First off, Happy New Year to everyone.... her's hoping 2021 proves better than the abomination that was 2020. And congrats to The Irish on a very good season (can't call it great when you get blown out in last two games).
I thought
@MikeGoolsby had some good points, but instead of the movie Sharknado, it seems like more like Groundhog Day to me, both the results of the game and the board reaction. Regarding the board, it's pretty much always the same.... after a big game loss, a lot of posters who you never hear from, get on clamoring for Kelly to be fired, that ND is a farce, etc. About 24-48 hours late, you have the guardians of all things ND, who claim all is well, we are a rch away from being National Champions, everyone who disagrees is a "bedwetter" etc. IMHO, like most things in life, it falls somewhere in the middle.
Notre Dame is most definitely improved.... Stevie Wonder can see that. At the same time the gap between the Irish and the true elite is as wide as ever. So, the million dollar question is how do you narrow that gap?
1. Speed kills. I agreed with some others that we looked slow today, as we did against Clemson part deux.
Especially our db's and wr's. I think it is painfully evident when matched up against the Bamas, Clemsons, Buckeyes, etc. The funny thing is this is probably the fastest/quickest team ND has had in a while, from top to bottom.
In some ways we are more like a Big 10 team- Mich St., Wisconsin, etc, than an SEC team.
How does this change? Kelly and co. seem more enamored with db's who possess length and big receivers than with burners.
Will this work in today's game? A game that is vastly different than even ten years ago?
2. Recruiting. I loathe the "X's and O's , Jimmy's and Joe's quote, as it's always a combo.
You take the exact same team with various head coaches, and you will get various results.
But it still seem we miss on too many of the kids who are the "ND" type. Too many late offers.
I am not close to the program, just a fan, but I have a few friends that are close, and for years they have hinted about, to put it nicely, the inconsistency in the work ethic of Kelly and Co. (especially Kelly) regarding recruiting. I don't want to put anyone on the spot, but would love to hear opinions, especially from staff.
Is there any truth to this, or is it Bullsh$t?
3. Goolsby also brought up something that needs to be at least considered in taking some kids that normally would not be admitted. If they are good kids, and are willing to work if given an opportunity, I think the risk is worth the reward . Tony Rice and John Foley were prop 48 athletes that were given an opportunity and ran with it, including the latter helping the Irish to a natty, and both graduating and being great, classy ambassadors for The University. To me that's not only not lowering your standards, but practicing what a lot may say is the true mission of a Catholic university.
To add to that, how many football players (and all other athletes) get accepted to ND if they don't participate in athletics)? No Bullsh&t here. Under 1%? If that? I, for one am extremely proud of ND doing things the right way, but it could just be possible, that over time, some become more concerned with graduation rate numbers, than attempting to take a chance and possibly change someone's life while becoming better as a football team?
I don't think at least giving this a try is equivalent to the lowering of standards. Thoughts?
4. The biggest elephant in the room is the QB situation. I have never ripped a player, and am not about to start,
but when Ian Book is the most accomplished QB in your tenure as HC, questions need to be raised.
I love Book. He is a gamer and a winner. He is also extremely limited, and has almost a weird variant of the yips, where he is seemingly afraid to throe the ball downfield. With ND's line and running attack, you can win even with the large disadvantage, but can you do it against the elite?
The funny thing is, he seemed to have overcame that this year, that is until the last two games.
Speaking of regression, hasn't that been the story of QB's under BK?
Every single QB has seemed to transfer, move to another position or regress, have they not?
Is it that Kelly can't recruit elite QB's or can't develop them? It has to be one of the two, if not both.
It is fair to say that Kelly's success with QB's at ND has been a tremendous disappointment. How are you ever going to narrow the gap with such a disadvantage in the most important position in the game?
You simply cannot win at the highest level of college football, without at least the threat of a vertical passing game. Al Davis is rolling over in his grave.
5. Kelly. What a divisive figure he has become to ND fans.
Personally, I'm up and down with him. He has built an extremely good, and pretty damn consistent program, and deserves credit for that. He also can't seem to win the big game, or address some glaring limitations.
Serious question, name five wins against elite teams under BK? OK, name three? Two? I would love to hear the answers.
What concerned me about his press conference, was not that he was salty. You should be upset after an L, or find another profession. He certainly tore Sampson a new as$hole. It was that in listening to him, it appears he genuinely believes there is not a genuine gap between ND and the elite. I'm paraphrasing, but to say the ND was in it the whole time, and that we are virtually even with Bama has me wondering..... How can you address and rectify the deficiencies in a program if you can't see them? We have all heard coach speak, I don't think BK was doing that today.
I am definitely not saying get rid of him. BK, I believe, will be at ND as long as he wishes, and has earned the right to be.
I just think he has hit his zenith, and as good as a program that ND is currently, will never seriously have a chance at a title.
Sorry for the long post, met up with an old friend tonight named Johnny Walker Gold, and we are doing some catching up.