ADVERTISEMENT

Oregon is not ready to play

So much for the playoff needs to be reformatted narrative. Oregon's the #1 seed. And they're getting spanked like they were lucky to beat a G5 team like Boise St. when they did.

In any event losing to Michigan was a blessing in disguise for tOSU.
That's a POd OSU team right now......Oh, and talented

I read on ESPN a while back that OSU could have 16 to 18 players drafted in the next NFL draft which would break the record of 15 by Georgia around 3 or 4 years ago. Saying that OSU is absolutely loaded is a huge understatement

Oregon is not ready to play

Bro, ND is offering as much as the top programs, but these top athletes don't want to be bothered by academics. They don't want to go to class. ND won't compromise on that, get used to it @sshole.


True about the academic restrictions. But that is not as limiting as it once was. Suddenly ND has the other said factors to get more of the best top athletes that can hang with the academics...perhaps even having more depth than transitory volatile programs.

Only Ohio State seems to have a bit more here...I don't think ND is inferior to any other program right now in depth.

Oregon is not ready to play

Notre Dame has some of the deepest pockets in the sport.

Not saying this to you directly, but why do ND fans like to act like ND is this indie band starting in their garage? ND is the biggest most mainstream most wealthy most old money brand in the sport. Or at least easily in the first tier of programs that are. They are just insanely cheap, and ND fans give them a pass for it under the "education first" rhetoric that ND uses to stuff their coffers and make them disgustingly wealthy beyond belief.


I've consistently posted on ND being a beneficiary...on brand, stability, select transfers, and vast NIL potential. I even posted how the talent gap is IRONICALLY shifting in ND favor.

But although this is true...Ohio State is the leader in this right now.

Game moved to Thursday Night

I work in AI. Data can be securely anonymized. Encryption. Where you need:

1) Encryption key material to un-encrypt.
2) Legal permission and the appropriate authentication and authorization....be it a human or bot.

Let the bots have access to anonymized real time streaming & historical data. Every 30 seconds or so they can apply threat, intrusion, and anomaly detection algorithms. If they get a positive signal, alerts are sent to human authorities for the said encryption, authentication, and authorization needed to concretely identify the suspects.

And sure, the opinions and experiences of victims matter. Protecting life is important and, as I discussed, can be done with regards for privacy, security, and freedom.
Okay well, you know how I feel, and I'm not sympathetic. But indeed, this is a highly technical, esoteric sort of thing, I don't pretend to any knowledge of the latest encryption techniques, so I'm in no position to differ on that score. Let's just say I wouldn't want to empower and entrust all this computer technology, however possible to only be used for good as it were, to our national security state. But I guess we just don't see eye to eye on that score.

And besides, I feel like saying that I'm confident that the govt. already possesses what they need, legally and technically, to be able to snoop around enough to sniff these things out. I guess they just missed this one. Which of course elicits demands for even greater access with more intrusive technology. And the tech is always improving and advancing and situation continually shifting and updating. And on and on it goes. What else could a layman do, but hand over his fate to the Silicon Valley and the collective computer cognoscenti, and try to remain an optimist.

Anyway, it looks like the game is on for tomorrow night, knock on wood. And my apologies to anyone offended by my outspoken dismissing of what turns out to apparently be an actual terrorist attack. I thought it was just a crazy dude driving his truck through a crowd.

Attack on Bourbon St

We have different views on the pace and direction that factions of Islam are moving

The difference is you seem to think Islam is monolithic and innately evil. It's not. I never sugarcoat that overall Islamic cultures have some serious issues...to the point where varied Islamic interests can coalesce and do damage at scale.

But Islam itself is as malleable to exegesis as Judaism and Christianity, its peer Abrahamic faiths, have been. Again, they're still stuck in backwardness. It's not easy to move into the future.

Today we saw it. Clearly we have a problem. But let's not lose our humanity in fighting it. Keep in mind, we were both effective yet magnanimous in victory vs the WWII Axis and former Warsaw Pact.

Attack on Bourbon St

Just like the Catholic Church once did, Islam needs a process of exegesis. I am sure you heard that term. The Islamic world is working itself in modernity.

Obviously it is a painful and costly process. Mostly to themselves. There is massive strife in Islamic societies, costing many lives, loss of GDP, and a cycle of violence.

At such scale, it hurts the world. Even in Islamic communities in the West. This is going to be a long enough process.
We have different views on the pace and direction that factions of Islam are moving

Game moved to Thursday Night

Right. So why is this happening? Are our armed forces and our government not doing enough to prevent this from happening? Did this guy ask for help and was told, take a number?
being frustrated in life …then turning to ISIS and planning with others to run over people with a bomb in your truck…and plant bombs over a few blocks in a city….is a pretty big pivot.

Game moved to Thursday Night

So it is. I spoke too soon. I was watching the games and the initial report I glanced at didn't mention terrorism and it appeared to have enough of the hallmarks of a loan gunman type scenario, which would not be at all surprising in this country. Where those things happen all the time to varying degrees of death and destruction, and if this guy was a vet as reported, he might be more inclined to go ham with it. And in any case it didn't sound like a terrorist attack at first blush. And it's nevertheless true that the war on terror is never ending, and is almost like a self fulfilling prophecy.

I don't want to get in an argument over this but I don't care what the families think. Grieving families don't decide policy for an entire nation. And there's no evidence that I'm privy to at least that advanced surveillance is implemented with any of the safeguards you allude to. The direct opposite is indeed the whole point of domestic surveillance.


I work in AI. Data can be securely anonymized. Encryption. Where you need:

1) Encryption key material to un-encrypt.
2) Legal permission and the appropriate authentication and authorization....be it a human or bot.

Let the bots have access to anonymized real time streaming & historical data. Every 30 seconds or so they can apply threat, intrusion, and anomaly detection algorithms. If they get a positive signal, alerts are sent to human authorities for the said encryption, authentication, and authorization needed to concretely identify the suspects.

And sure, the opinions and experiences of victims matter. Protecting life is important and, as I discussed, can be done with regards for privacy, security, and freedom.

Game moved to Thursday Night

I just went over the whole 'terrorism' labeling, and I would say it's not because it's an act of terrorism, because it isn't one. It's what I said it is. You're denying that, and saying this isn't just another school shooting, enacted by a bullied kid. Even though it is, the difference is he drove a truck through a busy tourist area, whatever his personal situation was, instead of shooting up a wal-mart. But if you arbitrarily label it as such, and just expand the definition to include lone wolf acts of mass violence, then you get to politically take advantage of it, because everyone's all horrified. And I'm pretty sure we have dozens of very significant mass shootings every year in this country.

The word 'terrorism', semantically refers to the idea of blowing up bombs in a Paris subway or something, in the hopes of the govt. meeting your political demands, And so you 'terrorize' the public until they give in, and keep them in a state of terror. This is nothing like that. There'd be no basis for good-faith categorizing it as terrorism.
Shut up sjb
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT