ADVERTISEMENT

The SEC Couldnt Handle The Grind of a ND Season

Boy that is some sour So Cal grapes right there

You trumpeted NIU beating ND at least 25 times in last 3 weeks but you pull a chassball on this game
Anyone who brags about the 2024 Notre Dame schedule, or tells us how great this ND football team is, simply be reminded that when you can’t beat
crappy Northern Illinois in South Bend, you shouldn’t have a whole lot to say.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rrdd2021
Anyone who brags out the 2024 Notre Dame schedule, or tells us how great this football team is, simply be reminded that when you can’t beat .
crappy Northern Illinois in South Bend, you shouldn’t have a whole lot to say.
Watch me. Who are you to tell people what to say or not to say. Shut your mouth you fool
 
I was told by the experts that ND win vs A&M wasnt really that impressive yet some how Missouri becomes the 4th straight top 10 SEC team to lose at A&M. Its time to admit the truth that the SEC couldnt handle the grind of a ND season.
A “…grind…”
 
I was told by the experts that ND win vs A&M wasnt really that impressive yet some how Missouri becomes the 4th straight top 10 SEC team to lose at A&M. Its time to admit the truth that the SEC couldnt handle the grind of a ND season.
Miami-Ohio to Louisville to Stanford, all at home. and I am being told this schedule is a “…grind…”

LMFAO:
 
Anyone who brags about the 2024 Notre Dame schedule, or tells us how great this ND football team is, simply be reminded that when you can’t beat
crappy Northern Illinois in South Bend, you shouldn’t have a whole lot to say.
Says the guy that tried to tell me last year that Chip Kelly, in his 6th year at UCLA was doing a great job at .500 ball

Get a grip. AM was a tier 1 win
 
Says the guy that tried to tell me last year that Chip Kelly, in his 6th year at UCLA was doing a great job at .500 ball

Get a grip. AM was a tier 1 win

And losing to Northern Illinois in South Bend was a tier 12 loss.

So what.
 
And losing to Northern Illinois in South Bend was a tier 12 loss.

So what.
Yes. It was. Just like losing to Tulsa, losing to a 4-8 Duke team with only one conf win, and losing to a 4-8 NW team …all at home.

Add to that, losing twice to a Navy team with 5 losses…
 
I dont care what their SOS is right now, im going based on their raw production adjusted for opponent quality and for luck.

ND would be an underdog against Ole Miss, Tennessee, Georgia, and Alabama on a neutral field as of 10-5-2024.

SOS is a limited way of judging quality of schedule as it evaluates teams based purely on win-loss record and the win-loss record of their opponents. And as we all know by now (based on the book i've written on the topic on this forum) that there are far better ways to evaluate the quality of teams than merely their win loss record.

And Kentucky isn't ranked in the AP poll, but are ranked 21st in F+ through week 5. Furthermore, Kentucky has a 1 point loss to Georgia (top 5 team) and a 3 point win vs Ole Miss (a top 10 team) through the first 5 weeks of the season. Their other loss (South Carolina) is a team in the top 30.

Kentucky has already played a greater schedule in just 5 weeks than ND will play through all 12 games of their season.
How is the 0 points in the 1st half against a 2 loss team going to affect their raw prodction?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BGI User 756
This didn't age well....


When did we start evaluating programs and quality of teams based on the outcome of a single game?

Even if Alabama and Georgia lost 100-0 to NIU today I would still put all my money on Alabama and Georgia the following week to run over Notre Dame

These teams aren't even playing in the same level of college football.
 
When did we start evaluating programs and quality of teams based on the outcome of a single game?

Even if Alabama and Georgia lost 100-0 to NIU today I would still put all my money on Alabama and Georgia the following week to run over Notre Dame

These teams aren't even playing in the same level of college football.
You were running your mouth about how great they are compared to us and how weak our schedule is

Yet the facts say these teams have played weaker schedules than us (Tenn, Ole Miss) and Bama lost to Vandy and gave up 40 points. Vandy is playing at a diff level of cfb than Bama.

Wasn't a good day for you today.

How did Missouri look against TX Am who we beat by 10?

Rough rough day
 
  • Like
Reactions: BGI User 756
Texas A and M can win the conference
And Army can get into the playoffs and win a national title

And while we're at it, Riley Leonard could turn into a Heisman trophy winner

And let's give Beaux Collins the Biletnikoff award 😂
You were running your mouth about how great they are compared to us and how weak our schedule is

Yet the facts say these teams have played weaker schedules than us (Tenn, Ole Miss) and Bama lost to Vandy and gave up 40 points. Vandy is playing at a diff level of cfb than Bama.

Wasn't a good day for you today.

How did Missouri look against TX Am who we beat by 10?

Rough rough day
A rough day for me what are you talking about?

Some of the best teams in the country got upset today it happens. This doesn't change anything going forward for the Notre Dame football program or the top tier teams in college football they are all susceptible to random one-off losses you don't throw out years of evaluations and data on these programs because of a single possession loss in a single game one weekend you are doing it wrong
 
And Army can get into the playoffs and win a national title

And while we're at it, Riley Leonard could turn into a Heisman trophy winner

And let's give Beaux Collins the Biletnikoff award 😂

A rough day for me what are you talking about?

Some of the best teams in the country got upset today it happens. This doesn't change anything going forward for the Notre Dame football program or the top tier teams in college football they are all susceptible to random one-off losses you don't throw out years of evaluations and data on these programs because of a single possession loss in a single game one weekend you are doing it wrong
Of course it does. Our year now is much better than Tennessees. Same record but our sos is much better.

You told me how they were well above us.

Rough rough day for your narratives 🤣🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: BGI User 756
When did we start evaluating programs and quality of teams based on the outcome of a single game?

Even if Alabama and Georgia lost 100-0 to NIU today I would still put all my money on Alabama and Georgia the following week to run over Notre Dame

These teams aren't even playing in the same level of college football.
You were running your mouth about how great they are compared to us and how weak our schedule is

Yet the facts say these teams have played weaker schedules than us (Tenn, Ole Miss) and Bama lost to Vandy and gave up 40 points. Vandy is playing at a diff level of cfb than Bama.

Wasn't a good day for you today.

How did Missouri look against TX Am who we beat by 10?

Rough rough day
And Army can get into the playoffs and win a national title

And while we're at it, Riley Leonard could turn into a Heisman trophy winner

And let's give Beaux Collins the Biletnikoff award 😂

A rough day for me what are you talking about?

Some of the best teams in the country got upset today it happens. This doesn't change anything going forward for the Notre Dame football program or the top tier teams in college football they are all susceptible to random one-off losses you don't throw out years of evaluations and data on these programs because of a single possession loss in a single game one weekend you are doing it wrong
Of course it does. Our year now is much better than Tennessees. Same record but our sos is much better.

You told me how they were well above us.

Rough rough day for your narratives 🤣🤣
Same shit. Different day.
 
Sports are great because you have to play the games to know who's the best. Across an entire season. Playoffs too.

So today we of course saw some upsets. But how does that contextualize ND? I am not sure.

I however would not bet on ND over AL, MI, or GA. I still think the Irish have fundamental issues: Denbrock, the OL, RL, and Freeman. My eye test says the aforementioned teams are better.

But we will see the rest of the way. So many what ifs. Can ND run the table and make the playoffs if top teams have > 1 loss? Or do the Irish lose more and we gnash our teeth?

Same for questions on SOS. Other than TAMU, I don't think the Irish have played very good teams.

Too many variables.
 
Of course it does. Our year now is much better than Tennessees. Same record but our sos is much better.

You told me how they were well above us.

Rough rough day for your narratives 🤣🤣
So Notre Dame is a better football program today because Tennessee lost to Arkansas and Alabama lost to Vandy?
 
Sports are great because you have to play the games to know who's the best. Across an entire season. Playoffs too.

So today we of course saw some upsets. But how does that contextualize ND? I am not sure.

I however would not bet on ND over AL, MI, or GA. I still think the Irish have fundamental issues: Denbrock, the OL, RL, and Freeman. My eye test says the aforementioned teams are better.

But we will see the rest of the way. So many what ifs. Can ND run the table and make the playoffs if top teams have > 1 loss? Or do the Irish lose more and we gnash our teeth?

Same for questions on SOS. Other than TAMU, I don't think the Irish have played very good teams.

Too many variables.
That's why you use a system that incorporates a lot of data over a number of games to provide a hierarchy of who the best teams are in the country

Alabama and Tennessee are ranked in the top seven of college football so far in F+ based on their overall production/body of work this season

a one-off loss will lower their rating a little bit but it doesn't really change much That's why I don't understand the weird victory lapse people are taking today it makes no sense
 
So Notre Dame is a better football program today because Tennessee lost to Arkansas and Alabama lost to Vandy?
No. You told me today that Tennessee was on another level than ND (they arent)

So now they have the same record as ND but our sos is much better than theirs right now

But you will still say Tenn is on another level based on nothing but your opinion. Nothing on the field says so.

Notre Dame is not a better program than Bama. Only someone trying to defect would say that. But I think we can compete with Bama this year. They aren't so far above us like they have been in the past. Their defense is not the Bama defense of past

There are no unbeatable teams this season. Last year either. More parity last 2 years than there has been in a long long time
 
That's why you use a system that incorporates a lot of data over a number of games to provide a hierarchy of who the best teams are in the country

Alabama and Tennessee are ranked in the top seven of college football so far in F+ based on their overall production/body of work this season

a one-off loss will lower their rating a little bit but it doesn't really change much That's why I don't understand the weird victory lapse people are taking today it makes no sense
And they will both be dropped some after today because these games will count too and when you put the data in from today it will knock them down because they played like shit against average teams
 
That's why you use a system that incorporates a lot of data over a number of games to provide a hierarchy of who the best teams are in the country

Alabama and Tennessee are ranked in the top seven of college football so far in F+ based on their overall production/body of work this season

a one-off loss will lower their rating a little bit but it doesn't really change much That's why I don't understand the weird victory lapse people are taking today it makes no sense


If ND goes undefeated and those teams have>= 2 losses, it can get interesting.

Data only goes so far in a voting based ranking system. This is not an ELO style system, used in chess or soccer national team rankings. Interestingly enough, the highest ranked national soccer teams are not necessarily the winners of major tournaments...so even that is not perfectly correlated.
 
No. You told me today that Tennessee was on another level than ND (they arent)

So now they have the same record as ND but our sos is much better than theirs right now

But you will still say Tenn is on another level based on nothing but your opinion. Nothing on the field says so.

Notre Dame is not a better program than Bama. Only someone trying to defect would say that. But I think we can compete with Bama this year. They aren't so far above us like they have been in the past. Their defense is not the Bama defense of past

There are no unbeatable teams this season. Last year either. More parity last 2 years than there has been in a long long time

I never said Tennessee was at the level of Alabama or Georgia I just said that they would be favored in a game at a neutral site against Notre Dame and that would still be the case even after their loss to Arkansas today.

Again I don't get how some really good teams losing today in one off losses in one possession games against teams in their own conference changes anything at all nobody was saying that Alabama and Tennessee were going to go undefeated and demolish everybody by 50 points

Alabama would still be a huge favorite over Notre Dame

I would still pick Tennessee over Notre Dame if they were playing an hypothetical matchup this upcoming Saturday at a neutral site
And they will both be dropped some after today because these games will count too and when you put the data in from today it will knock them down because they played like shit against average teams
Yes their performance today was not on par with their typical performance so far this season and the data from today will be incorporated into the overall data on these teams and impact their rating but none of these losses are some program defining indictment on the quality of these teams going forward

If you are drastically changing your evaluations of teams based on a single one possession loss then you're not doing it right

Let me frame it another way

If Alabama and Tennessee were to win today by 30 points in their games I would still feel the same way about both of these teams very little changes in the overall outlook based on the performance of a single game

It's the same reason why F+ still has Notre Dame in the top 10 despite losing to the number 100 ranked NIU
 
Last edited:
I never said Tennessee was at the level of Alabama or Georgia I just said that they would be favored in a game at a neutral site against Notre Dame and that would still be the case even after their loss to Arkansas today.

Again I don't get how some really good teams losing today in one off losses in one possession games against teams in their own conference changes anything at all nobody was saying that Alabama and Tennessee were going to go undefeated and demolish everybody by 50 points

Alabama would still be a huge favorite over Notre Dame

I would still pick Tennessee over Notre Dame if they were playing an hypothetical matchup this upcoming Saturday at a neutral site

Yes their performance today was not on par with their typical performance so far this season and the data from today will be incorporated into the overall data on these teams and impact their rating but none of these losses are some program defining indictment on the quality of these teams going forward

If you are drastically changing your evaluations of teams based on a single one possession loss then you're not doing it right

Let me frame it another way

If Alabama and Tennessee were to win today by 30 points in their games I would still feel the same way about both of these teams very little changes in the overall outlook based on the performance of a single game

It's the same reason why F+ still has Notre Dame in the top 10 despite losing to the number 100 ranked NIU
In the real world, the games matter

The results today will have a huge impact of the CFP

I would have taken ND over Tenn before today and my opinion was only strengthened by how things went today.

Same with a Missouri USC and Michigan
 
All the teams losing is good for our Irish, as long as our Irish win out.

That said, there is a difference losing to a conference foe vs a non conference group of five team at home. The games have to be played on the field but I would think NIU is an underdog to Arkansas but Vandy, maybe, maybe not? Vandy likely has a better roster over all though. I’d bet Vandy on a neutral field.
 
And losing to Northern Illinois in South Bend was a tier 12 loss.

So what.
ND will be in the playoffs, and you'll be here so mad, but trying to sound smart and funny.

I can see it now. On the internet at 1am, looking for people to argue with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BGI User 756
Sports are great because you have to play the games to know who's the best. Across an entire season. Playoffs too.

So today we of course saw some upsets. But how does that contextualize ND? I am not sure.

I however would not bet on ND over AL, MI, or GA. I still think the Irish have fundamental issues: Denbrock, the OL, RL, and Freeman. My eye test says the aforementioned teams are better.

But we will see the rest of the way. So many what ifs. Can ND run the table and make the playoffs if top teams have > 1 loss? Or do the Irish lose more and we gnash our teeth?

Same for questions on SOS. Other than TAMU, I don't think the Irish have played very good teams.

Too many variables.
You think Mich is in same tier as Bama and UGA ?
 
When did we start evaluating programs and quality of teams based on the outcome of a single game?

Even if Alabama and Georgia lost 100-0 to NIU today I would still put all my money on Alabama and Georgia the following week to run over Notre Dame

These teams aren't even playing in the same level of college football.
The irony. From the guy who continues to “evaluate” Colorado based on the outcome of a single game
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT