rgc, I understand and respect your position. The US had mostly open immigration in the late 18th century and early 19th century. John Adams and the Federalists imposed certain laws extending the time period for citizenship from 5 to 14 years but this was mostly a ploy
to control the electorate. In the late 1800s, the Chinese Exclusion Act and the Alien Contractor Labor laws were enacted that restricted certain workers from immigrating. The Immigration Act of 1882 levied a head tax on immigrants and blocked the entry of "idiots, lunatics, convicts, and persons likely to become a public charge." My ancestors came over from Ireland in the 1850s so apparently avoided the Immigration Act. Lucky for me! It also banned virtually all asians, including people from India as they were deemed by Court ruling not to be white.
The Immigration Act of 1924 set quotas on the number of immigrants from certain countries. This law was apparently aimed at primarily Catholics, Muslims and Jews.
The US has a long history of limiting or even prohibiting non-white, non-protestant people from immigrating and most of those laws are clearly discriminatory. So when people assume that current bans on Muslim countries are racist, you can at least understand why they might think that.
There should be a serious discussion about immigration but I suspect that our politicians (as well as many of our fellow Board posters) are not up for that. It is much easier to demonize illegal immigrants and refer to them as animals infesting our country.
I am liberal and feel that we have a duty to help our fellow man. I try to do that in my personal life and support spending my tax dollars on that as opposed to using my tax dollars to send our troops throughout the world to kill people. I think that immigrants can be a boon for the economy. I also think that it will change the racial makeup of our country. We have always been a white-majority nation and many people feel uncomfortable with the thought of being in the minority. I don't feel uncomfortable with that concept.
So why not make our immigration laws simpler. Allow anyone to come to the US provided they (1) have no criminal background; and (2) can communicate in English. Provided they obey the law and become contributing members of our society, I would propose that they can earn citizenship within a certain number of years, i.e., 5, 7, etc. If they are convicted of a violent crime or one involving moral turpitude (i.e. identity theft, kiddie porn, etc.) within that time period, they forfeit any right to citizenship and will be deported instantly.
I don't expect everyone (or perhaps even anyone) to agree with this premise but it is at least a start.
Interesting.
It was a fair attempt.
Open boarders will never work. Every nation in the world has boarders and protects them. What other nation endorses a policy as you just laid out?
I also notice assimilate wasn't on your list. If people don't assimilate then there becomes here. So why would we want there to become here if they are fleeing their? I also don't remember you being this vocal about immigration when president Obama was in office. Where you surprised president Obama separated families who any fanfare?
There is nothing wrong with coming through the front door.
My family fled Nazi Germany in the late 30's just as the nazi's were rounding up the Jews. They had to come through yhe front door and there was no asylum gor Jews back then.
Most people want to help people, charities are a great thing, but it's a FACT illegal immigrants take more from this country than give back.
It's a shame those who do not want to wait their turn suffer
I like you brother. You are a fair soul, but being this far in debt to China, and taking on this burden makes no sense for our children
Last edited: