On what proof do you base this statement on? If you are going to blather then you have to back it up with actual proof.Republicans aren't t pro life they are pro birth. Once s child is born they don t seem to give a damn about their welfare.
On what proof do you base this statement on? If you are going to blather then you have to back it up with actual proof.Republicans aren't t pro life they are pro birth. Once s child is born they don t seem to give a damn about their welfare.
Watch a recent video with Sister Joan Chittister. She explains much better than I or anyone else here could.On what proof do you base this statement on? If you are going to blather then you have to back it up with actual proof.
Watch a recent video with Sister Joan Chittister. She explains much better than I or anyone else here could.
Would an atheist voluntarily allow himself to be tortured then executed for his cause?
Christianity is based on historical fact but you refuse to see and believe. That will be your problem in the end. I will have enough of my own. It makes perfect sense in your world that people allowed themselves to be martyred for something false, especially the first generation martyrs who were actually there. I don't agree with anything you say on the subject but I will never walk out on you when you are making your comments. I'm good like that.
I did. You find the link.No, I want you to explain with actual facts. You brought it up now you back it up.
I don't understand the logic of your post. If you are saying that Jesus believed in God and your proof is that he allowed himself to be tortured and killed for his cause, I can understand that. The whole mythology surrounding Jesus' birth, death, and resurrection lack logic and common sense.
Duck,
I explained to you why Logic tells me that there is a Supreme Being who created the Universe. There
Are a few indisputable facts: The World, Universe, and life exist. The question is why and how ?
Even if there were no organized religions, The sense of everything that I see around me, tells me that
There is both a " Master Plan " and a "Master Planner" ! There is far too much order in the Universe to think that it just happened haphazardly ?
As far as the " Mythology " of The events in the life and death of Christ, He did live and was ,at the
Least, a historical person, not a myth. The New Testament is a historical account of the events in the Life of Christ.
Why would all the Apostles lie about the events that they describe as eye witnesses ? Why would they Give up everything they had to follow Jesus ? And why would they suffer persecution and give up their own lives for a Myth ?
Moreover, it was not only Mathew,Mark, Luke, and John, but also the many followers who where also witnesses to the events in the Life of Jesus who were willing to suffer persecution and death for not only their faith in Jesus, but also the events and miracles that they saw with their own eyes.
So in my humble opinion, I think that the life and resurrection of Jesus is based upon a history Written by eye witnesses to those events.
Of course, since none of us were eye witnesses, I accept the New Testament on Faith that the accounts are accurate. It is obvious that you do not ?
RGC, I respect your faith but I need more than a "sense" that there is a Master Plan and/or Master Planner. The New Testament is not, in fact, a historical account of the events of his life. It was written anywhere from 100 to 300 years after his death and was subsequently modified through the ages. The best historians of the age were primarily Roman and Greek historians. They reference Jesus but there is no mention of any miracles or that he was anything special in that age.
I recommend a great book called Zealot by Reza Aslan. He takes a very deep and academic at life back in Jesus' time and discusses the number of claimed messiahs that were roaming the desert seeking followers. It doesn't completely answer why so many have accepted Jesus as the "true" messiah but it really is a good read.
Duck ,
1. You asked me for logic, and I have given you examples of why my logic leads me to a Supreme Being. You have not given any logical reasons about how the world and life on it came into existence .
2. From my research on the Gospels , they were published from 40 AD to 70 AD.
While the best historians of the age were Greek and Roman historians, the Apostles and earlier Christians Knew and were close to Jesus, while the Greeks and Roman historians were not.
RGC, I have no proof that there is no supreme being, just as I have no proof that there aren't little green people running around on Mars or that there are or are not multiple universes. It is difficult, if not impossible, for science to disprove something. I have no idea how or why the universe came into existence. That is well past my level of intellectual competence.
As to logic, here is my problem. I have studied religion, and Christianity in particular, to be familiar with its inconsistencies and illogic. I don't like sharing that with true believers who I like and respect. There is no benefit to come of such discussions. You find comfort in your faith and I am happy for you for that. If I were successful in causing you to question your faith, that would not benefit either of us as I wish you no ill will. Let's just say that you are I are both comfortable with our beliefs and that we wish one another well.
Christianity is based on historical fact but you refuse to see and believe. That will be your problem in the end. I will have enough of my own. It makes perfect sense in your world that people allowed themselves to be martyred for something false, especially the first generation martyrs who were actually there. I don't agree with anything you say on the subject but I will never walk out on you when you are making your comments. I'm good like that.
Would an atheist voluntarily allow himself to be tortured then executed for his cause?