Maybe ? NO !
Tell us how studying film improves the QB’s PHYSICAL ability to throw the football more accurately.
Buchner
- Thread starter Golson5
- Start date
Tell us how studying film improves the QB’s PHYSICAL ability to throw the football more accurately.
Philip Rivers terrible throwing mechanics
Yr 1 53.7
Last yr 72 pct
What else ya got? Any other excuse?
But he was more accurate !
And the more film he studied over the next few years didn’t improve his accuracy.
But again, tell us how studying film improves a QB’s PHYSICAL ability to throw the football more accurately?
You know nothing about physically throwing a football and you know nothing about football.
You‘re a dolt !
Last edited:
That would explain why you never played football !
Throwing a football is a physical activity
You're a clown in your own circus.
The xbox circus.
What you point to is the difference between experience and timing in a scheme.
Buchner isn't accurate.
Will his numbers improve? Yes.
Even yours would improve between study halls and art class if you had more time in a system along with other teammates.
But...
Those things aren't making him more accurate.
More efficient? Sure.
Not accurate.
You will never understand this so don't try.
Accuracy is the # 1 quality that QB’s need in the NFL, so tell us how every QB can improve their accuracy just by studying film.
You’re a FRAUD and a arrogant blowhard, which is probably the worst possible combination !
You’re a FRAUD and a arrogant blowhard, which is probably the worst possible combination !
You’re wasting your time, Golson5 doesn’t have a clue when it comes to understanding what’s involved in throwing a football accurately.
Good lord man...
You just don't get any of it.
I suspect you've never played and or coached football. My guess is any sport.
Being an expert on Xbox doesn't mean shit in real life.
Footwork, experience and film can all help becoming more efficient. Polished.
Being accurate is not done with nifty footwork or film or experience.
If it were such an easy given like you suggest then everyone would be playing QB...right?
Everyone can throw lazers with pin point accuracy with some film study and footwork...
Right?
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Let's just stick with Notre Dame here.
I don't follow your favorite team of Alabama like you do so we'll stick with ND....
Was Brandon Wimbush an accurate passer?
Yes or no.
Experience...
He had 16 starts...
Didn't help
Footwork?
Hhhmmm...🤔🤔🤔
Yeah maybe that's why he wasn't accurate. All the coaching experience at ND of all places would never think to work on a QB's footwork
Film?
So apparently he didn't watch film. Again at ND they never forced him to watch film or even thought to have him watch film. Of all things a terrible oversight on the coaches at Notre Dame. If only they got him watching film he'd be leading an NFL team right now to another Superbowl.
You're accurate or not. You can polish things but you're accurate or not.
Buchner is not accurate and he won't find any.
Can he be more efficient? Sure.
He won't become accurate
Now that’s one in a million
I was crazy high on Buchner before he changed his throwing mechanics
Lets stick with Notre Dame Bozo the Clown
Brady Quinn
1st year 47 pct
2nd year 54 pct
4th year 61 pct
Accuracy can be improved dumbass
I know you never played a down in your life let alone coach. Who the hell could you coach, girls flag football maybe
Yet again you avoid the question...because you're busy in your own circus...
Was Brandon Wimbush an accurate passer?
Yes or no?
Again...
What you cite is being more efficient. Experience in a system and with other players and their experience.
People with real football experience unlike those with video game experience like yourself can spot things a mile away. We don't need to look at a stat line to determine if a passer is accurate or not.
Buchner this year finished with
36 carries for 123 yards
Thats a 3.4 ypc average
Ian Book in 2017 had 38 carries for 206 yards
5.4 ypc average
So that means Book was much quicker than Buchner...right?
Is that right?
Back to the question you keep avoiding
Was Brandon Wimbush an accurate passer?
Yes or no?
Book may be faster than Buchner. He ran a 4.59 40. It would be a close race. You're acting like there is a big difference. Obviously you have no clue what you are talking about
No. Figure something smart to say BoZo. I know that's hard for you
Good lord...
The xbox statistician shows up again.
I didn't say one god damn thing about a 40 time, did I?
Buchner at the starting point to 8-10 yards is much..MUCH quicker than Book.
Again...
YOU KEEP AVOIDING THE QUESTION...
Was Brandon Wimbush an accurate passer or not?
Yes or no.
Now put down the god damn controller, the civics book, or the pen you're using writing a note to pass to another student during first period
Was Brandon Wimbush an accurate passer?
Yes or no
No hes not much quicker than Book. Inaccurate. Book was similar in quickness as well BoZo
I already said no. Learn to read clown
Watching McCarthy the other day, I see similarities between him and Buchner. And their stats were similar this weekend, right down to both of them throwing two pick 6s. McCarthy's a more polished passer at this point, but I think Buchner could be as good if he keeps improving.
I don’t think McCarthy can run like Buchner. TB is damn near an elite runner.
McCarthy is capable.
Tip at the line is not really his issue. The 100 yard pic, yea. He also had several amazing throws, some side arm underneath. He has some talent.
Tip absolutely was when you throw a short pass over middle side arm … even Rivers changes his motion for short throw over middle and screens, since everyone brings up rivers and Buchner having similar throwing motions
I don’t disagree.
But during the game he was being vilified and strangely, after the game, he’s being deified !
Philip rivers yr 1 53.7% yr 2 65.2%
Buchner year 1 60% yr 2 55.4%
So yeah, I got that
Rivers was slinging it successfully from the moment he stepped on campus, buchner is struggling still after 2 years. Only comparison is their motion. It's a crappy motion. Rivers made it work, buchner has not.
The gap between mccarthy and buchner throwing is much larger than their gap running.
53.7 is not slinging it. 2.5 games is too small a sample size for Buchner. We'll see where hes at next year. My guess is 60 to 63 if hes the starter
The questions we will never know are how the season would have played out if Buchner were the QB all season? Would we have lost to Stanford? Would be have beaten Clemson and USC? Would he have improved a lot over the course of the season? We will never know.
We may never know. Hartman is going to pick ND this week. The chances that he does not start >95% of the season next year is probably <5%. While Buchner will challenge him, Hartman will be the overwhelming favorite to win the job. He's far too experienced and high profile not to start. It's just the way it is. Without a good degree of good faith from the staff towards him that he is going to start, he would not be picking ND. Unless the offense just doesn't look good early in the season, Hartman never gets pulled. I expect Hartman will look good, probably as good as Book. Book's #'s were better than Buchner. Therefore, I doubt Buchner plays much barring a meltdown from Hartman.
The staff learned a valuable lesson this season. You can never be too rich at the most important position and sometimes you have to cut your losses, even if that loss is painful. That's the sign of an elite program (i.e., Ohio State). Imagine letting Joe Burrow transfer. It is what it is. Comes with the territory. Bring in the best and try and win a title at all costs.
We may never know. Hartman is going to pick ND this week. The chances that he does not start >95% of the season next year is probably <5%. While Buchner will challenge him, Hartman will be the overwhelming favorite to win the job. He's far too experienced and high profile not to start. It's just the way it is. Without a good degree of good faith from the staff towards him that he is going to start, he would not be picking ND. Unless the offense just doesn't look good early in the season, Hartman never gets pulled. I expect Hartman will look good, probably as good as Book. Book's #'s were better than Buchner. Therefore, I doubt Buchner plays much barring a meltdown from Hartman.
The staff learned a valuable lesson this season. You can never be too rich at the most important position and sometimes you have to cut your losses, even if that loss is painful. That's the sign of an elite program (i.e., Ohio State). Imagine letting Joe Burrow transfer. It is what it is. Comes with the territory. Bring in the best and try and win a title at all costs.
Last edited:
agree, but people thinking buchner is a good passer right now need to have their eyes checked. Yeah he makes some good throws under duress, but he misses more easy ones and makes terrible reads too often
