Football Notre Dame football injury report: DT Rylie Mills out for rest of CFP
- By cmck
- The Insider Lounge
- 38 Replies
This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.
He is an all-time great great QB in ND's history. Full stop. Period. Deal with it.Yes he did. He was a very good college QB. Calling him an all time great in the illustrious history of ND football is an insult to those players that were actually all time greats who earned the recognition and awards that come with such a distinction.
Dumb.Great job by our strength and conditioning coach
He should be fired yesterday!Great job by our strength and conditioning coach
He had nothing to do with this one. And Onye is out because of personal reasons not injuryGreat job by our strength and conditioning coach
Yes he did. He was a very good college QB. Calling him an all time great in the illustrious history of ND football is an insult to those players that were actually all time greats who earned the recognition and awards that come with such a distinction.He led ND to two playoff appearance, I'm pretty sure he's almost or is the top statistical leader in every QB category in ND history, and it's just impossible to discredit or blow him off as you're doing with anything even approaching a shred of intellectual or argumentative credibility, it's just invidious gibberish. And of course in his case he's intimately associated with BK, which can be a death sentence for a former ND player, certainly a QB. That's the one position that's essentially an extension of the HC, and it will forever sully Book's legacy in ND lore. That's how perverse ND's fanbase has become.
RL is way more than a " cog". If you understood the responsibilities and decision making in "zone read" plays ( the staple of the offense) and RPO's you'd know the QB in such an offense is not a " cog" but the pilot so to speak. He's making the decisions that lead to a effective and productive offense.Book was probably a better athlete than RL. I think he ran like a 4.6 flat at the combine or pro day or whatever. So RL doesn't even have him on that. But I don't know, maybe he runs a 4.55. I suppose he's more of a 'natural' runner, maybe, meaning something like, he's happy to take off and run, is a pretty good all around athlete, and has sort of a knack for it. And the fact that he is not a great passer encourages this tendency as a practical matter. He's a dual threat! If a coach wanted to run Book as much as RL is utilized in that way he'd probably do just as well. And he is smaller, RL is like a TE almost. Plus I think RL is deceptively fast, and really does catch defenders off guard.
It's not an apples to apples comparison in any case. Book was a three year starter and all time ND great, and RL is a one year rent a QB in the portal era. And RL hardly carries the team, he's almost more like a cog in this offense. The defense leads the way, and the run game, of which he most certainly is a key part, leads the offense. We pass as effectively as we do, on account of the strength and threat of the run game, and as a complement to it. And as long as we stay within RL's limits as a passer, which Denbrock has seemed to orchestrate brilliantly, our passing game is very functional.
He led ND to two playoff appearance, I'm pretty sure he's almost or is the top statistical leader in every QB category in ND history, and it's just impossible to discredit or blow him off as you're doing with anything even approaching a shred of intellectual or argumentative credibility, it's just invidious gibberish. And of course in his case he's intimately associated with BK, which can be a death sentence for a former ND player, certainly a QB. That's the one position that's essentially an extension of the HC, and it will forever sully Book's legacy in ND lore. That's how perverse ND's fanbase has become.All time great ? That's embarrassing. A very good college QB. No more, no less. ND has had lots of those.
It was clearly an attempt at gotcha, but not a dumb question. And easily answered while also providing your context, but you chose not to. That was my point. We all know there are many variables to each game. Hell, the fact we played in New York and then Los Angeles, and the impact this had is rarely discussed, etc…. USC was clearly the more difficult game for us, but IU was the better team imo. Enough said.Exactly. And I knew ND would play Indiana better because of all those points I made
It was a dumb question and he tried to get a gotcha. I wasn't going to play that silly game but you wanted an answer to a dumb question for some reason
If SC came into our stadium in the exact scenario like Indiana we curbstomp them. They are the better team and its by a good margin