ADVERTISEMENT

Notre Dame excuses already growing tiresome

G_a_r_y

ND Expert
Jul 8, 2010
1,076
145
63
Young roster shouldn't get a pass for struggles

Following a second loss in three games to begin 2016, Notre Dame coach Brian Kelly nearly made it through the weekend without falling back on a tired excuse.



He didn't mention it once in an albeit-abbreviated post-game press conference late Saturday night.


But Sunday, there it was.


"Any guy that we put on the field (on defense) now is a true freshman. We're playing true freshman."



And again.


"We put 10 guys in the NFL last year. We've asked a lot of young players to step up into new roles."


And again.


"When you have first-time starters...the consistency of performance is where you're going to be exposed."


Now, to be fair, Kelly has been peppered with questions from the media throughout the fall on the youth of the Irish roster, particularly on defense. Disciplinary actions and injuries have thrust true freshmen into bigger roles than expected.


But that isn't an exoneration.


On the eve of Ohio State's beatdown of Oklahoma in Norman last Saturday, Coach Urban Meyer listed 31 freshmen and sophomores on his two-deep. Only six players listed as starters or co-starters against the Sooners were listed as such against Notre Dame in last year's Fiesta Bowl.


Alabama's pre-season two-deep roster this season listed 11 true freshmen, many of whom have already played big roles in the Crimson Tide's 3-0 start.


Now, this isn't to say that Notre Dame is on par with Ohio State and Alabama as a program, because it isn't. The Irish aren't even in the same stratosphere at this point. The Crimson Tide and Buckeyes finished first and third, respectively, in last year's recruiting rankings, per Rivals.com. Meyer and Nick Saban are inserting four- and five-star talents into starting positions, but these kids are as inexperienced in the college game as the players Notre Dame is having to put onto the field.


While the Irish's freshmen and sophomores may not be as elite, the message is constantly driven home that Notre Dame recruits a special kind of athlete, ones that are smart, driven and highly teachable.


Shouldn't they be performing at a higher level then?


In the hours and days following the Michigan State defeat, Kelly has pointed more to the failure of the coaching staff to properly prepare the team. He has stopped short of directly blaming defensive coordinator Brian VanGorder for another sub-par defensive performance, instead opting to point fingers at the entire staff - including himself - for the team's struggles.


"It's our job as coaches to see how we can develop our players more efficiently," Kelly said. "These are the players we recruited to Notre Dame. These are the players that are going to play for us. It's our job as coaches to coach them better and get them in position to make the plays necessary for us to be successful."


As the season grinds on - and with that the potential for additional losses - more questions regarding roster inexperience will surely be thrown at Kelly.


Here's the right answer: "Youth is not an excuse."

http://www.news-sentinel.com/sports/ndu/COLUMN--Notre-Dame-excuses-already-growing-tiresome
 
That excuse would be mildly tolerable if the defense had not sucked the previous 2 years. In year 3 of torrid defensive performance it nothing but an excuse and not a reason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HuddleBurger
Sounds like Narduzzi getting some of the same questions at PITT.

If Pitt can keep teams under 35 we can win all the rest of the games?


Excerpt:

The question appeared to either anger or surprise Pitt coach Pat Narduzzi when it surfaced Monday near the end of his weekly news conference. Perhaps it did both. A reporter wanted to know if Narduzzi planned any personnel changes to his defense after it allowed 84 points and 1,046 total yards the past two weeks. “No,” he said. “For what? Can you play corner?”............
It's not the players, Narduzzi said. It's the techniques they use. He said the problems might be structural, too, indicating he's making the wrong calls. “Sometimes, we can change the coverage up a little bit, which we did (in the second half of the Oklahoma State game),” he said. “Obviously, we didn't do it quite enough or early enough. We had some things that maybe we didn't use that we should have or could have.”

“It's our job to coach them up, and I have complete confidence in both of those guys.”.................“There were times we didn't get the pressure we needed on the quarterback and we left the defensive backs out to dry.”
 
Sounds like Narduzzi getting some of the same questions at PITT.

If Pitt can keep teams under 35 we can win all the rest of the games?


Excerpt:

The question appeared to either anger or surprise Pitt coach Pat Narduzzi when it surfaced Monday near the end of his weekly news conference. Perhaps it did both. A reporter wanted to know if Narduzzi planned any personnel changes to his defense after it allowed 84 points and 1,046 total yards the past two weeks. “No,” he said. “For what? Can you play corner?”............
It's not the players, Narduzzi said. It's the techniques they use. He said the problems might be structural, too, indicating he's making the wrong calls. “Sometimes, we can change the coverage up a little bit, which we did (in the second half of the Oklahoma State game),” he said. “Obviously, we didn't do it quite enough or early enough. We had some things that maybe we didn't use that we should have or could have.”

“It's our job to coach them up, and I have complete confidence in both of those guys.”.................“There were times we didn't get the pressure we needed on the quarterback and we left the defensive backs out to dry.”
The big difference is that Narduzzi is in his second year as HC, Kelly is in his 7th year.
 
Um............... So if this is the case, why has the D been asked to win the game in both losses? OT you score in one play. Go for 2 win the game with your best side of the ball. MSU 3rd and 2- run the ball. Gives you a manageable 4th or possibly a first down. Instead pass, take a sack, punt the ball to a team that is really good at eating clock. Yep, really sounds like young kids cost ND those games.
 
Um............... So if this is the case, why has the D been asked to win the game in both losses? OT you score in one play. Go for 2 win the game with your best side of the ball. MSU 3rd and 2- run the ball. Gives you a manageable 4th or possibly a first down. Instead pass, take a sack, punt the ball to a team that is really good at eating clock. Yep, really sounds like young kids cost ND those games.
Post more read less....
 
Coming after next season to Coach 8 & 4...be ready

death.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: cgvr
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT