Yeah, but why the F do you think that, though? Just because you like the idea of it, and it does it for you? And we had packages for him as a true frosh, that weren't particularly fruitful or successful by the way.
That's what's annoying. That you just want TB to play, becuase he's 'dynamic', and I don't mean just garbage time, I mean full on play, even if it hurts the team, even if we'd be better served just sticking with SH as starter all the way through. Knowing full that well that having an undisputed, and superior starter take command of the QB position in a given season, is like a cardinal rule of football that all coaches try to achieve and adhere to.
So that's what's annoying. But in you're luck though, because I'm inclined to think that coaches more and more in situations like these will be less averse to playing a younger, or backup QB more so, even to the possible detriment of the team and its fortunes, in order to be proactive about dissuading possible transfers. But it's not because the backup QB is particularly dynamic or not.....