OT: This is exactly what I'm talking about
- Thread starter TOMMY_23
- Start date
LOL, at least you didn't cite Fox or Breitbart. Rather than link rightwing accounts circle jerking your view, why not explain why not former indictment has ensued?
shocking stuff!!!
[/QUOTE]
mobile,wnd.com, NY Post, Washington Times....3 strikes and you're out!!!!
shocking stuff!!!
mobile,wnd.com, NY Post, Washington Times....3 strikes and you're out!!!![/QUOTE]
That is our past President who ruled over our 57 states.
What the **** does this have to do with Notre Dame. If you want to post political sheet then go to a political forum NOT HERE!!!!!
That is our past President who ruled over our 57 states.
mobile,wnd.com, NY Post, Washington Times....3 strikes and you're out!!!!
[/QUOTE]Wow, great comebck
Sort of like talking about the attacks on 7/11. So, tell me, how understanding you'd be if Obama, like Trump, had said he could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody without losing a vote.
Because Paul Ryan is gutless, but that doesn't mean a crime didn't happen buy the definition you applied to the Trump administration
LOL, you always have a rationale for why your dead certain accusations never amount to anything but the hot air of your outrage.
So in your mind if a crime isn't prosecuted it's not a crime?
I'm not outraged just trying to figure out your logic
In my mind, you haven't advanced anything beyond a lot of prototypical right wing theories that a crime has been committed. Moreover, that nobody in a government comprised of people who despise him has brought any charges debunks the essence of those right wing theories.
However, why do you sidestep the email account of Donnie Jr., which indicated that a Russian government representative was going to be at a meeting to discuss Hillary? The email chain has Donnie Jr. gleeful about the news, as he suggested releasing it during a time in the campaign when optimum damage could be inflicted. Subsequent investigation indicates that Donnie Jr. lied about who attended the meeting and that Donnie Sr. lied about his involvement in crafting a responding statement. These aren't shrieking opinion pieces from zealots. These are "from the horse's mouth" sources.
Last edited:
1 The IRS/BATF/NLRB targeting Conservatives
2 President Obama's Admin over saw illegal sale of fire arm to Mexican trafficker
3 President Obama's Secretaries of State:
A) setting up private servers to evade ordinary Government over site. Routinely (along with associates) mislead investigators, and hide/destroyed evidence.
B) Using an alias to email her meeting with President Clinton, and asking the FBI director call investigation a "matter" hum Interference? I know you heard what the NY Times, and the Washington Post said about this?
4 The VA waiting list (enough said)
5) Obama Administration Spying on millions of Americans/ unmasking many.
6) President Obama's AG held in contempt of Congress for inhibiting the investigations of other Admin scandals (very telling).
If you would like more I can give them to you, but you know these things,
7) President Obama administration not prosecuting the NBPP (New Black Panther Party) for voter intimidation.
Do you need more?
I haven;'t commented on the Trump Jr story, because unlike you. I don't know everything, and am waiting on the outcome of the investigation, but this is pale in comparison to the above.
More blather. Why would I expect anything else
Yeah, I need validation from something other than flimsy right wing sources that all these things happened with the insidious design that you attribute. Given that this laundry list of accusations hasn't taken the form of a formal charge, there's ample reason to be dubious. In fact, just the way you word things invites doubt. You said she set up a private email account to avoid government oversight. That expressed intent is purely a biased guess on your part. A more plausible scenario is that she used an AOL account because that's what she was comfortable with. Mike Pence was determined to have done the same thing and that was his explanation. Again, I'm not speculating about possible activities that haven't mushroomed into a formal charge, I'm focusing on a line of proven activity related to a certified intelligence community finding that electoral interference was conducted by Russia in favor of Donald J. Trump.
Its an interesting change of events. From unproven collusion theories to bringing in a special prosecutor when no crime has been committed according to several investigative committee.
Anywho I
If you don't find it ironic that President Trump is under special prosecution over an assumption compared to the list of things I put in the previous post ........any one of them could have called for a special prosecutor including Eric Holders actions then there's nothing I can say to you
You're being dishonest, and that's a shame.
Yes, it's especially interesting given that the special counsel has been appointed by a Republican. That should make consider that there might be something to legitimately pursue.
Again, all you're doing in the other issues is seemingly complain, squawk, and kvetch that a charge hasn't been brought forth. I'm sure you have some "convincing" explanations along the lines of "Ryan is gutless" to account for this.
How funny that a guy who identifies himself as a poet misuses the word "irony" so often.
That's true. CA passes out driver's licenses like candy to illegals.
The ultimate irony occurred today with white supremacist a-holes carrying Confederate flags and chanting " you lost, get over it ".
Last edited:
Or a Taliban supporter standing on stage with Hillary at a campaign rally in Florida. The ultimate irony indeed.
Was anyone affected by today's violence, enough to rethink their rhetoric? Idiots on both sides squared off against each other, just looking for a fight. Well they got want they wanted. A nutjob drove a car into his opponents with clear malice, killing people, probably thinking it was justified. Then our President waffles on his condemnation. Even his wife drew a harder line. Sad, truly sad.
Stick to blaming the people involved, just like we were told to do when the far left destroyed everything in sight during their protests. One guy drove the car. One shooter was involved in Orlando.He was to blame. The cowards involved in the Boston marathon bombing were the ones who did it. They were to blame.Or the shooter in Dallas that killed Dallas' finest. He did it. The President condemned hate.Are you implying that Trump is responsible? Is there anything he could have said to please the anti-Trump? I'd rather have the guy focus on NoKo.
Like many of the republican leaders in this country who actually condemned the white nationalists and the flat out show of racism it would have been 'nice' to hear him say the same. It's really sad that he wouldn't. Won't risk alienating that group of voters.
Sure they do, but there are more neanderthal conservatives here and they're united in dementia.
Attitudes like yours are part of the problem in my opinion. Shouldn't t a president be able to do both ? 45 is the great divider.
The great divider? That's rich, considering the previous 8 years. Pales in comparison. More fake news.
Fake news ? Was the video from yesterday fake ? Were you there or was your robe and hood at the cleaners ?
Did you get on your pe
Did you lecture the world about the rioters in Ferguson, Baltimore, the riots and killings of the five officers in Dallas? Do you speak out on the hate oozing from Move on, George Soros, Black Panthers, those mask wearing cowards carrying clubs and destroying everything in sight, Southern Poverty Law center, BLM? Or, as usual, are you a selective social warrior? I understand why the past is sensitive to you. If it was up to you, there would be no History taught in education. Now , instead of blaming the violence from both sides yesterday, you blame my attitude as a source. Classic stupidity coming from someone who is supposed to be molding young minds. There is no chance you separate what you feel here from what you say in the classroom. Pity for the kids.
Who said anything about what happened yesterday being fake news? I was talking about the idiots that call trump the "great divider" because of what happened yesterday. So do me a favor, echo, and jam the robe and hood comment as far as possible. It's a bunch of bullshit, like most of your posts.
How intolerant of you islero! The neanderthal comment is a very hurtful stereotype that libs are supposedly against. Are you a bigot now too?
Not sure if those were discussed here.many of the topics you cited were discussed in the classroom and other places. You always resort to the past to avoid the present day issues.
Do you kiss your framed photo of David Duke each night before you go to sleep ?
Struck a nerve? You give yourself too much credit, echo. Your insinuation that I'm a racist cuz I said you were full of shit for calling trump a divider is low, even for your usual uninformed liberal left wing drivel. And just ftr, the white supremecists in yesterday's melee, along w/ every other one in the country & world, for that matter, can go f themselves, same as any other group that puts one race ahead or different than another. To call what trump said yesterday him being a divider is just another shot by the left that has no merit whatsoever. He's said a lot of stupid shit, this ain't one of them.
Last edited:
