Yawn.Another 2020 hindsight genius
Yawn.Another 2020 hindsight genius
The spread is designed, mostly, to balance betting. They were not right on this game.Vegas only gets it right often enough to build Billion dollar Casino-Hotels and fly gamblers into town on jets and comp them with suites, limos and all the food and beverages they want.
So I guess Vegas doesn’t know what they’re doing
Yeah, you were wrong.I’m getting a bad feeling about this game, especially with the weather.
Especially since the initial spread was about 8.5 and it’s now about 7.5-7.0
Indiana has tremendous motivation on their side.
Time will tell
Again.I’m getting a bad feeling about this game, especially with the weather.
Especially since the initial spread was about 8.5 and it’s now about 7.5-7.0
Indiana has tremendous motivation on their side.
Time will tell
That’s not true, the spread and the over/under are indicators of what Vegas thinks the final score will be.The spread is designed, mostly, to balance betting. They were not right on this game.
Another 20-20 hindsight geniusYeah, you were wrong.
If you’re telling me that you didn’t have a bad feeling when it looked like Indiana was about to score, then you’re a liarYeah, you were wrong.
Exactly. To balance the betting.That’s not true, the spread and the over/under are indicators of what Vegas thinks the final score will be.
Both move with the incoming flow of money
Irish looked pretty motivated on Friday night!No it doesn’t.
Doesn’t the cumulative effect of having more reasons to be motivated result in you being more motivated
For starters, Indiana has been a Notre Dame’s shadow for decades, ergo that’s additional motivation for Indiana to beat ND.
Being an underdog, inherently creates more motivation
While I would love to see a blowout, I’m concerned about this game
ND was the better team …… by farIrish looked pretty motivated on Friday night!
So just like I originally said lol glad you agree!ND was the better team …… by far
As to the degree of motivation by IU and ND, that will remain a mystery
What secret weapon ?Hey Pat, how did that secret weapon TB work out?
Yeah, you were wrong.I’m getting a bad feeling about this game, especially with the weather.
Especially since the initial spread was about 8.5 and it’s now about 7.5-7.0
Indiana has tremendous motivation on their side.
Time will tell
Only a total moron and a liar wouldn’t have gotten a bad feeling when it looked like Indiana was going to score early in the game.Yeah, you were wrong.
The game was never close. Except the opening kickoff.Only a total moron and a liar wouldn’t have gotten a bad feeling when it looked like Indiana was going to score early in the game.
Never close ?The game was never close. Except the opening kickoff.
That's a disingenuous comment. Indiana got an interception and was driving for a TD early in the 1st Quarter, and Watts got an interception at the 2 yard line to prevent a score.The game was never close. Except the opening kickoff.
As I stated, except for the opening kickoff, the game was never close.That's a disingenuous comment. Indiana got an interception and was driving for a TD early in the 1st Quarter, and Watts got an interception at the 2 yard line to prevent a score.
You are intellectually dishonest !As I stated, except for the opening kickoff, the game was never close.
Pesky interceptions..
I watched the game. Indiana was never a threat to win, ….again, never a threat to win, and Notre Dame thoroughly outplayed Indiana.You are intellectually dishonest !
Again, you're wrong. it was several minutes into the game, not just the kickoff. Each team had two offensive possessions prior to ND scoring its first TD.As I stated, except for the opening kickoff, the game was never close.
Pesky interceptions..
The game was never close, Indiana was never a threat to win, Notre Dame thoroughly outplayed Indiana.Again, you're wrong. it was several minutes into the game, not just the kickoff. Each team had two offensive possessions prior to ND scoring its first TD.
That's all true. But were you ever nervous during the game. I wasn't. Even if they got a TD there, we had more talent the better team and coaches and I was there and the environment was greatThat's a disingenuous comment. Indiana got an interception and was driving for a TD early in the 1st Quarter, and Watts got an interception at the 2 yard line to prevent a score.
No they didn't. We had 1 possession we threw an int. The next time we touched the ball Love went 98 yards. Then the next time we got out we had a 16 play drive.Again, you're wrong. it was several minutes into the game, not just the kickoff. Each team had two offensive possessions prior to ND scoring its first TD.
Actually it won't.ND was the better team …… by far
As to the degree of motivation by IU and ND, that will remain a mystery
Once ND scored yes, Indiana never threatened again, but you are wrong to say that ND had the game win at their place kickoff.The game was never close, Indiana was never a threat to win, Notre Dame thoroughly outplayed Indiana.
Give credit where credit is due.
No, I wasn't.That's all true. But were you ever nervous during the game. I wasn't. Even if they got a TD there, we had more talent the better team and coaches and I was there and the environment was great
We weren't losing that game and it didn't matter if they scored there or not
That was ND's second possession when they scored.No they didn't. We had 1 possession we threw an int. The next time we touched the ball Love went 98 yards. Then the next time we got out we had a 16 play drive.
After 3 drives it was 14 to 0 and the game was over
YeahThat was ND's second possession when they scored.
That doesn't matter, my point is the game was not over at the kickoff.Yeah
You stated that each team had 2 offensive possessions prior to ND scoring
ND scored on their 2nd and 3rd possession. Each team only had it once prior to our score
It wasn't. It was over after our 3rd possessionThat doesn't matter, my point is the game was not over at the kickoff.
The Indiana-Notre Dame wasn’t competitive. It was never competitive. At all.That doesn't matter, my point is the game was not over at the kickoff.
Read your initial post, you are changing the narrative.The Indiana-Notre Dame wasn’t competitive. It was never competitive. At all.
Hell, Notre Dame scored on their second and third possessions and never looked back.
Why you continue to argue that is odd.
The game was never close. Except the opening kickoff.
Read your initial comment.The Indiana-Notre Dame wasn’t competitive. It was never competitive. At all.
Hell, Notre Dame scored on their second and third possessions and never looked back.
Why you continue to argue that is odd.