Chicago has some of the strictest if not the strictest gun laws in America. I have a lot of relatives living there. On top of it the liberal mayor won't do a damn thing to stop the non-stop senseless black-on-black murders.
40% of guns are sold by unlicensed dealers. This includes at gun shows. There's no background check required in these instances. I'm sure you knew that though.
Some states only require background checks at licensed dealers for handguns.
"Lets work together and gets these kinds of guns out of the hands of the people who shouldn't have them."
And here lies the problem of legislating this
Stu, no way in hell your friends in the NRA agree with you that guns should be taken away from everyone except law enforcement and the military. A scenario that our founding fathers were expressly against. Trump has suggested before that he is interested in some form of strengthening control over firearms, and he may in fact be the populist maverick that can bring something positive about.Guys... It is time to get these guns (and the 'upgrades' that allowed him to fire multiple shots per second) out of the hands of anyone but Law Enforcement and the Military.
Keep them locked at gun clubs if people need to shoot them.
I have to say after Sandy Hook I lost faith in our country. I lost faith that we can ever really do something to stop this kind of gun violence. 20 5-6 year olds were murdered that day. I remember I pulled over to the side of the street and cried. Today is just as bad.
We need to do something to shut this down.
Maybe D.T. as the guy who can make a deal can help us make some changes? Even my friends in the NRA agree this has to stop.
Lets work together and gets these kinds of guns out of the hands of the people who shouldn't have them.
Stu, no way in hell your friends in the NRA agree with you that guns should be taken away from everyone except law enforcement and the military. A scenario that our founding fathers were expressly against. Trump has suggested before that he is interested in some form of strengthening control over firearms, and he may in fact be the populist maverick that can bring something positive about.
Why?
Any weapon is a military weapon silly that would include my wife's snub nose 22.Because it's a military weapon. Are you fighting a war in your neighborhood?
More BIG government......shocker
Do you really feel the act of this madman was your fault?I really wonder about some people today, great our fore fathers believed we should arm ourselves against the "enemy" depending on which side you were on. An here we sit squabbling over an amendment ratified in 1791, in a society that doesn't exist today. Society should understand with time these rights/laws should change especially if our technology has gotten to that point. Something is seriously wrong with people who believe you need tactical weapons that can gun down 500+ people in your household in a matter of minutes.
They think it's about them, the arguement is always about me, the second amendment protects me blah, blah,blah blah. This is why there is such division in society today, if people stop thinking about me, and think about us, this would be an easy decision. The problem is and will always be we are a selfish society with selfish people and that is unfortunate bc we can't comprehend situtions like mass shootings and mass murder is our fault bc we do nothing but hide behind a selfish amendment, instead of thinking about everyone else. Sad just sad.
Because the Constitution specifically States federal government is responsible for protecting our nation.It is a big, complicated country. And you certainly support our big government ($700 billion, dwarfing all others) military.
Do you really feel the act of this madman was your fault?
I don't
Do you feel responsible?
Because the Constitution specifically States federal government is responsible for protecting our nation.
Not education not Healthcare those are state issues
I see. Take careDip no disrespect to you, but we are on totally different ends of the spectrum on this topic. I've already said my part. Have a good day.
please try to justify why any citizen needs a weapon of war in their day to day life ? because you can is a weak reason in my opinion.Says ................you?
oh please . apples and oranges. you're better than that.Any weapon is a military weapon silly that would include my wife's snub nose 22.
So you are going to be the arbiter of what Americans need and don't need?
Thank goodness the Supreme Court agrees with me and not you
please try to justify why any citizen needs a weapon of war in their day to day life ? because you can is a weak reason in my opinion.