Yeah ..because those teams are better than FSU without their starting QB.
Stop the fake outrage.
If You Have It I Highly Recommended Everyone Listen.....
- Thread starter deadirishpoet
- Start date
Stop the fake outrage.
Ok president of the Paul Finebaum fan club. You lost all credibility years ago when you stated BVG was a a great hire. You couldn't sniff talent if it crawled up your ass.
You do realize that 13-0 are “numbers,” too, right? As to the rest of your points, FSU also didn’t look better in the eye test, which is corroborated by the fact that they couldn’t control their games and dominate their opponents who by and large weren’t very good.
When you continue to talk about “results” “performance,” it becomes clear to me that you do not understand the numbers at all. The issue is that FSU’s PERFORMANCE wasn’t that strong, which is why they could not dominate their opponents, nor could they control their games meaning that it’s highly likely that they’re perfect record is in large part due to luck and circumstance, and unlikely to be repeated if the season were played again.
Georgia is definitely one of the best four teams and is better than Alabama. Georgia would be favored over Alabama if they played tomorrow. Georgia would be favored over Washington by quite a bit. If they play tomorrow Georgia would be favored over Texas. Now Georgia blew it by losing to a lesser team in Alabama and so Alabama you could say deserves it but there’s nothing that points to the fact that Alabama is better than Georgia.
If it were up to me, I would have Georgia as part of the top four. I don’t think FSU got screwed at all.
Georgia would be favored over every team with the exception of Michigan maybe.
Ohio State will be favored over everyone except for Michigan and Georgia
Georgia will be favored over everyone except for maybe Michigan. Ohio State will be favored over everyone except for Michigan and Georgia.
FSU done everything that was asked of the and finished with an untarnished record.
I read your reasoning why and performance is what caught my eye. So is that performance throughout the season, or performance on the final game prior to the playoff voting
Quite honestly yes.
The committee is charged with finding the best 4 teams.
Oh the outrage for FSU! 🤣🤣
Refuse to participate in 12-team playoff and force a renegotiation so that the SEC is never at risk of being left out.
What I don't get is why it isn't the 4 most deserving based on resume instead of trying to figure which are the 4 best. I hate the idea of choosing the 4 best instead of the 4 most deserving.
Yea, the numbers that matter MOST. ACTUAL RESULTS!
As for eye test, that's all based on a person's opinion. I prefer the former, results on the field. Bama and Texas have blemishes, FSU does not.
The idea that the SEC would refuse to participate in a playoff is nonsense.
Maybe the committee felt it wasn't.
It would be interesting to know how much pull the SEC actually have
Here's a thought: five of the top ten revenue producing schools are in the SEC: Bama, Ga, LSU, TAMU and Florida. And Texas is on the list as pending in the SEC. That kind of clout counts....at least it does for those of us who follow the money.
On its face it's nonsense, but it's not nonsense if they are left out of a playoff.
How are they going to participate if they are not included?
Thats literally what Michael Slive said according to Rich Neuheisel who was in the committee room when it was said
Not knowing the in's and, out's of it could they (SEC) boycott and lock down other sports forcing ESPN/CBS to fill with unwatchable garbage for starters
Not likely. They would then be ceding the championships and television dollars to the other conferences. That doesn't make a lot of sense.
TO PROVE A POINT BECAUSE THEY WOULD BE REACTING TO LOSING OUT ON THAT.
I really feel like you lack the cognitive ability to connect two dots.
They would prove a point by not playing for championships and losing money? Gotcha.
🤦
We found the short bus member.
The CFP would be losing out on money. Just a hint on the right answer. That's why the original comment was "take THEIR BALL (fan eyeballs and influence) and go home (refuse to participate).
You don't know what you are talking about. The SEC would be crazy to do this. We are done.
