why would anyone give a rat's patoot about what rivals thinks ?5* by rivals? It seems if he is in top5 that he would be rated at top. I just don't get rivals calculations and ratings.
but why ? it doesn't mean a damn thing. the ONLY ratings that truly matter are the ones done by collegiate coaching staffs.I give a rat's a#$ because Kraemer is deserving of it. Kid has earned it. Like SA said maybe after season he'll get it. just see rivals as biased toward south & west coast kids.
Different scales so no relationship between the two ratings.5* by rivals? It seems if he is in top5 that he would be rated at top. I just don't get rivals calculations and ratings.