Maybe we just focus on beating Indiana before we start complaining about playing Georgia, but that’s just me.
It will be interesting to see the fan turn out. May not be at home game.Indiana is good but beatable. And we play at home, unlike a typical bowl game. I think we advance. I think ND will be motivated to not lose to an Indiana team.
It is. We have the 2nd hardest path. I think psu got the easiest pathBTW: if anybody got screwed, it is Ohio State versus Tennessee then vs Oregon. Sure seems like the hardest path to me.
True. Bias for conf membership on display, particularly in regard to PSU.
It is. We have the 2nd hardest path. I think psu got the easiest path
Georgia is way better than Arizona State.Clemson vs Texas then Arizona State is no slouch. Texas doesn't have it easy here. Arizona State is interesting, no juggernaut, but look better than I thought they'd be.
Georgia is way better than Arizona State.
Indiana and Clemson are similar
In my opinion
If you really think that, it means you don't think much of ND.Penn St does absolute nothing all year and gets the easiest path possible.
ESPN said we had the easiest path.
Their experts also mostly predicted Notre Dame as the 5 seed.ESPN said we had the easiest path.
Last night, you were implying that Georgia's defense wasn't any good, so we should just roll over them.2nd hardest path behind osu
No its means they werent dominate vs a light B1G schedule & their best resume results are close losses. We had 2 common opp.'s ND was far more impressive than PSU was against those teams. PSU got rewarded with the easiest path out of all the non bye teams dont think thats fair based on their body of work.If you really think that, it means you don't think much of ND.
I did? Can you show me where I said that because that is absolutely inaccurate.Last night, you were implying that Georgia's defense wasn't any good, so we should just roll over them.
Just watched the Arizona state running back talking.Georgia is way better than Arizona State.
Indiana and Clemson are similar
In my opinion
But you were saying yesterday that Georgia's defense wasn't any good. Maybe their starting QB is out, too. And didn't I see their punter, who flips the field often for that lousy defense, leave on a cart with a serious knee injury?I agree Georgia is better than ASU. And that ND does have the harder path. I'd definitely flip brackets with Texas.
But I'm unsure about the degree of difference.
I could be wrong, but ASU seems peaking at the right time and better than I thought. They looked pretty good. Same with Penn State as we discussed...things get clearer when all the games are played.
But you were saying yesterday that Georgia's defense wasn't any good. Maybe their starting QB is out, too. And didn't I see their punter, who flips the field often for that lousy defense, leave on a cart with a serious knee injury?
BS. I guess head to head etc doesn’t matter2-loss Ohio State won at 2-loss Penn State.
OSU lost by 1 at Oregon, Penn State lost by 8 to Oregon at a neutral site.
Penn State a 6, Ohio St. an 8.
SMH
Totally agree! Think the Irish can beat the Hoosiers and the Dawgs!Hell, I’m just stoked we’re in the playoffs. Hope Freeman and the players have a chip on their shoulders, and focus entirely on Indiana and their 11-1 record. It’s the only matchup where our home field advantage is minimized. If we think we are NC quality, then our path is very doable. We damn well better have Cross available and playing at a high level. Our lack of pressure from our edges is a glaring weakness. Hope Golden can continue to work his magic with disguised blitzes, etc… to compensate. Beat the damn Hossiers!
Clemson has the kind of roster that can hang with almost anybody.Georgia is way better than Arizona State.
Indiana and Clemson are similar
In my opinion
👍Maybe we just focus on beating Indiana before we start complaining about playing Georgia, but that’s just me.
LOL...Sorry I thought I was replying to Golson, who was dismissive of my comment that both the Georgia and Texas defenses looked fast and strong. (He cited Georgia's performance against Georgia Tech.) Now today, he says we have the toughest path. I wanted to ask him what changed his opinion overnight?I don’t remember saying Georgia’s defense is not good. I actually have been saying it is very good. Somebody pointed out having more 5 stars than ND…which I said doesn’t indicate superiority to ND. I’m also thinking ND can get enough points vs their D.
Georgia and Texas have elite defenses from what I saw.
Well you are wrong again. And like I responded earlier, bring up where I said Georgia had a bad defense. I did not. I said they played bad against GT. They didLOL...Sorry I thought I was replying to Golson, who was dismissive of my comment that both the Georgia and Texas defenses looked fast and strong. (He cited Georgia's performance against Georgia Tech.) Now today, he says we have the toughest path. I wanted to ask him what changed his opinion overnight?
Go back and read the "Another Boring SEC Championship thread. I mentioned that I thought both Georgia and Texas had excellent D's and your first response was a laugh; then when I followed up, you cited their performance against Georgia Tech.I did? Can you show me where I said that because that is absolutely inaccurate.
I said that about Oregon’s defense
I said Georgia's defense was bad against GT, they were
Exactly. I've said many times Georgia has a good defense and they got beat up by GT.Go back and read the "Another Boring SEC Championship thread. I mentioned that I thought both Georgia and Texas had excellent D's and your first response was a laugh; then when I followed up, you cited their performance against Georgia Tech.
Context means something. So when I said Georgia has a great defense, and you cited their poor performance Georgia Tech, it's obvious by context what you meant.Well you are wrong again. And like I responded earlier, bring up where I said Georgia had a bad defense. I did not. I said they played bad against GT. They did
I also did not say we had the toughest path. I said the 2nd toughest path
So at least try to be accurate with what I said.
You went 0 for 2 here
Ah...go back and read what I actually laughed at.Context means something. So when I said Georgia has a great defense, and you cited their poor performance Georgia Tech, it's obvious by context what you meant.
Did Penn State deserve a higher seed over Ohio St?Ah...go back and read what I actually laughed at.
You said both teams would handle ND quite easily. And I would still laugh at you for that.
We would compete with both
I'm not going to waste any more time with this, but read through the exchange. You wouldn't have cited Georgia's performance against Georgia Tech if you were agreeing they had an excellent defense, The thing about you is that you think you are right all of the time. You are right half the time, The rest of the time you are full of shit.Ah...go back and read what I actually laughed at.
You said both teams would handle ND quite easily. And I would still laugh at you for that.
We would compete with both
Now you aren't going to waste anymore time because you know what I actually laughed at was your BS comment that we can't compete with Georgia or TexasI'm not going to waste any more time with this, but read through the exchange. You wouldn't have cited Georgia's performance against Georgia Tech if you were agreeing they had an excellent defense, The thing about you is that you think you are right all of the time. You are right half the time, The rest of the time you are full of shit.