ADVERTISEMENT

Echowaker, Thoughts On 2017 OL Recruits?

Artemis,

Why would the smartest people in America want to major in education when there is so little financial reward or benefit incentive to get involved in education at the high school or elementary level? Coupled with the price of your education, I wouldn't want to be an American teacher either. Get paid like crap and have student debts for years and years? No thanks.

Secondly, I think you guys make it WAAAAAYYYY too easy for just anybody to become a teacher. Up here to become a high school teacher you must complete a 4 year undergraduate degree in which you obtain a major and two minors (your two teachables on top of your major) to even apply to teacher's college. At that point, you have to get accepted to one of few EXTREMELY competitive teachers colleges throughout the country and complete a 2 year Masters in Education program, at which time, you become a certified teacher up graduation... So it takes you 6 years to become a teacher in Canada. Fortunately, because the cost of our education is lunacy like yours, the total cost of that 6 year degree Is between $45,000-$50,000... Or the equivalent about ONE year at Notre Dame. With that degree you can get the job that I outlined in my post above.

My area of advanced study was in comparative politics between the United States and Canada. The two specific things that my research and study focused on the most were education and health care system differences between Canada and the United States. This is just one opinion, but I feel that there is no clear cut better medical system. Both of our systems (yours has obviously changed a lot) have strengths and weaknesses... But with all due respect, I'd be more than happy to have a great conversation with you regarding how broken your education system is. It's actually one of my favourite topics of interest.

You're so right that the American education system was once the class of the world, but that drop off has been immense and that it's getting worse, not better...

5 key points from my thesis that I think are real problems...

1. Inferior federal mandated support for schools and education in America. I know the separation between State and Federal money is a hot topic in the U.S. and I know that the last thing many Americans want are Feds telling their state how to use their tax payers money for education... But look around the work. The countries that have strongest Federal ties to education, also have the best educated kids. Although Canadians kids are still among the 10 most educated in the world, we actually have a quasi U.S. / socialist system. Education falls under provincial control, much like in the States, but there are much tighter controls by the Federal government to ensure that the provinces' education money is being used properly and making it's way to the kids.

2. Inferior education for teachers, compared to other G7/8 countries. The rest of the world has realized that if you want bright, talented, motivated people teaching your kids, you must make their education a rigorous process, weeding out those who simply want to collect a paycheck or obtain a job easily. However if you're going to make the education plan for teachers long and rigorous, it also has to be affordable. Again, 6 years of tuition up here will cost you around $50,000. That's at universities that rank between top 20-100 in the world. Not second and third tier institutions, but nationally and internationally recognized institutions. Why would I want to spend 6 years becoming a teacher if it's going to cost me $300,000 to do so? That's more than 3 years wage for a Canadian high school teacher.

3. Speaking of compensation, if you don't compensate teachers like business men, engineers, those involved in sciences, etc, etc, why would bright capitalists want to become involved in the profession? Your teachers are woefully underpaid compared to the other G7/8 countries. The "American Dream" is about working your ass off towards something in order to obtain fair compensation and reward for said work, is it not? Teachers don't seem to fit into that equation do they? It seems more like a life of debt and hovering just above the poverty line, while your friends from school go to work at big corporations, on Wall Street, in Silicon Valley, etc, etc for six-figure salaries... Hell, I would do that, wouldn't you?

4. Complete inequality from one school to the next, one city to the next and one state to the next. I don't think I need to dive deep into this socio-economic, race related, and geographic cans of worms. It doesn't end well. I'll simply say this. Anywhere you go in Canada, every student gets the same quality of education and basically the same resources to obtain that education. We don't have private universities that tend to accept more kids from the wealthier schools vs the inner city schools, etc, etc. It doesn't matter if you are from the middle of nowhere Northern Ontario (like I was) or from the wealthiest private school in Montreal or Toronto. You have the same admissions standards and the better candidate gets in. Period. Sorority's and fraternity's are basically just social clubs here and being a "legacy" means virtually nothing when applying to a school... Oh and every student applying to University or College in Canada is approved for a student loan from the federal / provincials government (they split the cost). It's very simple. They look at your financial needs and approve you for a yearly loan based on that need. If you graduate on time and in good academic standing they grant you a certain percentage of that loan (it varies from province-to-province). In my case I borrowed $31,000 over my University career and was forced to pay back 60% of the loan, with a 40% grant based on my graduating on time and my academic achievement while in school. It's a great motivator and incentive program. You begin paying your loan back 8 months after graduation and you can apply for 2, 8 month extensions if you have not found work in your chosen field of work within your first 8 months out of school.

5. Lastly, it's on the parents too. Studies have shown that modern American parents spend less time with their children, less time promoting school, homework and promoting the idea of education, than ever before. There are lot of theories behind this, but technology seems to be one of the biggest culprits. Parents are obsessed with social media every bit as much as their children are these days and in a lot of cases, parents are drones to their television, Netflicks, cell phones, laptops, tablets, twitter, Facebook, Insagram, etc, etc every bit as much as their children are... That's without even talking about video games and that industry has sapped the souls of children and parents alike. Many modern parents are sending their children to school each day and simply saying "here you go, you educate them" but there is no more team effort between the teacher and parent to coordinate learning, or to promote responsibility.
 
Irish, 2 questions

Are Canadian teachers unionized?

Do students have access to private schools, subsidized by the government?
 
Tomb,

1. Canadian teachers are definitely unionized. The Ontario Teachers Union is extremely powerful. They owned the friggen Toronto Maple Leafs for quite some time.

2. To my knowledge, private education is never paid for b y the government here. Anybody who wants to send their kid to a private or prep school must pay for it on their own accord. The great thing is that if you can't afford to do so, it doesn't matter. I've taught and coached dozens of kids that have went from our average run-of-the-mill Canadian Catholic School in a city above about 60,000 people, that have gone on to school at places like McGill and the University of Toronto (top 25 universities in the world) at the cost of about $6500-$7000 per year. We've also produced a lot of students athletes (mostly male hockey players and female track-and-field and cross country athletes) that have went to American schools like Harvard, Yale, Northwestern, Duke, Notre Dame, etc, etc on full rides... It's usually no problem for our kids to get in (I'm talking public school kids). It's very common for our kids to have marks in upper 80's and lower 90's and to destroy the SAT's they take to go South. The education they get at the high school level is much tougher than a lot of their American counterparts (I mean that in all sincerity).

For example, I did a semester exchange at Notre Dame, from my average Canadian university, ranked somewhere between #80-#95 worldwide. I'm talking a good, not great school. I can tell you this. My course were much more demanding at my school. I was actually shocked because I expected Notre Dame to be very difficult because of it's prestige. I was young though and I didn't yet fully understand that it's name on the degree and the alumni connections associated with the degree that provide the real advantages in the United States, not always the actual quality of education you're getting... Again Notre Dame is awesome. Loved my experience, the people and learning from your country's perspective rather than mine (for a change). I'll be a fan of Notre Dame and the way it does things, until I die. Much prettier than our campus as well. Canadian schools tend to focus on the quality within the classroom rather than the esthetics outside of them. I can tell you that I enjoyed that at Notre Dame they focused on both! Would have loved to stay for a full year... No way in hell that education is worth upwards of $70,000 per year though after you pay residence costs, pay to eat, have a social life, etc, etc.... Maybe it is for some, but not for me. I always wanted to teach (at the time). I'd rather pay $50,000 for 6 years of education and get $100,000 job out of the deal with great pension and benefits, than get the same type of job (paywise) for 6-8 times the price (over 6 years).
 
And yet for all that education and knowledge and the advantages you enjoy politically and demographically, here you sit in the middle of the night typing away ,with the rest of us. Interesting.[smile]
 
Why would a ND alum, as Echo claims to be, become a Gym teacher? Got to question whether he was an alum or not. Who goes to ND to make $30k a year?
let's deal in facts, something foreign to you. i have NEVER claimed to be a graduate of notre dame. i am a graduate of michigan state university where i was a member of the football team. i started 28 games in my five years there. i am a high school social studies teacher and long time o-line coach and offensive coordinator at a Division 1 high school in ohio. i am currently not teaching as i am filling in for our AD who is going through some health issues. it's easily a full time position given the size of the school and the number of sports we participate in. anything else ?
 
Try to keep up Perse... Both Decker and I are talking about last year, as in 2015, which we've stated numerous times... 2015 was undeniably a run based offense and 2016 will be no different. A combination of personnel and the addition of Mike Sanford is the obvious reason for the offense to head further into that direction.

When have I seen ND run schemes that allow their OL to tee off and dominate for more than a series? Should I link you to game replays of the Stanford game last year when ND pulled guards and tackles all game and ran it down the Cardinal's throat, or should I link you to a replay of the LSU bowl game in 2014 when ND spent the entire game in multiple TE looks and Folston and Zaire smashed LSU for 4 quarters behind ND's offensive line and multiple TE looks?

Against Stanford last year...

Notre Dame rushed 35 times (10 more than they passed) for 300 yards and 2 TDs. They ran the ball predominantly for large stretches of the game, they produced a 128 yard rusher in that game and a 168 yard rusher in that game. They averaged 8.5 yards per carry and Josh Adams averaged 9.3 yards per carry... Is that teeing off enough for you?

Against Navy last year...

Notre Dame rushed 40 times (10 more than they passed) for 178 yards and 4 TDs. CJ Procise alone had 129 yards, averaged 6.1 yards per carry and scored 3 rushing TD's... is that teeing off enough for you?

Against Texas last year...

Notre Dame rushed 50 times (27 more than they passed) for 218 yards and 2 TD's. Procise and Adams combined for about 7 yards per carry and 2 rushing TD's... is 50 carries not teeing off enough for you?

Against LSU in the 2014 bowl game (Zaire's first start)...

Notre Dame rushed 51 times (25 more than they passed) for 263 yards and 3 TD's against a tough SEC defense. Procise, Folston and Zaire combined to average over 5 yards per carry... Is 51 carries not teeing off enough for you?

You asked me when the last time I saw Notre Dame run like this for more than a series... There are just 4 examples from this past season, plus the last game of the season before it, when ND's identity began to shift with the insertion of Zaire at QB.
kelly has always seeked balance in his offenses. perse sees a qb in the shotgun and thinks it always means pass. he doesn't understand the game period. don't lower yourself.
 
let's deal in facts, something foreign to you. i have NEVER claimed to be a graduate of notre dame. i am a graduate of michigan state university where i was a member of the football team. i started 28 games in my five years there. i am a high school social studies teacher and long time o-line coach and offensive coordinator at a Division 1 high school in ohio. i am currently not teaching as i am filling in for our AD who is going through some health issues. it's easily a full time position given the size of the school and the number of sports we participate in. anything else ?
Echo to whom is this directed, please?
 
my stalker . he used to be turnover machine until he got banned. mcilhenny irish ?
I thought for a moment that I had offended you my remarks were a tweak to IIO [we hold degrees from the same University] I have some folks on ignore which makes it difficult to follow the game sometimes. McIlhenny made the list pretty quickly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: echowaker
Gael,

"Advantageous" or not not, I'm a night a night owl like everyone else :)

By the way, you had asked about the Special Teams Coordinator job at Ottawa sometime last week. I had meant to respond and it slipped my mind. I actually know Steve Watts (the former coordinator) quite well. Really good guy. Played at Ottawa, was an Academic All Canadian and went on to coach some really good defenses at St. Mary's while doing his Masters before coming back home.

Steve decided to step down to pursue a lucrative family business, but it was tough for him to make that decision. He's a staunch Christian guy, a solid recruiter and his players loved him. He also had one of the finest special teams units in the country. In four years (?) they never gave up a return TD of any kind and I believe they led the nation in return TD's under his watch. He has developed among the nation's best kicker and Lou (recruited out of Kingston) will likely kick in the CFL when he graduates next year. Two of his DB's will be turning prop as well in the near future, Jackson Bennett (who he converted from RB to FS) an Ottawa native, and a young DB he recruited from Texas who had some problems at Missouri Southern before coming up to Canada to finish his degree (name slips my mind right now).

Anyways, thought you might be interested. Losing Steve was. It for the program overall. The defense hadn't been good the past couple years, but it wasn't on him!
 
Gael,

"Advantageous" or not not, I'm a night a night owl like everyone else :)

By the way, you had asked about the Special Teams Coordinator job at Ottawa sometime last week. I had meant to respond and it slipped my mind. I actually know Steve Watts (the former coordinator) quite well. Really good guy. Played at Ottawa, was an Academic All Canadian and went on to coach some really good defenses at St. Mary's while doing his Masters before coming back home.

Steve decided to step down to pursue a lucrative family business, but it was tough for him to make that decision. He's a staunch Christian guy, a solid recruiter and his players loved him. He also had one of the finest special teams units in the country. In four years (?) they never gave up a return TD of any kind and I believe they led the nation in return TD's under his watch. He has developed among the nation's best kicker and Lou (recruited out of Kingston) will likely kick in the CFL when he graduates next year. Two of his DB's will be turning prop as well in the near future, Jackson Bennett (who he converted from RB to FS) an Ottawa native, and a young DB he recruited from Texas who had some problems at Missouri Southern before coming up to Canada to finish his degree (name slips my mind right now).

Anyways, thought you might be interested. Losing Steve was. It for the program overall. The defense hadn't been good the past couple years, but it wasn't on him!
Thanks for this, where besides recruiting did you see the defense lacking? I've seen a couple of games and been to some practices but didn't think anyone played D in the CIS anymore.
 
Tomb,

1. Canadian teachers are definitely unionized. The Ontario Teachers Union is extremely powerful. They owned the friggen Toronto Maple Leafs for quite some time.

2. To my knowledge, private education is never paid for b y the government here. Anybody who wants to send their kid to a private or prep school must pay for it on their own accord. The great thing is that if you can't afford to do so, it doesn't matter. I've taught and coached dozens of kids that have went from our average run-of-the-mill Canadian Catholic School in a city above about 60,000 people, that have gone on to school at places like McGill and the University of Toronto (top 25 universities in the world) at the cost of about $6500-$7000 per year. We've also produced a lot of students athletes (mostly male hockey players and female track-and-field and cross country athletes) that have went to American schools like Harvard, Yale, Northwestern, Duke, Notre Dame, etc, etc on full rides... It's usually no problem for our kids to get in (I'm talking public school kids). It's very common for our kids to have marks in upper 80's and lower 90's and to destroy the SAT's they take to go South. The education they get at the high school level is much tougher than a lot of their American counterparts (I mean that in all sincerity).

For example, I did a semester exchange at Notre Dame, from my average Canadian university, ranked somewhere between #80-#95 worldwide. I'm talking a good, not great school. I can tell you this. My course were much more demanding at my school. I was actually shocked because I expected Notre Dame to be very difficult because of it's prestige. I was young though and I didn't yet fully understand that it's name on the degree and the alumni connections associated with the degree that provide the real advantages in the United States, not always the actual quality of education you're getting... Again Notre Dame is awesome. Loved my experience, the people and learning from your country's perspective rather than mine (for a change). I'll be a fan of Notre Dame and the way it does things, until I die. Much prettier than our campus as well. Canadian schools tend to focus on the quality within the classroom rather than the esthetics outside of them. I can tell you that I enjoyed that at Notre Dame they focused on both! Would have loved to stay for a full year... No way in hell that education is worth upwards of $70,000 per year though after you pay residence costs, pay to eat, have a social life, etc, etc.... Maybe it is for some, but not for me. I always wanted to teach (at the time). I'd rather pay $50,000 for 6 years of education and get $100,000 job out of the deal with great pension and benefits, than get the same type of job (paywise) for 6-8 times the price (over 6 years).
Having attended both American prep and Canadian Secondary school, private Catholic in both cases, going on fifty years ago I can attest that the education in Ontario high school was much more rigorous than even the prestigious prep schools in the Boston area, then.Can't say how it is now though.
 
I have not read every word of this thread but for the salary IIO is talking about it takes 10 years to reach it and our taxes are significantly higher than those living in the USA so it is not the same to compare the salary alone. Also where do the extra two weeks holidays come from? My wife is a teacher and she must be hiding these extra two weeks on me!
 
Nothing official, but I am hearing AJ Dillon (4 star RB/LB) is Ann Arbor bound.

http://247sports.com/Player/AJ-Dillon-77683

Possible, he would fit their system

But people have jumped on Dillon committing to basically every school he's visited (Notre Dame, Florida State, Michigan, etc.)

Notre Dame should continue to have as good of a chance as anyone here, though he's definitely not a lock
 
Thanks for this, where besides recruiting did you see the defense lacking? I've seen a couple of games and been to some practices but didn't think anyone played D in the CIS anymore.

Gael,

Murphy's scheme was fairly sound, I didn't think that was the problem. He knows what he's doing. His defenses led the nation at St. Mary's for several years, albeit in a fairly inferior conference.

Ottawa's defense had 3 issues this year...

1). No replacement for ET Latanzzio after he left for the CFL. He masked a lot of the GeeGees problems in 2014 by being so dominant up front. Ottawa didn't have a DT near as good behind him.

2). Key injuries. Jackson Bennett, the defense's best player separated his shoulder on the 2nd play of the exhibition game against Montreal. It required surgery and he missed the year because of it. That forced Ottawa to move their starting half and best run support defender, Ty Cranston, to free safety to replace Jackson, before the season even began. Marc-Antoine Laurin, Ottawa's WILL linebacker missed half the year with broken ribs. Cranston ended up with a high ankle sprain, which he re-aggravated in the Panda Game. The starting SAM, Mack Tommy missed a number of games as well with an adominal injury. Sam Randazzo, their second best D-lineman ended up with a nasty concussion that cost him half his year. One of the three players that Ottawa brought from Texas (name slips my mind) ended up on crutches from a broken ankle after an incident in which he was returning a punt in practice, etc, etc...

Of their 12 slated starters on defense prior to the start of the year, Their starting SDE, DT, WILL, SAM, FS, HB and NB all missed 3+ games on a an 8 game schedule and many of them missed 5+ games.

It was was never going to be an outstanding defense but it should have been middle-of-the-pack in the OUA and that would have been enough to compliment Barresi's record setting offense. Instead it was a mash unit, that played a lot of freshman and sophomores that we're ready and that directly cost them the Mac and Panda games. Had they been even remotely healthy, they would have won both and would have finished 3rd in the conference, behind Western and Guelph.

Reminded me a lot of the mash unit that was ND's defense in 2014.

3). Two key transfers that Ottawa thought they were going to have right away, both were forced to sit a year. I don't know all the details, but the talented corner from Texas was ordered to sit the year by the AD to make sure he stayed out of trouble before he earned the right to play. The other transfer (whose name I'll keep quiet) completed the transfer, but failed 3 or the 6 summer school credits he needed to be eligible immediately. That was a huge blow as well.

I don't believe Murphy was fired because of his defenses' performance. I think Barresi understood what that defense went through last year and how unlucky they were. IMO, he was let go because he didn't recruit Ontario well enough and before Barresi wanted a French coach, with ties to CEGEPS in Quebec, where Ottawa traditionally gets 5-6 quality players from each year.
 
I have not read every word of this thread but for the salary IIO is talking about it takes 10 years to reach it and our taxes are significantly higher than those living in the USA so it is not the same to compare the salary alone. Also where do the extra two weeks holidays come from? My wife is a teacher and she must be hiding these extra two weeks on me!

Hey Redrum! What school board does your wife teach for I you don't mind me asking out of curiosity?

As it relates to the 10 year build up to max salary (with max qualifications) that is certainly correct.

As it relates to the higher percentage of taxes Canadians pay, I find as someone that lived in the U.S. and has lived in Canada, it's actually exggerated how much it cost them. Yes, we lose considerably more directly off our paychecks, but when you consider the number of "free" things that come with that, the majority of Americans end up spending at or near the difference for insurances policies, medical care, etc, etc. You're correct that The difference still favours US citizens (for the most part) but the wage get is so extreme in between teachers in Ontario vs teachers from a lot of states, that despite the higher taxes, there is still a fairly enormous gap.

Lastly, the "2 weeks holidays" is something that I didn't detail, simply because my post was already lengthy enough. Those holidays are actually accounted for and strategically placed at either end of the summer. At one time teachers were forced to work further into the summer (after classes) were let out and they were forced to report back a week earlier in the fall. The union pushed for holidays for their teachers during the school year, but the province though it was ludicrous (and rightfully so) to allow teachers to simply take time away from their classes during the curriculum. Cutting teachers sick days from 20 to 11/12 was smart as well, IMO. Too many teachers were simply away from their classrooms too often, or were banking a considerable number of those holidays. At one time you could bank them for as long as you wanted. When my dad (a former teacher) retired, he had missed something like 6 days of work in 37 years and had a ridiculous number of sick days banked. He actually used roughly half of his banked sick days to take the final semester off of his final year (essentially retired early) and cashed in the rest for a hefty retirement cheque, which he used to take my mom on a 6 month trip to 3 different continents... It was the right thing to do away that. Back to your wife's "holidays" though. They are paid for and including in pay and the extra time off she has in relation to when she finishes in the spring / summer and when she goes backs in the fall... She doesn't control those holidays, or when she can use them, but they exist never-the-less. That was the agreement the province and the union worked out years ago.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT