I was pulling for you guys. But just can't miss three foul shots at the end of the game, and have your last two possession result in 0 points. You should have won.
exactly. if you would have asked every one here to predict the score knowing nd's three best players would shoot 8 for 31 I doubt anyone would have predicted nd to be within 10 points of Kentucky.Originally posted by MirageSmack:
You can't make every foul shot, they shot a decent percentage overall. And they scored on like 8 or 9 straight possessions before the last two, also impressive. The thing is, UK made every single shot after the 12:16 point of the game.
I listed several games earlier stating where they played better. There are lots of factors that play into statistical anomalies such as you mentioned. Stats only tell part of the story.Originally posted by cgvr:
Well you shot 53.2 percent from the field vs a .468 season average.
You shot 50% from 3 pt range versus a .347 season average.
We shot 46% and 28% vs 50% and 39% for the season.
Connaughton 3-10, Jackson 1-7 and Grant 4-14 were a combined 8-31.
A lot of that is good defense, but we were off.
Wasn't Kentucky's last miss from the field at the 12:14 mark?
Can you show me another stretch like that in a similar circumstance?
I've followed you guys pretty darn closely and it was easily the best you've played that I have seen ....
What game(s) have you played better?
PS Thanks for the kind remark on opponent....
PPS Calipari stated, "...ND had a great year and easily could be National Champions...." on ESPN,
I think there are only 3 teams that can fit that bill Kentucky, Notre Dame and Wisconsin....
That's part of my rationale....
Well, I agree that ND played their heart out and forced UK to find different ways to win. Like I said earlier, I think ND beats any team in the field that night with their performance, other than UK.Originally posted by cgvr:
No worries.
I've seen Kentucky play "Bruise ball" with Louisville and run like gazelles in other games.
Statistically you were extremely strong in a "do or die" situation.
This was the Elite 8 crucible and you finished the game making without missing for over 10 minutes.
You needed each of those 9 shots (2 3's?) to win.
The tough stretches you noted were due in large part to outstanding ND play.
That's not bad basketball being played. It's extraordinary effort/will being displayed.
We forced you to elevate your game and the "probing" you did led to taking advantage of Towns.
It may have been different had an offensive foul been called on Towns when he dropped his shoulder into Auguste earlier in the game.
Instead, Auguste was forced to back off a bit....
It was a great game and it took Kentucky's best shot.
You may disagree with that....
I know how much you hate logic. can't ignore facts no matter how obvious they are.Originally posted by TurnoverMachine:
Captain obvious is back to let us know hey no big deal, coming up short in every big game is okay.