The head coach at Troy says hiYou think we should take the opinions of Marcus Freeman and Urban Meyer over the opinions of posters on this board? Whoa.
The Netflix series on Mayer and Florida says hi hi
The head coach at Troy says hiYou think we should take the opinions of Marcus Freeman and Urban Meyer over the opinions of posters on this board? Whoa.
Correct…but a little context:
Worked at Texas -- gone when Herman was fired.
Worked Jacksonville -- gone when Meyer got fired
Worked at Vegas -- gone when McDaniel got fired.
Untold: Swamp Kings (2023) about Florida Gators turn around under Meyer: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt21805972/The head coach at Troy says hi
The Netflix series on Mayer and Florida says hi hi
Good coordinators/coaches do survive coaching regime changes though. The fact that he was never retained by the next coach is a bit of a troubling sign IMO.Coaches on their way out often change coordinators as a last chance move. If a coach is stuck as a travelling fireman he might be in a lot of difficult situations. I used to play annual Where in the World is Diaco?
College head coaches are like professional GMs (in any sport)...they are more than likely to bring in their own guy sooner, if not later...this is especially true if a program is one of your favourite high-valuation, high-revenue programs where there is little financial incentive to keep members of a previous regime to reduce expenses...Good coordinators/coaches do survive coaching regime changes though. The fact that he was never retained by the next coach is a bit of a troubling sign IMO.
The entire notre dame program strikes me that way. It's like the entire university is on a mission to create the most vanilla top 10 college football team in existence incapable of winning anything at the highest level.Ash strikes me as a guy you can win with but not necessarily win because of.
I'll have to disagree on that one. Most coaches want their own guys. Sarkisian brought in a whole new staff at Texas, guys he worked with at UW and Alabama.. Usually you only keep guys when the front office makes it a condition, which to me is a sign of weakness on the HC candidate.Good coordinators/coaches do survive coaching regime changes though. The fact that he was never retained by the next coach is a bit of a troubling sign IMO.
Fair enough. Somehow it doesn't look good on the resume, just at a glance. But it doesn't really mean anything at all, like you say. Other than, if we was so awesome, that the school he was already at insisted that he be allowed to stay on, and some new HC who quite naturally wants his own guys, is willing to bend and accept this interloper essentially, revealing his weakness, because that's just how awesome he is at least in the eyes of his current employer, that would definitely be a feather in his cap. That he could command that kind of contractual stipulation to be imposed upon some new HC. And he was never quite good enough for that.I'll have to disagree on that one. Most coaches want their own guys. Sarkisian brought in a whole new staff at Texas, guys he worked with at UW and Alabama.. Usually you only keep guys when the front office makes it a condition, which to me is a sign of weakness on the HC candidate.
I feel you man. At least half of my posts are praising one area of the program or another but the only posts that people seem to see is the criticism.When I say greathouse played unbelievable in the playoffs and could really break out next year, that comment gets no response.
When I'm complaining about promoting a coach that has failed everywhere coming off a DC that just had the nfl coming after them.
Your posts often require multiple takes because they are packed tight with a lot of content but if you unpack them (mostly figure out whether you are being facetious this time or not) there's a lot of good points being made. Thanks for your contributions here.Fair enough. Somehow it doesn't look good on the resume, just at a glance. But it doesn't really mean anything at all, like you say. Other than, if we was so awesome, that the school he was already at insisted that he be allowed to stay on, and some new HC who quite naturally wants his own guys, is willing to bend and accept this interloper essentially, revealing his weakness, because that's just how awesome he is at least in the eyes of his current employer, that would definitely be a feather in his cap. That he could command that kind of contractual stipulation to be imposed upon some new HC. And he was never quite good enough for that.
I hear you - I wasn't blown away by his resume at first glance, but digging a little deeper, he had top 15 defenses at 3 stops, and his year at Texas, which was a concerning 61 ranking, came in his first year when he inherited a defense ranked 97.Fair enough. Somehow it doesn't look good on the resume, just at a glance. But it doesn't really mean anything at all, like you say. Other than, if we was so awesome, that the school he was already at insisted that he be allowed to stay on, and some new HC who quite naturally wants his own guys, is willing to bend and accept this interloper essentially, revealing his weakness, because that's just how awesome he is at least in the eyes of his current employer, that would definitely be a feather in his cap. That he could command that kind of contractual stipulation to be imposed upon some new HC. And he was never quite good enough for that.
Good coordinators/coaches do survive coaching regime changes though. The fact that he was never retained by the next coach is a bit of a troubling sign IMO.
I've heard of position coaches being retained. I cannot remember any time off the top of my head, that a coordinator was retained when a new regime came in to clean house.College head coaches are like professional GMs (in any sport)...they are more than likely to bring in their own guy sooner, if not later...this is especially true if a program is one of your favourite high-valuation, high-revenue programs where there is little financial incentive to keep members of a previous regime to reduce expenses...
In other words, don't sweat it...
There's to much talent to give him 3 years. He should hit the ground running.He's not being hired for what he did or didn't do. He's being hired for what Freeman believes Ash will do. There were idiots on this board who wanted Freeman and Golden gone in year 1. Give this guy 3 years before passing judgment. Should we trust Freeman's judgment or yours?
Fair point. It's already a top 10 defense, as is with a lot of talent/experience coming back.There's to much talent to give him 3 years. He should hit the ground running.
Sasquatch last spotted with his twerking partner at LSU.Coaches on their way out often change coordinators as a last chance move. If a coach is stuck as a travelling fireman he might be in a lot of difficult situations. I used to play annual Where in the World is Diaco
Really? we cycle through the top performers like Watts.Fair point. It's already a top 10 defense, as is with a lot of talent/experience coming back.
Watts is a big loss, but they got some talented guys and a transfer to compete for his spot. Why can't ND be a top 10 defense?Really? we cycle through the top performers like Watts.
I like your line up. Except Hinish.Watts is a big loss, but they got some talented guys and a transfer to compete for his spot. Why can't ND be a top 10 defense?
Starting D:
Young
Rubio
Hinish
Botelho
KVA
Bowen
Sneed
Gray
Moore
Shuler
Stronman/Blair/Johnson?
You also got these guys behind the starters competing for playing time:
Burnham
Traore
JT
Thomas
Dawson
Mukam
Vernon
Ausberry
Faramio
Zinter
The two Kia dudes
Smith (likely starts at nickel corner)
Urlacher
Talich
I think the best way to utilize the guys at the DT position is to have Rubio and Sevillano (forgot to mention him previous post) play together on 1st down and short yardage situations, as they'll probably be the two best against the run. Then you gotta figure out who's the best against the pass. Dawson will almost certainly be in on obvious passing downs and then we need someone from Hinish, Onye (another guy I forgot to mention) Hughes, Mukam, Vernnon or maybe even Young shifts inside to give us an adequate passing rush. Mills and Cross played way too much as season went on and I'm hoping to see a solid 4-5 man rotation at the DT position.I like your line up. Except Hinish.
I love the kids effort etc.
But we need a big Riley Mills / Jerry tillery etc type guy there. And a couple of those Louis Nix type guys for NT girth and hat on hat type stuff.
Jmo.
I like sevillano myself. Wish he was more of a factor this season.I think the best way to utilize the guys at the DT position is to have Rubio and Sevillano (forgot to mention him previous post) play together on 1st down and short yardage situations, as they'll probably be the two best against the run. Then you gotta figure out who's the best against the pass. Dawson will almost certainly be in on obvious passing downs and then we need someone from Hinish, Onye (another guy I forgot to mention) Hughes, Mukam, Vernnon or maybe even Young shifts inside to give us an adequate passing rush. Mills and Cross played way too much as season went on and I'm hoping to see a solid 4-5 man rotation at the DT position.
Hinish can’t be the starterI like your line up. Except Hinish.
I love the kids effort etc.
But we need a big Riley Mills / Jerry tillery etc type guy there. And a couple of those Louis Nix type guys for NT girth and hat on hat type stuff.
Jmo.