Bodizephax
I've posted how many times?
Who cares why he is Prolife as long as he is. Oh I'm sorry I didn't say "rabid" prolife like you do.
Students To Walk Out During Commencement
- Thread starter irish4life888
- Start date
Who cares why he is Prolife as long as he is. Oh I'm sorry I didn't say "rabid" prolife like you do.
I agree but his point about inviting Obama still stands. Pathetic for a so-called Catholic University to hand out an honorary degree to a man with the most influence in the world who actively supports murder.. yikes.
And how do you know that? Many people who at one time were pro abortion, yes that's what I call it, like Trump, have now changed their opinion due to the type of diagnostic technology that exists today. Three D images showing even at 8 weeks, you can clearly see a living human being in a mother's womb. This type of technological imagery has changed the minds of millions of people.
I know personally many HCP's who no longer perform abortions due to this technology.
I have no concrete data to form an opinion. Remember if is the Muslim community suffering more from terrorists than it is an American community. I presume the locals helping the American forces over the years fit your category and there are likely others that we will never know about or hear their stories. I do not presume to speak for those others nor do I try to make a conclusion from a supposed absence of evidence.
Except no university will apply a litmus test. A critical point is to have a variety of opinions. The commencement honor and honorary degree is Notre Dame wanting to establish a tradition regarding the presidency.
It would be pathetic of Notre Dame, or any Catholic university, to honor only those who agreed with the administration's views. Secretary of Education DeVos seems to clearly lack understanding of a broad education, but I expect she will get many invitations to give commencement addresses.
This board is full of spoiled snowflake crybabys who call for Brian Kellys job whenever he loses a game. Why? Because these chodes cant achieve a single victory in their own sad lives, so they have to achieve by proxy through ND Football
Seems to me some of these no life losers had offspring. Pathetic sad bunch of losers.
Seems to me some of these no life losers had offspring. Pathetic sad bunch of losers.
Trump doesn't strike me as someone who's particularly genuine. He thought that women who had abortions should be criminally punished (which very few, if any, pro-life people believe) and then had to be told afterward that apparently that's not the usual pro-life stance.
We will agree to disagree.
The Demcrats thought the same about Republicans under Obama. Now the shoe is on the other foot. No difference.
http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/l...-Student-Stabbed-Killed-at-UMd-423505764.html
"Sean Urbanski has been charged with first- and second-degree murder as well as first-degree assault in the death of Richard Collins III. Urbanski is white and Collins was black. 22-year-old Urbanski is a member of a Facebook group called "Alt Reich: Nation," where members post racially charged material."
Oh, I don't think Obama ever had it so bad much less a threat of impeachment with no documented evidence in the first 200 days.
I do agree about agreeing to disagree with you. If everyone thought alike the world would be a bland shade of gray.
so they don't walk out on obama and his late term abortion views but they walk out on the pro life VP
why are you at a catholic university again ?
why are you at a catholic university again ?
Fault your guy for that. He seems to be a magnet for mistakes. If impeachment comes, it will start on Republican side.
Impeachment.... funny stuff. You have a better chance of gaining some intelligence.
#MAGA
Was that supposed to counter the premise that these are "fringe" groups? Or just provide interesting reading material?
No. It was to counter the contention that "these white power groups pose no threat to the United States because they don't have enough followers".
Liberal policies fail. THe dream is not to collect welfare or work at mcDonalds.
No one is arguing that we should ignore these home grown radical groups, but it is disingenuous to argue that we should focus our resources to protect us against their potential actions at the expense of ignoring the real threat posed by radical Islamic terrorist. It's not an either or debate that some liberals are posturing. Do you honestly believe that the level of foreign terrorist activity in this country is a static level regardless of the immense anti terrorist actions taken by our government?No. It was to counter the contention that "these white power groups pose no threat to the United States because they don't have enough followers".
That doesn't mean it's not a fringe group. And anyways, there are also examples that can be cited from the opposite end of the spectrum, like the black sniper who shot a bunch of Dallas police officers last year.
How many murders in this country each year? How many of those murders involved terrorists?
Terrorists did not destroy the inner city schools.
No one is arguing that terrorist destroyed our inner city schools! Just another example of manufacturing a false choice, something Obama excelled at.
It's obvious google is his best friend. The fact that this guy won't admit that these type of violence acts happen across all racial lines makes him not credible at all. He googles, then posts. We can do the same as a counter point. Perhaps he should spend a couple of weeks in Chicago and stand on his soapbox trying to make excuses for all the black on black violence in that city. If you can't admit and agree on facts that don't fit your personal agenda then you have nothing. I'm not even sure what his point is in the first place.
I do not agree that it is the liberals posturing on this issue. The idea of anti-Muslim policies was a prime claim of one of the candidates while slowly and insufficiently declining the support of the KKK and Alt-right hate groups. Sessions has followed this idea with spending more effort on low level drug crimes and non-violent immigrants than on hate crimes.
This is not an Obama vs. Trump issue; this is an issue where the current administration is wrongly aiming at the wrong target, particularly Sessions.
Whites tend to live around other whites and the violent crime in those areas tends to be white on white. Same goes for blacks. If you stop reciting the FOXNews hot takes and spend a minute to think for yourself, you don't need Google.
How many hate crimes are there? Not enough IMHO, since the government seems dead set on never defining any violent crime committed by any minority against a white person a hate crime. And I personally abhor hate crimes, and believe they should be punished in strict conformance with the law. But we need to get far away from this wacky idea that racism and hate are in some way limited to white people.
I don't need google because I live in the real world. Born and raised and live in Gary, Indiana so you are preaching to the wrong cat. I don't even know what your point is. I don't even think you know.
More like pro birth. The Republicans tend to forget about a childs welfare once they are born.
We know. You already said that in another thread. You are repeating the same general talking point and it ain't going nowhere fast.
Granite, I agree that Trump was slow and somewhat muted in his initial denouncing the support of the KKK and David Duke, et al... somewhat reminiscent of Obama's delayed and muted denouncing the support and anti America and anti White rhetoric of Jeremiah Wright. In my opinion, both were appalling. Trumps initial attacks against Muslim's in general were equally unacceptable, but he later significantly modified his rhetoric and policies to specifically target radical Muslim terrorists, and the countries where the governments are not reliable in providing background info, etc... The liberal media and most Dems choose to conveniently ignore the more moderate rhetoric and resulting policies, as the former better serves their narrative. Aside from the proposed travel ban and enforcing the existing laws of the land, not sure what your gripe is about Sessions? Has he done anything that suggests he is soft on Hate Crimes?
Nobody can make sense of his posts
Head of the tin foil hat group.
Oh yea, republicans are evil
more legitimate dem talking points
Hillary ran on that , but fortunately for us, thats all she had
She needed a p-ssy grabber, unless you count Bill. He's not the self-proclaimed grabber that the president is though.
Last edited:
I don't think she has ever had to worry about that. Caitlin Jenner might be more worried about that.
#MAGA
Similar threads
