Deserving or Best?
- By 4-4-3
- Under the Dome
- 39 Replies
I think as long as there is an UNWIELDY NUMBER of teams -- ALL THEORETICALLY EQUALLY ELIGIBLE TO QUALIFY -- though VASTLY DIFFERENT AT TIMES in terms of whom they play -- it will be difficult to eliminate the subjective element entirely, so that the argument between whose "better" vs. whose more "deserving" will remain a flashpoint.Well I was exaggerating a bit, in my fulminations, about the relevance of the regular season if you don't have conference auto-bids. But in a sense it's true. It is a free for all at that point, which I thought is what we we're trying to avert. And I'm with you, conference expansion has been a monstrosity, quite manifestly. But I guess that's on account of better TV revenue, and that's like a whole 'nother matter altogether. Bottom line, if we're going to have at large bids, following the model of March Madness, then of course they have to be merit based, whatever that means exactly. And I'm sure there's enough latitude implicit in that guiding principle, to satisfy the SEC. 9-3 just wasn't good enough this year! Even if Bama is probably 'better' than SMU.
But then, many see that sort of debate as just as much a part of the appeal of college football as the actual competition itself. It certainly keeps a lot of telecasters, broadcasters and podcasters jabbering. Message board posters -- and I'm SELF-INCRIMINATING HERE -- as well.