ADVERTISEMENT

Evan Sharpley

If that is true, he absolutely should be removed. I didn't see that. Perhaps that was a decision of the moderators because of content we did not see . We saw very little of the entire exchange. Maybe we should have. That was a choice of the moderators. An explanation should be provided. We all know it won't.

Maybe you should just go elsewhere. By now, you should have become aware that you are not held in high regard here.
 
Maybe you should just go elsewhere. By now, you should have become aware that you are not held in high regard here.
To you and your ilk perhaps, but to others who only wish to discuss the realities of ND differently. You have never contributed one ounce of anything worthy to discuss here. All of your comments have been to belittle others. (Go back, and check them) You denigrate, belittle and attempt to humiliate. You are a rather despicable character, both as a fan and a person. I understanding your lack of comprehending this. If you and your clique are what has transformed into what discussion about ND has become, well, it explains a lot about why the out side hates ND so much. The challenges ND faces is not just our religious background, our morals and principals, but the smug, elitist attitude of so many like you portray outside of the University. If there ever was an example of why people dislike ND, it is you. Feel comfortable with yourself. You have a lot to learn from life, but it appears you are incapable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buguit
To you and your ilk perhaps, but to others who only wish to discuss the realities of ND differently. You have never contributed one ounce of anything worthy to discuss here. All of your comments have been to belittle others. (Go back, and check them) You denigrate, belittle and attempt to humiliate. You are a rather despicable character, both as a fan and a person. I understanding your lack of comprehending this. If you and your clique are what has transformed into what discussion about ND has become, well, it explains a lot about why the out side hates ND so much. The challenges ND faces is not just our religious background, our morals and principals, but the smug, elitist attitude of so many like you portray outside of the University. If there ever was an example of why people dislike ND, it is you. Feel comfortable with yourself. You have a lot to learn from life, but it appears you are incapable.

This coming from a person who lies about being an ND grad. This coming from a person who accuses other posters of group masturbation. This coming from a person who makes jokes about the age of other posters. This coming from a person who calls others irrelevant. This coming from a person who trolls an ND board simply to take shots at ND. Take a look in the mirror, fraud.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hvillebill
To you and your ilk perhaps, but to others who only wish to discuss the realities of ND differently. You have never contributed one ounce of anything worthy to discuss here. All of your comments have been to belittle others. (Go back, and check them) You denigrate, belittle and attempt to humiliate. You are a rather despicable character, both as a fan and a person. I understanding your lack of comprehending this. If you and your clique are what has transformed into what discussion about ND has become, well, it explains a lot about why the out side hates ND so much. The challenges ND faces is not just our religious background, our morals and principals, but the smug, elitist attitude of so many like you portray outside of the University. If there ever was an example of why people dislike ND, it is you. Feel comfortable with yourself. You have a lot to learn from life, but it appears you are incapable.

More of the usual BS we have come to expect from you. You repeatedly try to predict the demise of ND, both on and off the field. No one but you believes your "sky is falling" mantra. No one but you is predicting the death spiral. You are laughable, a caricature of the gloom and doom set. Stop the moralizing and start trying to understand why so are so universally reviled.
 
The insults cut both ways, I'm sure the likes you get are posters who agree with you and not me. It's a tit for tat thingy.

What does that even mean?

If you have rules, then have rules. If not..then don't. But this partial selective enforcement of such might be even more childish than a subject poster.

Moreover are you implying with the above statement that everything is perfectly fine if both parties are insulting each other? Obviously that makes zero sense.

Also are you implying I'm insulting or being insulted if someone agrees or disagrees with me?

Or I only get likes to a post if I were insulting to someone. ?
I may have strong opinions regarding things and don't word things softly...however I do not directly insult individuals even if they choose to do so. They may not fully understand something so their reaction to lash out is fine. I've thick skin.

The board will do what it wishes but it's ridiculous to see all these people thumping the rule book when they often times are the first ones throwing insults out there if someone challenges their opinion in a very civil and mature way.

Lastly..I don't remember the porn thing and yes that should be banned. However you take the most extreme example that I failed to mention (porn) to justify the board overriding our block or no block decision.

So let's add...
Death threats, threats of harm , posting porn or any bizarre strange pictures not appropriate.
But those things should be common sense automatic ban, no?

Insults and the like..I echo again either you allow us to ignore or not and apply the rules to everyone or not. That's all I'd appreciate. Not reinventing the wheel.
Thanks.
 
If that is true, he absolutely should be removed. I didn't see that. Perhaps that was a decision of the moderators because of content we did not see . We saw very little of the entire exchange. Maybe we should have. That was a choice of the moderators. An explanation should be provided. We all know it won't.

cvgr did not say Kelly did anything illegal.
 
88 - The post from cgvr was removed by the mods. He basically invented figures that he was posting to show Kelly and his wife were stealing from Kelly's charity. A few other posters had commented on the post also but they quoted the original post and those have also been removed. Come on now, questioning the coach for his football is one thing, but accusing him of fraud and criminal activity? You really think that's ok?


He posted open info and let the public decide. do you feel proud of yourself
 
To you and your ilk perhaps, but to others who only wish to discuss the realities of ND differently. You have never contributed one ounce of anything worthy to discuss here. All of your comments have been to belittle others. (Go back, and check them) You denigrate, belittle and attempt to humiliate. You are a rather despicable character, both as a fan and a person. I understanding your lack of comprehending this. If you and your clique are what has transformed into what discussion about ND has become, well, it explains a lot about why the out side hates ND so much. The challenges ND faces is not just our religious background, our morals and principals, but the smug, elitist attitude of so many like you portray outside of the University. If there ever was an example of why people dislike ND, it is you. Feel comfortable with yourself. You have a lot to learn from life, but it appears you are incapable.


HH, what john0gaunt saying about cvgr is not true. a reach out
 
Take it up with the mods princess.
See...the double standard here is off the charts.
The above statement coming from someone who is all in favor of banning cgvr yet in this very same thread is throwing out the sarcastic insults.

I've think skin and I'm sure zona was fine with you calling him princess but don't point to the rules then break them yourself.
 
What does that even mean?

If you have rules, then have rules. If not..then don't. But this partial selective enforcement of such might be even more childish than a subject poster.

Moreover are you implying with the above statement that everything is perfectly fine if both parties are insulting each other? Obviously that makes zero sense.

Also are you implying I'm insulting or being insulted if someone agrees or disagrees with me?

Or I only get likes to a post if I were insulting to someone. ?
I may have strong opinions regarding things and don't word things softly...however I do not directly insult individuals even if they choose to do so. They may not fully understand something so their reaction to lash out is fine. I've thick skin.

The board will do what it wishes but it's ridiculous to see all these people thumping the rule book when they often times are the first ones throwing insults out there if someone challenges their opinion in a very civil and mature way.

Lastly..I don't remember the porn thing and yes that should be banned. However you take the most extreme example that I failed to mention (porn) to justify the board overriding our block or no block decision.

So let's add...
Death threats, threats of harm , posting porn or any bizarre strange pictures not appropriate.
But those things should be common sense automatic ban, no?

Insults and the like..I echo again either you allow us to ignore or not and apply the rules to everyone or not. That's all I'd appreciate. Not reinventing the wheel.
Thanks.

I'm not implying that insulting each other is okay. It's what this board has dissolved into since there is no moderating of said board except by posters. Unless notified, the mods don't know who is posting out of bounds. Back in the day of Wax, he would post a warning when posters were treading on thin ice. (language, personal attacks and so on) If you have issues email a mod. It's pretty simple to me, read the rules, follow the rules and you won't worry about getting banned.
You seem to be nitpicking at issues that to me are common sense, but if we all thought alike the world would be a boring place.
........and no, I'm not implying that you insult folks with likes, posts or whatever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bodizephax
88 - Are you able to read? Whatever that case, I'm done trying to spell things out for your tiny little brain. Tiny, tiny, tiny little brain. If I had broken a rule, I would have heard about it. Try to wear some man pants next time you login here. Maybe make a contribution.
Not necessarily. I'm not saying you broke any rules, but surely the rules only apply to some
 
Not true Dip.

1 - Is 88 an alias of yours? Otherwise the post wasn't meant for you.
2 - The rules apply to all of us.
 
Not true Dip.

1 - Is 88 an alias of yours? Otherwise the post wasn't meant for you.
2 - The rules apply to all of us.
I don't have the time to be two different posters, and weather is was meant for me is irrelevant
Surely you've seen what being posted, and what some are able to get away with.
 
Dip, honestly don't know what you are referring to.

There's a difference between questioning the coach's football coaching or the staff's knowledge, and questioning each of us as to our opinions.

And then posting phony numbers accusing the head coach of ND and his wife of stealing from their charity. I mean think about it. People may not donate to that charity thinking the dribble is true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bodizephax
88 - Are you able to read? Whatever that case, I'm done trying to spell things out for your tiny little brain. Tiny, tiny, tiny little brain. If I had broken a rule, I would have heard about it. Try to wear some man pants next time you login here. Maybe make a contribution.
Perfectly fine...and anytime you'd like to debate anything football or life...I'll be glad to lend you hand and help educate you on the subject.

Isn't it ironic when the less intelligent accuse the very things they themselves have a short coming of.

If you READ what I posted you'd know I have the thickest skin on the planet...if you were educated classroom or street you'd also have recognized that I want nobody speaking for me board or otherwise. In case you still can't understand that...we have an ignore feature and I suggest if cgvr was bothering to some then block him.

He posed no threat to anyone, apparently didn't post anything x rated, yet people on this very thread are talking about the rules the rules the rules....the VERY same people who break the rules every other thread, like yourself. If you want to continue to sound like you're four years old...I'm good with that. But in the least most four year olds haven't even learned how to be a hypocrite yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BGI User 1596
Perfectly fine...and anytime you'd like to debate anything football or life...I'll be glad to lend you hand and help educate you on the subject.

Isn't it ironic when the less intelligent accuse the very things they themselves have a short coming of.

If you READ what I posted you'd know I have the thickest skin on the planet...if you were educated classroom or street you'd also have recognized that I want nobody speaking for me board or otherwise. In case you still can't understand that...we have an ignore feature and I suggest if cgvr was bothering to some then block him.

He posed no threat to anyone, apparently didn't post anything x rated, yet people on this very thread are talking about the rules the rules the rules....the VERY same people who break the rules every other thread, like yourself. If you want to continue to sound like you're four years old...I'm good with that. But in the least most four year olds haven't even learned how to be a hypocrite yet.

Rather a wide brush you're painting with? Are you accusing me of not following board guidelines since I posted them? This board isn't community owned and the board admin can post all the rules they want to and ban if they see fit.
If I was the editor/owner of this site I wouldn't want rumors about the Kelly Foundation attributed to this site. I would imagine CGVR was on a short leash after his short ban to the corn.
 
break the rules every other thread, like yourself

I'm sorry, I've been on this site a long long time. Never posted anything that would be against any rule. Never been sent to corn, never been banned.

I was the first on this board to call old cgmr out on his crap and have had many flame wars with him. I enjoyed them. It's been pointed out to you a number of times, It isn't about posting x rated or not liking posts. It's about slandering the coach and his charity. Nothing else.
 
Dip, honestly don't know what you are referring to.

There's a difference between questioning the coach's football coaching or the staff's knowledge, and questioning each of us as to our opinions.

And then posting phony numbers accusing the head coach of ND and his wife of stealing from their charity. I mean think about it. People may not donate to that charity thinking the dribble is true.
If you do not know what I'm referring to then I can't help you
 
Rather a wide brush you're painting with? Are you accusing me of not following board guidelines since I posted them? This board isn't community owned and the board admin can post all the rules they want to and ban if they see fit.
If I was the editor/owner of this site I wouldn't want rumors about the Kelly Foundation attributed to this site. I would imagine CGVR was on a short leash after his short ban to the corn.
"Rule: No personal attacks on anybody; fellow posters, BlueandGold.com and Rivals staff, Notre Dame coaches and players, etc.We encourage dialogue, different opinions, and respectful arguments. Name-calling will not be tolerated on these forums, nor will constant attacks of our business practices. BlueandGold.com reserves the right to moderate these posts as they see fit."
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

This was posted by you and I understand you copied and pasted the rules....

I was just merely pointing out that the very first line of the rules you posted are broken every other post by many many poster.

Not you.

In this very thread alone we have people saying how one person should be banned...turn right around and two posts later saying how someone is stupid or can't comprehend etc.

I find the immaturity humorous and the hypocrisy even more so.
 
I'm not implying that insulting each other is okay. It's what this board has dissolved into since there is no moderating of said board except by posters. Unless notified, the mods don't know who is posting out of bounds. Back in the day of Wax, he would post a warning when posters were treading on thin ice. (language, personal attacks and so on) If you have issues email a mod. It's pretty simple to me, read the rules, follow the rules and you won't worry about getting banned.
You seem to be nitpicking at issues that to me are common sense, but if we all thought alike the world would be a boring place.
........and no, I'm not implying that you insult folks with likes, posts or whatever.

Alice,

I googled Kelly cares 990. So I suggest that you do the same. It has the total compensation info and contribution info. good info
 
Good to see you cgmr. I had no idea they would nuke you as they did. Kind of funny though.

You can't be pulling out midyear numbers from a charity and use those numbers to assume any kind of facts about the charity. These could all be mostly startup numbers etc we have no idea. I'm not gonna go into all the reasons you can't be doing that on a ND board, but you can't be doing that here. I'm not lying, I posted that you were doing the accusing. That's what you were doing.

Man they brought down that hammer hard. BOOM! What was that? The bones of cgmr. D*AMN!
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT