Are we "allowed" to criticize ND football on this board? Or do we only post rainbows and butterflies'???

[Zorich 88]

8 and 3 buddy.

Saline sucks. They are a 1 man show.

Dont try to bullshit me. Not 1 terrible team did they lose to.

Nice try though

Wait a minute. You watched Bedford play how many times????

Man I watch these team week after week.

Bedford sucks!!!!

Check their schedule. Click the opponents. No one has a winning record except Saline.

3 teams only had 1 win!!!!

Schedule - Bedford Kicking Mules (Temperance, MI) Varsity Football 22-23

View the 22-23 Bedford varsity football team schedule.

www.maxpreps.com

 

[Golson5]

Exactly, you said TB was better than Carr. That was my question. Do you believe TB is still better than Carr?

As a junior in high school

I think he is more talented. I cant say better. Buchner missed a ton of his playing career already and missed development. Hes a risk right now and Carr isnt.

So if I had to take one, Id take Carr due to Buchners injuries and lack of reps

 

[Golson5]

Wait a minute. You watched Bedford play how many times????

Man I watch these team week after week.

Bedford sucks!!!!

Check their schedule. Click the opponents. No one has a winning record except Saline.

3 teams only had 1 win!!!!

Schedule - Bedford Kicking Mules (Temperance, MI) Varsity Football 22-23

View the 22-23 Bedford varsity football team schedule.

www.maxpreps.com

8 and 3

They both suck.

They are not terrible compared to the competition they both play

They are terrible if you put them against better schools.

But they are not terrible in that league

Saline is a 3 win team maybe without Carr

Dont bullshit me

 

[Zorich 88]

8 and 3

They both suck.

They are not terrible compared to the competition they both play

They are terrible if you put them against better schools.

But they are not terrible in that league

Saline is a 3 win team maybe without Carr

Dont bullshit me

How am I bullshitting you?????

 

[francade]

As long as the criticism is true, I have no issues w/ it. Although, some here think that if they’re critical of their own team, that somehow validates their criticism, it doesn’t.

 

[burmafrd1943]

As long as the criticism is true, I have no issues w/ it. Although, some here think that if they’re critical of their own team, that somehow validates their criticism, it doesn’t.

but who decides what is true?

Bluntly speaking all there is are opinions; not truth.

 

[francade]

“but who decides what is true?

Bluntly speaking all there is are opinions; not truth.”

That’s the point, they spew their criticism as if it is true w/o a doubt. Then, when they’re wrong about it, crickets. How many “opinions” that were critical ended up not being true around here? Happens all the time. My point is that some think the fact they’re being critical automatically means they’re right. That’s horseshit.

 

[francade]

More to the point, if you push back on the criticism, you’re a gold & blue glasses wearing homer, or a family member of the player the critic is ripping, but if you’re critical, that’s considered “objective realism”. As I said, that’s horseshit.

 

[francade]

Sunshine pumpers aren’t always right, but neither are the critics. Yet, they stand on that perch of objectivity. 🤮

 

[Patrirish]

but who decides what is true?

Bluntly speaking all there is are opinions; not truth.

Not really, there are both !

“Truth” is our won-loss record, “opinion” is how we earned it ! 👍

 

[ftnfan62]

Man, if you give an opinion about ND football that is not filled with sugar and spice and everything nice, people want to cancel you lol.

Nope, I do not believe Carr is the answer at QB

Nope, Tommy should not be fired

Pyne has no business on this roster

Now let the insults begin lol.

Being critical of the team and some players, coaches or calls is what a board is for.

It’s just always the hair pulling by the resident English majors or Socialist that don’t agree with free speech and let you know by calling you names they would only say via a board and never to another man’s face.

 

[Zorich 88]

Being critical of the team and some players, coaches or calls is what a board is for.

It’s just always the hair pulling by the resident English majors or Socialist that don’t agree with free speech and let you know by calling you names they would only say via a board and never to another man’s face.

Exactly

 

[savvyandsassier]

Being critical of the team and some players, coaches or calls is what a board is for.

It’s just always the hair pulling by the resident English majors or Socialist that don’t agree with free speech and let you know by calling you names they would only say via a board and never to another man’s face.

Oh wow, so what do you think you'd do if some socialist tried to rob you of your right to free speech and actually did it right to your face? Think you'd keep your nerve enough to give him the old one two?

Nice to see someone finally take their BK bashing to this baldly outspoken level. As if that wasn't the obvious undercurrent this entire time....

 

[christophero]

This seems to be an issue with every board. As long as it's respectful, you should be able to talk about flaws. It's what coaches do. And if they are not being corrected it should be called out. Saying "it'll all be okay trust the process" is a valid point, but not the only valid point and would be a bit boring if everyone thought this way.