Jim Harbaugh
- Under the Dome
- 90 Replies
So if a player cheats to help his team, the team shouldn't be punished? That is your reasoning? If it isn't proven that the coaches knew of the cheating, the team should be allowed to benefit from the cheating?Of course it matters, if the coaches and administrators don’t know that a player is ineligible, how can they possibly sit him out?
It’s not as simple as you’d like to make it for a number of reasons
The players involved were officially found to be ineligible AFTER they played, NOT before they played.
And the student involved in the tutoring was NOT an employee or representative of the university.
The NCAA’s ruling was an enormous departure from prior precedent, which held that the party involved had to be an employee or representative of university.
In this case, it was a student, NOT an employee or representative of the university.
You’d have to be a total moron to equate the reason for the vacating of the wins in2012-2013 and the blatant and premeditated cheating on the part of Michigan’s coaches
But maybe you’re that stupid
You are an idiot.
Also, Florida State and ND did not have the same record, dummy. ND ended the year 11-1, and FSU ended at 12-1. Florida State played more ranked opponents. And ND's loss was worse.
1993 NCAA Division I-A football season - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org