This is such BS. If they would have put in Bama everyone would have been crying that they are partial to the SEC and saying tcu deserves to be in.Thanks for being politically correct and completely gutless. Embarassment
Thanks for being politically correct and completely gutless. Embarassment
Spreading the opportunities around / Bama-SEC fatigue. TCU like Cinncy last year a sentimental pick. if TCU played Bama schedule they would have 4 loses and the team that beat TCU got taken to the woodshed by Bama. I much rather watch a real football game for a national championship contest and Bama vs ga would have been a worthy watchWhat does political correctness have to fo with it?
Spreading the opportunities around / Bama-SEC fatigue. TCU like Cinncy last year a sentimental pick. if TCU played Bama schedule they would have 4 loses and the team that beat TCU got taken to the woodshed by Bama. I much rather watch a real football game for a national championship contest and Bama vs ga would have been a worthy watch
that’s my point, don’t be politically correct just put the best teams in. And Bama vs ga would have been a helluva game. Young now fully recovered and Bama just dismantled the team that beat TCU. the committee knows it and saw the game but proved gutless and went with sentimental favorite—TCU. And the fans got screwed and had to watch this vomitThis is such BS. If they would have put in Bama everyone would have been crying that they are partial to the SEC and saying tcu deserves to be in.
The talent gap from the top teams is obvious. In reality, Michigan beats TCU 9 out of 10 times. They just happened to lose the 1 out of 10. Michigan I think would’ve been a much better game. Though I still think Georgia would beat them by 10 or more points.
that’s my point, don’t be politically correct just put the best teams in. And Bama vs ga would have been a helluva game. Young now fully recovered and Bama just dismantled the team that beat TCU. the committee knows it and saw the game but proved gutless and went with sentimental favorite—TCU. And the fans got screwed and had to watch this vomit
Of course I realize that, so what? you don’t think Bama is one of the 4 best teams is that what you’re trying to tell me? They should have been in over OSU and TCUYou do realize that Ohio St. was the 4 seed, right? So if Bama got in, they would have been # 4 and TCU would still have played Michigan. You also realize that TCU was ranked ahead of Bama in the polls, right?
If you knew what you were talking about, you would be dangerous.
Of course I realize that, so what? you don’t think Bama is one of the 4 best teams is that what you’re trying to tell me? They should have been in over OSU and TCU
I thought the committe’s job was picking the 4 best teams now? So Bama at end of season wasn’t one of the 4 best in your mind? did you watch the tenn game? maybe the poorest officiated game I’ve ever seen—17 penalties for 130 yds for Bama vs 6 for tenn. So 2 sec road games that both went to the last play of the game. Meanwhile OSU gets blown out at home. Obviously that’s what the committee is looking at—2 loses—- I get it. But they didn’t pick the 4 best teams and that is their mandateBama should have beaten LSU and Tennessee. They didn't.
I thought the committe’s job was picking the 4 best teams now? So Bama at end of season wasn’t one of the 4 best in your mind? did you watch the tenn game? maybe the poorest officiated game I’ve ever seen—17 penalties for 130 yds for Bama vs 6 for tenn. So 2 sec road games that both went to the last play of the game. Meanwhile OSU gets blown out at home. Obviously that’s what the committee is looking at—2 loses—- I get it. But they didn’t pick the 4 best teams and that is their mandate
It’s not about having sympathy, no one on this board is a Bama fan. Fact remains , ( and yes it’s my opinion) , Bama was one of the 4 best teams. There has been a lot of complaints about sec bias and many are tired of Bama dominance but the committee got it dead wrong. Bama is a Vegas favorite vs Michigan, OSU and TCUYou are entitled to your opinion. The people who make the decisions don't agree with you. Bama lost two games this year. I have zero sympathy for them.
If they were picking the 4 best teams, why would Bama get in over LSU or UT- they lost to both?I thought the committe’s job was picking the 4 best teams now? So Bama at end of season wasn’t one of the 4 best in your mind? did you watch the tenn game? maybe the poorest officiated game I’ve ever seen—17 penalties for 130 yds for Bama vs 6 for tenn. So 2 sec road games that both went to the last play of the game. Meanwhile OSU gets blown out at home. Obviously that’s what the committee is looking at—2 loses—- I get it. But they didn’t pick the 4 best teams and that is their mandate
It’s not about having sympathy, no one on this board is a Bama fan. Fact remains , ( and yes it’s my opinion) , Bama was one of the 4 best teams. There has been a lot of complaints about sec bias and many are tired of Bama dominance but the committee got it dead wrong. Bama is a Vegas favorite vs Michigan, OSU and TCU
4 best teams at end of season is when selections are made. its the 4 best teams at that point and I believe Bama was one of them. I don’t think at end of season lsu or ut were better then Bama. I get your point though. I would add this though , bama’s loses were not nearly as bad as lsu’s or ut’s and they beat Bama at home and last play of the game.If they were picking the 4 best teams, why would Bama get in over LSU or UT- they lost to both?
4 best teams at end of season is when selections are made. its the 4 best teams at that point and I believe Bama was one of them. I don’t think at end of season lsu or ut were better then Bama. I get your point though. I would add this though , bama’s loses were not nearly as bad as lsu’s or ut’s and they beat Bama at home and last play of the game.
ButI thought the committe’s job was picking the 4 best teams now? So Bama at end of season wasn’t one of the 4 best in your mind? did you watch the tenn game? maybe the poorest officiated game I’ve ever seen—17 penalties for 130 yds for Bama vs 6 for tenn. So 2 sec road games that both went to the last play of the game. Meanwhile OSU gets blown out at home. Obviously that’s what the committee is looking at—2 loses—- I get it. But they didn’t pick the 4 best teams and that is their mandate
i agree with both points. but I also don’t think a w/L record always tells the whole story. Case in point was tenn/ Ala. , I think Ala probably wins 9 of 10 times it was an atrocious performance by the refs. and are your loses at home? on the road? who played/ who didn’t? My point is at end of season Bama was healthy and playing good ball and I think they were as good as anyone.I hope we never get to the point where odds makers pick teams that go to the playoffs. Teams should be rewarded for performance on the field.
Maybe not 9 out of 10, but at least 7 out of 10. TCU got quite lucky.The talent gap from the top teams is obvious. In reality, Michigan beats TCU 9 out of 10 times. They just happened to lose the 1 out of 10. Michigan I think would’ve been a much better game. Though I still think Georgia would beat them by 10 or more points.
Still waiting---what was Bama's best win? Mississippi St? Ole Miss? Arkansa
Over the course of a season, by outperforming opposiron defenses and offenses on a per play level and overall game control, they were either a top 2 or top 3 team. Georgia‘s the best team, but you Bama would give every team a fight.Still waiting---what was Bama's best win? Mississippi St? Ole Miss? Arkansas?
K state / Texas K state beat TCU and got waxed by Bama. OSU / Michigan what were their great wins? I think bama’s sos was top 5 in countryStill waiting---what was Bama's best win? Mississippi St? Ole Miss? Arkansas?
They needed to win at least one of those they lost4 best teams at end of season is when selections are made. its the 4 best teams at that point and I believe Bama was one of them. I don’t think at end of season lsu or ut were better then Bama. I get your point though. I would add this though , bama’s loses were not nearly as bad as lsu’s or ut’s and they beat Bama at home and last play of the game.
i agree with both points. but I also don’t think a w/L record always tells the whole story. Case in point was tenn/ Ala. , I think Ala probably wins 9 of 10 times it was an atrocious performance by the refs. and are your loses at home? on the road? who played/ who didn’t? My point is at end of season Bama was healthy and playing good ball and I think they were as good as anyone.
If they were that good they would have beaten LSU or Tennessee.Of course I realize that, so what? you don’t think Bama is one of the 4 best teams is that what you’re trying to tell me? They should have been in over OSU and TCU
We’re a lot closer than TCU. If you look at the 247 talent composite rankings, ND has nearly more 4 stars than anyone.The debate over who should have gotten in is secondary. We could argue all day, which I won't.
But what is interesting is the gap between Georgia and TCU...elite vs less than that. I also consider Ohio State and Alabama elite.
As others noted, TCU got a Michigan team that choked. But got exposed against the Dawgs.
More importantly to me, this speaks to how far Notre Dame is from elite.
True, won/loss records don't always tell the story, but in most sports they are the SOLE CRITERION for making the playoffs. In fact, I can't think of any PRO SPORT where they aren't, and college football is now TRENDING more and more TOWARDS that same sort of PRO FORMAT, now that it's athletes are UNEQUIVOCAL SEMI-PROS.i agree with both points. but I also don’t think a w/L record always tells the whole story. Case in point was tenn/ Ala. , I think Ala probably wins 9 of 10 times it was an atrocious performance by the refs. and are your loses at home? on the road? who played/ who didn’t? My point is at end of season Bama was healthy and playing good ball and I think they were as good as anyone.
Yeah, NCAA -- why don't we just let Bama play Georgia 13 times a year and cut out college football. Georgia in recruiting since 2018 1-2-1-4-3 (25 five stars, even Bama only had 19)... Don't know how non semi-pro programs like ND will ever compete. Amazing what Dabo did at Clemson (he did have the best QB of the last ten years -- before Caleb -- in Trevor.)that’s my point, don’t be politically correct just put the best teams in. And Bama vs ga would have been a helluva game. Young now fully recovered and Bama just dismantled the team that beat TCU. the committee knows it and saw the game but proved gutless and went with sentimental favorite—TCU. And the fans got screwed and had to watch this vomit
I felt bad in the fourth quarter one Georgia had its back ups and the third stringers, many of them true freshman, destroying the TCU offensive and defensive lines. Beck looks really good, too.The debate over who should have gotten in is secondary. We could argue all day, which I won't.
But what is interesting is the gap between Georgia and TCU...elite vs less than that. I also consider Ohio State and Alabama elite.
As others noted, TCU got a Michigan team that choked. But got exposed against the Dawgs.
More importantly to me, this speaks to how far Notre Dame is from elite.
U r so wrong.Thanks for being politically correct and completely gutless. Embarassment
TCU packed it in at that point. It wasn't indicative of anything other than TCU wanted the hell on the plane homeI felt bad in the fourth quarter one Georgia had its back ups and the third stringers, many of them true freshman, destroying the TCU offensive and defensive lines. Beck looks really good, too.