This seems really ignorant when betting sites basically mirror the systems rankings when they make opening betting lines. F+ has Texas at about a three-point favorite over Washington on a neutral field, and the betting lines opened up with Texas being about a 3.5 to 4 point favorite.. again and again, and again, the betting lines mirror what F+ shows.Because we look at some of their rankings and just laugh and laugh and laugh.
It's the worst ranking system I've personally seen
I think a fundamental misunderstanding about granular systems such as this one is that whatever output that’s out there is predictive about what would happen given multiple multiple simulations, but that does not mean that will always be true of a one game scenario.
Again, I don’t want to believe the point, but I’m not sure what industry any of the posters here seem to work in, but granular data systems are used to inform just about every decision and this system is the only one that’s available for free.