First you need to grade the linemen blocking on each play !We would need to look at the success rates.
Doesnt anyone other than echowaker understand football basics ?
First you need to grade the linemen blocking on each play !We would need to look at the success rates.
You don't grade the linemen to grade the RBs...DM isn't waiting on Harry to grade the Linemen before he can grade his RBs.First you need to grade the linemen blocking on each play !
Doesnt anyone other than echowaker understand football basics ?
That is pretty close to the success rate. For example success on 3rd down = 100% of the yardage necessary. Estime converted a 3rd and 13 successfully. That is a lot harder than his 1 yard TD run.You grade the rbs on did they do what they were supposed to and get what they should have gotten out of the play. Then you get into the extra yardage more than what was expected. This is where Estime shines.
yeah but you typically get call it bonus points for making people miss, running through tackles, and seeing a better hole that the play wasn't designed forThat is pretty close to the success rate. For example success on 3rd down = 100% of the yardage necessary. Estime converted a 3rd and 13 successfully. That is a lot harder than his 1 yard TD run.
Ask echowaker to help you out.You don't grade the linemen to grade the RBs...DM isn't waiting on Harry to grade the Linemen before he can grade his RBs.
You grade the rbs on did they do what they were supposed to and get what they should have gotten out of the play. Then you get into the extra yardage more than what was expected. This is where Estime shines.
They will also look at the play was designed for X but Y became open, to the RB see Y. That's where vision comes into play. I don't know DMs grading formula but when you do it a lot it's easy despite having a lot going into it.
What does that have to do with grading the rb? That is more on grading of the olineAsk echowaker to help you out.
No hole, no gain !
There’s a correlation between the performance of the OL and the performance of the RB’sWhat does that have to do with grading the rb? That is more on grading of the oline
That’s why they use the averageTo me it looked like diggs had about 5 good runs for 60 of his yards and 5-10
Bad to average runs where estime had about 12 good runs and 2-4 bad to average runs
no doubt for YPC. I would bet a lot of money that estime graded out better though.That’s why they use the average
ok, but what does that have to do with grading rbs. A running back can get a good grade and have a bad YPC if the oline plays terrible.There’s a correlation between the performance of the OL and the performance of the RB’s
Estime was much better today againYPC has been your bell cow through the first 4-5 games, disregarding a clear injury to Diggs..now he’s only bettered AE due to AE wearing down the Clemson D in the first quarter- hilarious.
And what, A man can’t talk to himself?
Yeah it’s not even close … if there’s no hole diggs just slows down and hopes for one to open causing a potential loss of yards, happened a bunch todayEstime was much better today again
Its clearly ridiculous at this point that Tommy boy keeps playing someone more because hes his boy
Estime was better in the run game, pass game,and pass pro