ADVERTISEMENT

Deuce Knight

If we hold on to DK, will he be a contender to start as a true frosh? Take the offense in a new direction, or rather the same direction it's going now with RL?
When it comes to signing QB prospects at the high P4 level, just finding a guy who can take 1st team snaps and not kill your team is a challenge in and of itself. The more bodies you bring in, the better chance you have of finding a guy to achieve that goal. The rarer the quality of the prospect, the higher the potential upside.

So bringing in DK (back end 5 star QB prospect) would greatly increase the programs odds of hitting on one of their prospects but its far from any kind of guarantee.
 
If we hold on to DK, will he be a contender to start as a true frosh? Take the offense in a new direction, or rather the same direction it's going now with RL?
I can't see him coming in as a true frosh, and starting. He's pretty raw, as is.

We'll be deep with Angeli, Carr, and Minchey. 1 May transfer, which mean DK is the #3 guy.
 
I can't see him coming in as a true frosh, and starting. He's pretty raw, as is.

We'll be deep with Angeli, Carr, and Minchey. 1 May transfer, which mean DK is the #3 guy.
I don't know if that's going to work. We might as well not even sign him. Not saying he should or shouldn't start, but he's not going to hang around for however many years it takes to take the reins. I mean I hope we do sign him, but if you ponder the matter, I don't see it working out unless he's on the field pretty quick. And to be fair, he could be special. Deluxe dual threat guy. Anyway, just wondering...
 
I can't see him coming in as a true frosh, and starting. He's pretty raw, as is.

We'll be deep with Angeli, Carr, and Minchey. 1 May transfer, which mean DK is the #3 guy.
We'll be deep, but depth isnt the issue on this roster, whats missing is upside. Not too worried about losing DK from a position-scarcity standpoint, but rather from an upside-scarcity standpoint
 
I don't know if that's going to work. We might as well not even sign him. Not saying he should or shouldn't start, but he's not going to hang around for however many years it takes to take the reins. I mean I hope we do sign him, but if you ponder the matter, I don't see it working out unless he's on the field pretty quick. And to be fair, he could be special. Deluxe dual threat guy. Anyway, just wondering...
I hear you. Makes sense.

If it were me making the call (and I'm nothing more than a subway alum/fan), I'd bet on CJ Carr before I bet on Deuce.

If CJ earns the job, then go with him. It would be Deuce's turn next. If he leaves, he leaves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: john0gaunt
I hear you. Makes sense.

If it were me making the call (and I'm nothing more than a subway alum/fan), I'd bet on CJ Carr before I bet on Deuce.

If CJ earns the job, then go with him. It would be Deuce's turn next. If he leaves, he leaves.
Of course you'll bet on CJ Carr, he's actually on campus/signed, while DK is crystal-balled to Auburn as of 9-30-24
 
We'll be deep, but depth isnt the issue on this roster, whats missing is upside. Not too worried about losing DK from a position-scarcity standpoint, but rather from an upside-scarcity standpoint
Would you play DK over Carr?
 
Would you play DK over Carr?
DK is evaluated as the rarer prospect (5 star) to CJ Carr's 4 star so if you are asking me which prospect I'd rather have, its DK for sure. But those prospect rankings mean nothing once the guys get on campus and start getting reps and being evaluated by the coaching staff, so I dont really have an opinion on which one I'd play over the other until I start getting credible feedback on the quality of their reps at this level.
 
We are no longer talking about Angeli, Minchey or Carr?
I don't know, I was just thinking aloud. And since it doesn't look like we're going to switch, and we're going to stick with a running QB, with a genuine dual threat, notwithstanding his poor passing, and we're bringing in this super ballyhooed dual threat five-star type guy, maybe we just stick with that. Everybody wants CJ Carr, who will leapfrog the older guys, and will only be a RS frosh himself, why not just go with someone like this?
 
I think Carr has it and don't care if Knight comes because Carr is starting atleast the next 3 years.
 
I think Carr has it and don't care if Knight comes because Carr is starting atleast the next 3 years.
There's a realistic chance that CJ Carr does not start in 2025.

No one knows for certain who will start next season.
 
One thing's for sure, we've got a good OC for his game. That's pretty much all Denbrock has dealt with and coached the last five/six seasons. If you can plausibly pitch to a guy that I can turn you into the next Jayden Daniels, and Denbrock definitely can that, that's gotta be something very good. So I'm definitely hoping he sticks. He's not another Jayden Daniels, of course. Nobody is, nobody runs like that.
 
I thought you told us Notre Dame is competitive with NIL, that NIL is not an issue at Notre Dame?
It's not. We aren't going to overpay. That's bad business and bad for team culture.

Smart move by ND. And we do t give jobs to recruits parents either

Smart

Swing and a miss by you, again

What's your next stupid comment??
 
It's not. We aren't going to overpay. That's bad business and bad for team culture.

Smart move by ND. And we do t give jobs to recruits parents either

Smart

Swing and a miss by you, again

What's your next stupid comment??
Aaah. The narrative.
 
Aaah. The narrative.
You're so stupid. This had nothing to do with Deuce Knight. It was about Auburns offense and that disagreement.

You had to get involved with your smart ass comments but look foolish.

So what's your next stupid irrelevant comment?
 
  • Like
Reactions: scubavt
Auburn total offense is ranked 34th, ND's offense is ranked 74th.
🤣🤣🤣

They're under 16ppg now against p4 teams

Cal - 14 points
Arkansas - 14 points
Oklahoma - 21 points
Georgia - 13 points

Yeah they're lighting it up

You talk about me can't admitting being wrong.

Like I said last week, our offense is better than Auburns.....and it's not really close either
 
🤣🤣🤣

They're under 16ppg now against p4 teams

Cal - 14 points
Arkansas - 14 points
Oklahoma - 21 points
Georgia - 13 points

Yeah they're lighting it up

You talk about me can't admitting being wrong.

Like I said last week, our offense is better than Auburns.....and it's not really close either
It;s tough to compare offenses the last 4 games when one team is playing the SEC including Georgia, Oklahoma, and Arkansas, and Cal, and Notre Dame is playing Louisville, Miami-Ohio, Purdue, and Northern Illinois.

Those 4 Notre Dame opponents are soft as Charmin.
 
It;s tough to compare offenses the last 4 games when one team is playing the SEC including Georgia, Oklahoma, and Arkansas, and Cal, and Notre Dame is playing Louisville, Miami-Ohio, Purdue, and Northern Illinois.

Those 4 Notre Dame opponents are soft as Charmin.
I only included p4 teams . I didn't include Auburn brutal FCS opponent and the elite New Mexico squad.

Texas Am - 23
Purdue - 66
Louisville- 31

Arkansas gave up 31 to Oklahoma state and 27 to UAB. Just because they are in the sec doesnt automatically mean they play great defense. Cal gave up 39 to Miami
 
I only included p4 teams . I didn't include Auburn brutal FCS opponent and the elite New Mexico squad.

Texas Am - 23
Purdue - 66
Louisville- 31

Arkansas gave up 31 to Oklahoma state and 27 to UAB. Just because they are in the sec doesnt automatically mean they play great defense. Cal gave up 39 to Miami
My point is that when you play Northern Illinois, Purdue, Miami Ohio, and Louisville, you aren’t exactly getting a true gauge of an offense.
 
I only included p4 teams . I didn't include Auburn brutal FCS opponent and the elite New Mexico squad.

Texas Am - 23
Purdue - 66
Louisville- 31

Arkansas gave up 31 to Oklahoma state and 27 to UAB. Just because they are in the sec doesnt automatically mean they play great defense. Cal gave up 39 to Miami
And now it’s Stanford, Georgia Tech, and Navy.
 
My point is that when you play Northern Illinois, Purdue, Miami Ohio, and Louisville, you aren’t exactly getting a true gauge of an offense.
Notice he didn't mention the P4 teams Auburn played:

Georgia
Oklahoma
Arkansas
Cal
 
Notice he didn't mention the P4 teams Auburn played:

Georgia
Oklahoma
Arkansas
Cal
Really??

Can't you even read? Look up 6 posts and notice that you can't read

Less than 16 ppg against p4 teams. Said it last week and again this week

Weak
 
🤣🤣🤣

They're under 16ppg now against p4 teams

Cal - 14 points
Arkansas - 14 points
Oklahoma - 21 points
Georgia - 13 points

Yeah they're lighting it up

You talk about me can't admitting being wrong.

Like I said last week, our offense is better than Auburns.....and it's not really close either
Better coached for sure
 
Really??

Can't you even read? Look up 6 posts and notice that you can't read

Less than 16 ppg against p4 teams. Said it last week and again this week

Weak
but you didn't mention the SPECIFIC P4 teams they faced. Again learn to read.
 
🤣🤣🤣

They're under 16ppg now against p4 teams

Cal - 14 points
Arkansas - 14 points
Oklahoma - 21 points
Georgia - 13 points

Yeah they're lighting it up

You talk about me can't admitting being wrong.

Like I said last week, our offense is better than Auburns.....and it's not really close either
NDinNJ....

You said I didn't mention the SPECIFIC P4 teams.

Not only did I mention them, I wrote how little they scored against each

AGAIN LEARN TO READ. Instead of trying to be a douche because you want to be right against me

LEARN TO READ
 
They are better than nd on offense, worse on D
You dont believe this, do you? It was never true

But I hope Deuce likes that trash offense and the coach might get fired.

He might be back on the market later on
 
Auburn just had almost 500 yards vs Oklahoma, we couldn’t even get to 300 vs Louisville
Nd is 15 if you go by points per game. Auburn is in the 60’s. Maybe when your so bad teams don’t try until you get close to the red zone. LOL
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT