Resetting Expectations
- By cmck
- The Insider Lounge
- 14 Replies
This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.
It was a bad call regardless of outcome.And if the result of that second down and one play is a Touchdown, you would never say after the game...... "bad call..."
The only reason you do is because Riley Leonard missed bad.
To add to this post: here's the measuring stick I like to use when I'm trying to determine how good a win is, a recruiting class is, a talent ranking, a position group, etc.Good posts throughout and I always enjoy reading your thoughts and analysis on ND football.
I do however disagree with the Texas A&M win being a "confirmation that ND is a very good team"
Texas A&M is ranked 21st according to latest F+ ranking (through week 2).
Texas A&M recruited really well under Jimbo Fisher and there are still some really highly rated players on their roster, but that whole program has been in disarray for years now, and they are under an entirely new regime with tons of roster attrition, learning a new scheme, new culture, etc.
They are more of a program we should beat in year 3 under MF to confirm that ND isn't a bad team .. but that's probably as far i would go with it.
As the game changes, enough older fans will ADAPT while younger ones WON'T KNOW FROM ANYTHING DIFFERENT.European soccer couldn't be any more popular and they have the same model and always have and the best, richest clubs have always dominated. They implemented some sort of spending limit regime in some leagues not that it's made any difference. And it's been ever thus in CFB with dominant powers always being dominant, always hoarding the best players and always monopolizing the MNC, and it's seemingly gotten even more popular in the last ten, twenty years when it's become even more one-sided. So I think that this article is stupid. What they say made CFB popular is not what makes it popular. It's just high level tackle football, it's a popular spectator sport. There's nothing like it in the world. If anything supercoferences might make it even more popular, with more substantial matchups and less throwaway games. I do wish they could find a way to keep the conferences regional and still find a way to make everyone happy financially.
And if the result of that second down and one play is a Touchdown, you would never say after the game...... "bad call..."I blame Denbrock and Riley
Bad call. Awful throw
2nd at 1 at the 50 with the lead and the clock moving. Get the first down
I blame Denbrock and RileyMike Denbrock is not to blame.
Blame Riley Leonard. All on him.
If you are going to miss, do not miss short.
Mike Denbrock is not to blame.Not at that point of the game you don't. Bad play call. Even worse throw
He does have talent/potential. It's 2 games into the season. 1 solid game. 1 terrible game.But hes your golden boy. Reilly the dude with so much talent/potential, LOL. Are you going to continue to tell us he how great he is? Or admit once in your fricking life that you were wrong and the guy stinks
Unfortunately, THINGS CHANGE. And as more time elapses, no no knows -- OR EVEN CARES -- if it was for the better or not.Interesting info in this link . . .
College football walks a fine line between growth and alienating its fan base
No American sport can match college football’s tradition, rivalries, game-day experience or the value of each game during the regular season. The sport is positioned to become even bigger, but it’s also at risk of abandoning the elements that made it so great in the first place.www.sportsbusinessjournal.com
He won the strong arm competition at the Manning camp. His arm is fine. That throw had nothing to do with arm strengthQuit listening to Brian Driscoll. Read actual scouting reports, what most NFL scouts think of Leonard, and not some weird exception. Even his report coming out of HS was that he didn't have a strong arm. You are complete tool. You know nothing about evaluating talent, you sir are a fraud.
People been saying the same thing about Notre Dame post Rockne era until a coach comes along and maximizes the football program and ND goes on a dominant tier 1 run *yet again*. It's a story that spans the test of time and one of the reasons why people love & hate this football program so much.Texas - before beating USC in 2005, previous natty was 1969 (I'm not giving them 1970 after we beat them in the Cotton Bowl)...46 years
Michigan - before 1997, previous natty was 1949...48 years...
It happens till the saviour comes along...we're waiting for the saviour, and being Catholic, we're used to it....
Why do you hate the prospect of ND being the #1 program in college football again so much?
lol. True.Poor Mike Elko.
And Terry BrennanHe left out Knute Rockne.
Poor Mike Elko.Poor to dreadful QB play. A really really young inexperienced line. No deep threat and only one possession receiver. Defense cannot stop the run. 11.5 favorite? No friggin way.
Texas - before beating USC in 2005, previous natty was 1969 (I'm not giving them 1970 after we beat them in the Cotton Bowl)...46 yearsLast NC, 1988. Nuff said.
He thinks he does🥱...tell us some more about ND football and recruiting🥱...you couldn't spot talent if Ana de Armas fell in your lap! You haven't been right about a QB since you've been on this board. At least your not a sheep but, it ain't saying much considering you act like every word out of your mouth is factual...based on your assessments I don’t think you know shit!