Some good news on the offensive side
- Under the Dome
- 4 Replies
That’s good news. If spindler is out to we make some moves ? Or stay with has worked this season ?
What about sevillano ? Why no one here is taking about him? Is he being redshirted ? Is he hurt ?Yikes, 3 man rotation of Cross, Hinish, Rubio. Wonder if they’ll try Oben in the interior? DL depth was a major concern heading into the season and may cost ND- how will they stop the UGA rushing attack.
You just like those QBs more because they are part of ND's lore, and some of them went on to NFL success. Ian Book is an all-time great ND QB, indubitably. Not just statistically. He led us to two playoff berths, and he was the engine of the offense. And of course, he was associated with BK. As well as the fact that he was lightly recruited, too low rent for ND fans, who value prestige above all else.Clausen, Quinn, Mirer, Rice, Montana, Clements, Theismann, Hanratty, Huarte, Horning, Williams, Guglielmi, Lujack, Bertelli…as good as a serviceable quarterback Book was anyone believing he is an all time great needs to study a lot more ND history for their opinion to be taken seriously. Study more, post less young fella
What else can we do but soldier on.So we're going to soldier on then, right?
They're probably going to go to 16, and I have no problem with it myself, even though it does dilute the sanctity of the regular season even further, while simultaneously making it even more exciting and engaging. And they get to pander to the SEC that way. They can get their six teams in every year. And think of how epic that first weekend will be, it will truly be a match for the opening two rounds of the men's BB tourney. They might have to make it two auto bids for the G5 though.You know what? I have a solution. 16 teams in 4 groups of 4. Not 1st round byes.
You randomly pick from a pot of ranks as you fill in groups. Starting top to bottom. Just like soccer.
Do it like this:
1st assign from ranking 1-4:
2nd assign from ranking 5-8:
3rd assign from ranking 9-12:
Lastly assign from ranking: 13-16.
Every team has 4 games to play to win a NC. As balanced as possible. Maybe apply some conference separation rules?
This still won't avoid some tough paths, but it won't be so egregious like Penn State being so lucky vs Oregon State.
Easy there killer....RL has NFL-level pocket presence and escapability (he's not a Book-like scrambler). He is an elite athlete with real size who is still learning to be a QB. I predict he will play on Sundays --but I believe it will take some time as a backup. Book was a warrior who gave us a lot of wins. The Georgia game will decide if Riley is an ND QB for the ages.
Your PSU example is a good one. But OSU’s loss to Mich inspired such.FIFA is a horrible organization but they get tournament seedings and distribution correct for the most part. Sometimes a 1/2 bracket might be a bit tougher, but that is inevitable. Again, there is usually 1 group of death, just on stats...but not bad considering how large a tournament.
College football will improve. I also have no issue with the conference champion getting a 1st round bye...but yes, they then should have used rank and conference distribution. Actually, much as you and I are ok with conference champion getting a bye, that is indeed the problem...it might be better to use ranking, which should heavily use SOS.
Irony: Penn State got basically handed a path to the semifinal while OSU, Oregon, and Tennessee were handed a gauntlet.
No question.Do you think Leonard gets drafted?
Clausen, Quinn, Mirer, Rice, Montana, Clements, Theismann, Hanratty, Huarte, Horning, Williams, Guglielmi, Lujack, Bertelli…as good as a serviceable quarterback Book was anyone believing he is an all time great needs to study a lot more ND history for their opinion to be taken seriously. Study more, post less young fellaHe is an all-time great great QB in ND's history. Full stop. Period. Deal with it.
Penn St. were big beneficiaries for sure, with this cockamamie seeding. Honestly, just ignore the first round byes with respect to conference affiliation. Just seed them purely on the power ratings and be done with it. An auto bid is sufficient.
I was only addressing Wimbush vs Leonard’s running ability.You can believe whatever you want, all of you guys are insanely biased, anything associated with BK sucks, and anything associated with MF is better. Period. That's not a controversial statement to make about ND fans. As long as there's even a sliver of room for plausibly debatable opinion, then of course RL is better at everything. Nobody who's not invested in hating BK the way ND fans are would agree. Maybe a few would think RL is better, and some would think Wimbush was better. If they ever paused to think about it or study their highlight reel. Their statistics were similar. I would imagine Denbrock was game-planning ahead of time in anticipation of RL's limitations as a passer, while Wimbush's passing struggles I think were more of a shock to the coaches, who had to scramble on the fly, when he first became the starter. Both teams had a good stable of RBs. And Wimbush's OL was awesome, thankfully.
They're very similar as QBs in their relative strengths and weaknesses, Wimbush ran more like a power RB, and Denbrock runs more like a lanky WR.
You can believe whatever you want, all of you guys are insanely biased, anything associated with BK sucks, and anything associated with MF is better. Period. That's not a controversial statement to make about ND fans. As long as there's even a sliver of room for plausibly debatable opinion, then of course RL is better at everything. Nobody who's not invested in hating BK the way ND fans are would necessarily agree. Maybe a few would think RL is better, and some would think Wimbush was better. If they ever paused to think about it or study their highlight reel. Their statistics were similar. I would imagine Denbrock was game-planning ahead of time in anticipation of RL's limitations as a passer, while Wimbush's passing struggles I think were more of a shock to the coaches, who had to scramble on the fly, when he first became the starter. Both teams had a good stable of RBs. And Wimbush's OL was awesome, thankfully.I do not at all believe that Wimbush was a better runner than Leonard. Leonard is probably the best running QB ND has since the 40’s or something.
It’s worth mentioning that ND is clobbering people so there are less opportunities for big plays from Leonard.
Do you think Leonard gets drafted?RL has NFL-level pocket presence and escapability (he's not a Book-like scrambler). He is an elite athlete with real size who is still learning to be a QB. I predict he will play on Sundays --but I believe it will take some time as a backup. Book was a warrior who gave us a lot of wins. The Georgia game will decide if Riley is an ND QB for the ages.
I wouldWould you consider Quinn an all-time great?
Would you consider Quinn an all-time great?Nonsense. I highly doubt that when a legitimate discussion of all time great Notre Dame football players is being debated that Ian Book is ever mentioned. Talk about recency bias.
You're contradicting yourself by saying RL is better than Wimbush (who has absolutely nothing to do with this conversation) and then saying Wimbush had more explosive plays than RL. Just stop. You don't get to 12 wins as a starting QB without big play ability. If you can't see that, then I dunno what to tell you. You're only one here making that claim.Yeah, I do watch the games, what are all his big plays? To me RL is a somewhat better version of Brandon Wimbush, if even that. And that's about it. RL is a better passer, and will make the occasional nice TD pass if we pick our spots, but he's sufficiently shitty enough that the offense has to deliberately hamstring itself, and it's up to our offensive braintrust to make sure we don't ask too much of him. Which so far they've been brilliant at.
And I'm just wondering what big plays does he make? How many 40 yard plus TD runs does he have? How is he different than Wimbush in that way, who probably had more explosive runs, and more explosive pass plays. RL happens to be accurate and reliable enough with the dink and dunk stuff that you can use him for that, and the pass game can still be productive. And that was Wimbush's problem, he couldn't hit the easy passes. But he could make beautiful long bombs and downfield throws, aka 'explosive plays'. And he was probably a better runner than RL.
Hey man...You need mental help, sir. You seriously do.
Book was ok but trying to put him in great or legendary status is a huge stretch.He is an all-time great great QB in ND's history. Full stop. Period. Deal with it.