ADVERTISEMENT

Being a lifelong Notre Dame Fan but going to another College

I am currently a sophomore in High School and have been a diehard ND Football fan since I was 6 or 7, my dream is to one day be like Mike Tirico and do play by play for NBC and Notre Dame, I've been spending time looking at schools (mostly for sports broadcasting/sports analytics) Notre Dame dose not have much/anything for that, schools like Syracuse, Northwestern and Ohio State stand out to me. I assume I'm the youngest member on the site, so I ask this question. Will ND continue to be special and your main team after college, factoring in going to small and big school's (I am looking for Big). I'm aware everyone's journey is different but I can't see myself with another team and leaving something as special as ND football.

Comparing Lou Holtz and Brian Kelly

Just kicking back on a Saturday night. Watching college football ( of course). Started thinking about a Holtz and Kelly comparison. It’s not exactly an Apples to Apples comparison. ND is light years ahead of where it was back then. The investment in facilities, competitive compensation for assistant coaches, early enrollment, and leveraging the transfer portal. This holds true for any power 5 football program. However if you look at the numbers it becomes an interesting comparison. Categories such as # of seasons coached, total wins, winning percentage, # of 10 win seasons winning streaks, NC’s, wins vs top ten opponents. The obvious item missing from BK’s resume at this point is a National Championship. If ND wins a National Championship in 2020. How does BK stack up against my profile screen name.

IMO Lou Holtz is among the top 5 college coaches of all time. ND desperately needed his leadership after Gerry Faust. Brian Kelly has guided and transitioned ND’s program into the CFB’s modern day landscape. I look forward to the responses from our fellow posters. Ideally Lou Symmogi can weigh in on this topic.

I would still place Holtz ahead of BK. Even if ND wins the an NC this year. However it’s a much closer comparison then it was say 2 years ago. Kelly has excelled in handling the pressure and wear and tear of the job. Whereas the tread had worn thin on the Holtz regime.

Lou S. can you chime in?

I was watching ESPN's 150 years of College Football Notre Dame segment.
It's a great watch if you havens seen it.
It mentions how my dad was handicapped by Fr. Ted when he reduced scholarships in an attempt to de-emphasize football and push the image of ND as a scholastic giant.
This view was spoken by Ivan Maisel ( who i really like and respect) and a couple of others.

It then went on to Ara who rescued ND football after the drop off for 10 years.
The part that i didn't expect was when Ivan and others mentioned one of the main reasons for Ara to call it quits was again the Admins desire ( Fr. Ted and others) to put restraints on the football program.

Then when Lou Holtz took over it was again the Admin that basically ran him out.
My take is that i knew what happened with my dad and Holtz but i didn't realize it was that way with Ara as well.

I can only imagine what could be if a ND administrator fully embraced the glory and joy that a winning ( and i mean NC's) on a regular basis would bring.

ND vs. Clemson II - let's get it on!!!

All I hear is how Notre Dame is going to lose and still make the playoffs, as if the outcome is somehow already decided. They could be right, but last I checked, the game was played on the field, not on the main board at rivals, so yea. You look at Clemson and this year fits their MO - they have some near misses during the season playing a few patsies and half the time it's a question of keeping them motivated through all the blowout wins with all the talent they have on that team. They ebb and flow and are vulnerable at times through the season. Later on, when the playoffs come, they're capable of taking it to a whole nother level and can even blow out other elite teams like Alabama and OSU. Did ND catch them in the doldrums during the regular season on the road with Lawrence out and half the defense injured? To be fair, yea we probably did. I think part of it was that Ian Book when from a guy that looked indecisive and couldn't complete short screen passes and whether he wanted to scramble or stay in the pocket, to a guy that literally conjured up echos of Johnny Manzel with his improvisational skills and had Clemson on their heels for a good portion of the night. I mean seriously, Skalski was out and Book repeatedly made Venables kid (the linebacker, not the DC) look ridiculous on several plays. I don't think they had fully accounted for that heading into the previous matchup. Will they make the proper adjustments to account for this the second time around and will having Skalski and Lawrence back swing things back in Clemson's favor?

Maybe, probably. Everyone seems to think so.

Last I checked, however, these games come down to fundamentals - blocking, tackling, controlling the line of scrimmage, the run game, limiting penalties, and getting pressure on the quarterback, etc. These are the areas that Notre Dame excels at. I don't know what got into this team but guys like Tremble and Kiren Williams have been lights out on blocking and the whole line is grading out as tops in the nation. That gives us a fighting chance. Maybe Lou can tell us how many holding and false start penalties the irish have had all season, but I suspect you could probably count them all on the fingers you have attached to your hands. That's phenomenal. The Irish won the line in the first game with Clemson on both sides of the ball and there's no reason to expect that they can't do it again if they play hard nose and physical like they did before. All these things give us hope it will play out just like it did before.

Does Lawrence make that much of a difference? Ungalailai played lights out and the national analysts want to make it sound that it doesn't matter much, but to be fair I think it does matter, a lot in fact. He had a lot of yards and completions, but what matters more in these games are things like converting third downs, limiting mistakes, red zone efficiency, the leadership you provide in the huddle, etc. and Lawrence is, let's face it, a once in a generation quarterback. Who knows what his script is, but if he loses to ND on December 19th, that would be it for Clemson's 2020 season and for his college career overall. I don't see him sailing off quietly into the night without throwing haymakers at the Irish defense. Have teams gotten much pressure on him overall? Ever? If the Irish have a fighting chance they've got to disrupt him in the backfield like they did DJ Ungelailai before. I seem to recall Lawrence likes to stay in the pocket, but he's pretty athletic as well when he takes off, so we'll see.

Last time, the Irish shut down Etienne and took their chances with the passing game. The problem this time is that Lawrence and Etienne feed off one another and elevate eachother's game to lofty levels when they play together. They're like Gretzy and Curry playing together for the Oilers way back when. I don't think that was the case when Ungelailai was in there. Will it matter? Again, the Irish's best shot is still probably sticking with the same game plan and employ the same bend but don't break scheme that worked well last time.

How about intangibles? Clemson plays elite football at the end of every year and they look like they're in step with that this season. Can the Irish elevate their game accordingly not playing at home, and with dings on the offensive line? The way I look at it is this next game is basically the start of post-season play for the Irish though some argue that the game is inconsequential since we could lose and still get into the playoffs, I just don't think Brian Kelly and the Irish are looking at it that way. You beat Clemson again and all stigma of the 2012 blowout to the tide and the drubbing they took in the semifinals to the eventual NC tigers - you can toss all that out the window. The Irish would be a force to be reckoned with. And on top of it all this would be Brian Kelly's third shot in the playoffs (I count 2012 though, yes, that was before the current system was all set up), most of this team's upperclassmen have been there before so it's not so much deer in the headlights as it would be execute and control the tempo. Do the Irish have that next level that they can rise to in order to vanquish a team that let's face it, is certainly capable of winning it all? I don't really have an answer, but I will say that of all the teams since 1988, except maybe 1993, this is the squad that I have the most confidence in. They look like a team of destiny.

What would a win mean to this program? All these big wins are tough and mean a lot, but as we saw in 2012 when the Irish rose up and beat Oklahoma on the road, what lasting good did it do? They feel good and you remember them, but in my humble opinion to really move the needle you need at least two like that in the same season. Then you go from it was a fluke to it being a testimony that the program is on elite footing - and that's what Notre Dame needs. It would take all those previous shots from Joey Getherall and Reese Davis and jam them so far up their asses that they'd be burping up echos of our fightsong for weeks. Two elite wins earn you street cred in the playoffs that solidify the mindset against an alabama or OSU. It cements your footing with elite recruits that are considering Notre Dame. Two elite wins in the same season - you can't overstate how amazing that would be for this program.

Anyways, I know this is a shitty ending to a long rambling stream of consciousness, but I'm really interested in hearing all your thoughts for this upcoming game. The last one was the game of the year in college football and the ratings for this one are going to be through the roof. I fully admit I don't have a firm grasp on how it will go and I'm hopeful we do well, but we'll see.

Thanks for reading and stay safe during the pandemic!

Special teams coaching

Polian needs to remind Tyree that despite his elite speed, it is no bueno to try fielding the ball in the coffin corner on kickoffs. Easy way to get trapped way short of the 25. Best case scenario the ball bounces out and you get it at the 35. Smarter yet...catch it after already establishing yourself as out of bounds. Take it at the 35 as well but risky if you don't get the footwork right or misplay the ball. Easiest thing to do is just let it go. Worst case scenario is to get the ball at the 25.

A Thought And Then On To More Important Stuff

Having watched my fair share of ND games, the last thing that came to mind was this was a game that until recently ND would have lost, or it would have come down to the last possession. Syracuse came in well prepared, and were obviously not just going through the motions. One thing they tried to do was to take away the outside zone play, and in my opinion, they pretty much accomplished it. Not a lot of blitzing through the "A" gaps, but instead a lot of pressure coming from the outside. What was different about this ND team was it had a little more in it's arsenal offensively. Last year, teams wanted ND to bounce the ball outside because they just weren't very good at it, and as a result shut down any type of rushing game in between the tackles. This year, and yesterday in particular, is another story. If a team is going to try and take something away, ND has an answer for it, and that's the reason the score ended up like it did.

Hat's off to Book. he threw for 285 yards and 3 TD's while going 24-37, and had 53 rushing yards on 8 attempts, but it wasn't just about the stats, it was how he got there, and it leads into the more important stuff. I don't recall seeing a team that mixed up it's coverages, and blitzes more frequently than yesterday. It was anywhere from rushing 4 to rushing 7, and a tight man to a loose zone. It's easy to be an arm-chair QB (like I was) yesterday, but Book picked his spots, and took advantage of what the defense was giving him whether it was to a receiver finding a cushion inside the zone, or putting the ball up to one of his receivers when in single coverage. His ability to pick his spot and take off running to get a first down has been incredibly important to this teams success.

The really important stuff was Josh Lugg's game. I watched him this morning and came away with these thoughts. For starters, he looked very comfortable. Early in the game on a Skowronek catch, he passed off the DT to the OG and instead of staying with him he put himself in great position to pick up a LB on a delayed blitz. Last week, Zeke had some trouble with this. For the most part, I thought he did well in pass protection, and was able to handle the NT, and was assignment correct throughout the game. There were a couple of protections where the NT beat him through the gap, but I think that only one would have counted as a true pressure. In the run game Lugg looked a little different this week. He was getting out to the second level, and had some nice blocks, and he seemed to hold up well in not allowing penetration.

The big question coming up is who'll be at center in 2 weeks? As much as I like Zeke's potential, I think you need to stay with Lugg. He's a bigger body right now, and that's going to be needed against Clemson's DT's and whoever else they are playing in the first round of the playoffs. When Zeke played against North Carolina it was a pretty small front, and I question if he'll be able to hold up physically. The other, and most important thing is being assignment correct. I'm going to go with experience for the rest of the year, and I think Lugg brings that. Getting Lugg, Kraemer and Banks on the same page against Clemson will be crucial because they aren't going to stand back on defense, they're going to come at you from all different angles. Of course I could be wrong on all this, but we'll see.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT