ADVERTISEMENT

USC

USC hasn't even had to play in the cold yet... I'm ready to watch them play Minny or Bucky in late November.
Shining Jack Nicholson GIF
 
4 losses in Big 10 so far; wonder if fans still happy about changing conferences.
You domers just don't get it. Playing a Michigan and a Wisconsin and a Minnesota and a Penn State isn't the same as playing a MAC and a service academy and an ACC cupcake and another MAC.
 
You domers just don't get it. Playing a Michigan and a Wisconsin and a Minnesota and a Penn State isn't the same as playing a MAC and a service academy and an ACC cupcake and another MAC.

Not much IQ, eh?

:D

You ask for such derision with such a blindingly stupid post.

Even a cursory review of the past 3 years lays to rest your drive by post about ND not playing and beating top teams.
 
you do understand you are an object of abject ridicule here as an absolute example of stupidity?


There is unfortunately a lowest common denominator trolling on all social media.

I NEVER post on SOUNDOFF...where many clowns like this Quix0te thrive.

I am no elitist, but stupidity like this makes me wince...God help such folks IRL.

What motivates them to make such posts?
 
you do understand you are an object of abject ridicule here as an absolute example of stupidity?
I understand that there are several posters on this forum who are intellectually overwhelmed by discussing the issue at hand and therefore resort to childish insults and name-calling. My comments are directed to the more enlightened who opt to debate and discuss in a civil manner.
 
You domers just don't get it. Playing a Michigan and a Wisconsin and a Minnesota and a Penn State isn't the same as playing a MAC and a service academy and an ACC cupcake and another MAC.
Lol.

Mich with 3 losses. Lost to 4 loss USC. lol

ND played Wisky 2+ years ago, won by 28. Since then, Wisky is 25-15. Woo hoo! But Wisky did beat West Mich, South Dakota, Rutgers, NW, AND… Purdont, by 46!!

Minn is 10-10 their last 20 games.

PSU? Annual 9-3 PSU? Okie dokie

Tyx for trying out.
 
I understand that there are several posters on this forum who are intellectually overwhelmed by discussing the issue at hand and therefore resort to childish insults and name-calling. My comments are directed to the more enlightened who opt to debate and discuss in a civil manner.

:D

You start with negative idiotic assertions and expect debate and civility?

Again, you're asking to be put in your place...and BTW: nobody went low level insults, appropriately characterized your lack of intelligence and good will. No apologies, such an attitude is stupid.
 
I love it. Everyone knew this move to the Big 10 was so dumb. Yeah they get more money, but at what cost?
It's not just 'more money', it's going to be about $75 million/yr vs $30 million/yr in the Pac-12. Also, the Big Ten Network has been added to the Comcast basic bundle on the West Coast, something the train wreck Pac-12 Network couldn't do after twelve years of trying. So if the Big Ten gets 3-4 teams in the playoff and you add in the added BTN revenue, USC will probably get a $100 million payout from the Big Ten this year.

USC's record for this year is a trivial issue. When you have decade after decade of schools in the Big Ten and SEC getting three times more revenue than colleges in the other conferences, they simply won't be able to keep up with the Joneses.
 
You domers just don't get it. Playing a Michigan and a Wisconsin and a Minnesota and a Penn State isn't the same as playing a MAC and a service academy and an ACC cupcake and another MAC.
Minnesota lost to UNC at home bud. Minus their starting QB.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BGI User 756
It's not just 'more money', it's going to be about $75 million/yr vs $30 million/yr in the Pac-12. Also, the Big Ten Network has been added to the Comcast basic bundle on the West Coast, something the train wreck Pac-12 Network couldn't do after twelve years of trying. So if the Big Ten gets 3-4 teams in the playoff and you add in the added BTN revenue, USC will probably get a $100 million payout from the Big Ten this year.

USC's record for this year is a trivial issue. When you have decade after decade of schools in the Big Ten and SEC getting three times more revenue than colleges in the other conferences, they simply won't be able to keep up with the Joneses.
Lol. That annual payout hasn’t helped Purdont, and it sure isn’t helping SC in year 1
 
Lol. That annual payout hasn’t helped Purdont, and it sure isn’t helping SC in year 1
The really big bucks start this year. Additionally, the Big Ten and SEC are in cahoots to squeeze even more money out of the TV networks and the CFP, so the chasm between the P2 and the other conferences will grow even wider. USC and Purdue will be just fine.
 
Let this sink in - USC lost to a Michigan team that after 7 games is under a 1,000 yards passing and has committed double digit turnovers. ND still needs to play well. Time will tell and Nov. 30 is still weeks away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BGI User 756
Let this sink in - USC lost to a Michigan team that after 7 games is under a 1,000 yards passing and has committed double digit turnovers. ND still needs to play well. Time will tell and Nov. 30 is still weeks away.
When you lose in South Bend to MAC crappy Northern Illinois, it isn't difficult to allow USC losing on the road to Michigan to sink in.

Not at all.
 
It's not just 'more money', it's going to be about $75 million/yr vs $30 million/yr in the Pac-12. Also, the Big Ten Network has been added to the Comcast basic bundle on the West Coast, something the train wreck Pac-12 Network couldn't do after twelve years of trying. So if the Big Ten gets 3-4 teams in the playoff and you add in the added BTN revenue, USC will probably get a $100 million payout from the Big Ten this year.

USC's record for this year is a trivial issue. When you have decade after decade of schools in the Big Ten and SEC getting three times more revenue than colleges in the other conferences, they simply won't be able to keep up with the Joneses.
Dork.
 
When you lose in South Bend to MAC crappy Northern Illinois, it isn't difficult to allow USC losing on the road to Michigan to sink in.

Not at all.
Rinse and repeat. You didn’t harp on Kelly for his bad losses? Are you racist?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Golson5
Rinse and repeat. You didn’t harp on Kelly for his bad losses? Are you racist?
I don’t harp on anyone until posters take shots and mock other head coaches in the business.

“Don’t throw stones when you live in a glass house.”
 
I don’t harp on anyone until posters take shots and mock other head coaches in the business.

“Don’t throw stones when you live in a glass house.”
Chip was .500 at UCLA, with some really bad losses, you praise him.

Lincoln is 11-9 in last 20 games. You won’t criticize.

Norvell beats your precious Kelly, but losses 6 in a row this year. But no blunt assessment.

MF is 6-1, 2 wins over ranked teams, and you brought up the clunker at least 50 times in 20 threads.

We can do the math…
 
Chip was .500 at UCLA, with some really bad losses, you praise him.

Lincoln is 11-9 in last 20 games. You won’t criticize.

Norvell beats your precious Kelly, then losses 6 in a row. But no blunt assessment.

MF is 6-1, 2 wins over ranked teams, and you brought up the clunker at least 50 times in 20 threads.

We can do the math…
Cherry picking stats to fit a narrative.
 
I don’t harp on anyone until posters take shots and mock other head coaches in the business.

“Don’t throw stones when you live in a glass house.”
I dont understand the logic here.

So a poster on a message board comments on another head coach from a team you don't root for, so that means you have to put down the head coach of the team you claim to be a fan of

That is a very odd thing to do and something I've never come across before.

And the guys you are standing up for haven't been as good as the head coach of your supposed team

Very odd behavior
 
  • Like
Reactions: BGI User 756
I dont understand the logic here.

So a poster on a message board comments on another head coach from a team you don't root for, so that means you have to put down the head coach of the team you claim to be a fan of

That is a very odd thing to do and something I've never come across before.

And the guys you are standing up for haven't been as good as the head coach of your supposed team

Very odd behavior
Maybe a highly paid head coach will lose Saturday, and you can sit on your couch and start a thread about it.

You’ve done it before.

But when Notre Dame loses, you disappear.
 
Cherry picking stats to fit a narrative.
Lol, so weak. My stats were 2-5 years.

^ Says the guy that has brought up the NIU game 50 times at least …without any mention on AM and Ville and Purdue/Stan blowouts
 
Maybe a highly paid head coach will lose Saturday, and you can sit on your couch and start a thread about it.

You’ve done it before.

But when Notre Dame loses, you disappear.
You avoided that one

🤣🤣

You really are a SC fan
 
  • Like
Reactions: BGI User 756
Maybe a highly paid head coach will lose Saturday, and you can sit on your couch and start a thread about it.

You’ve done it before.

But when Notre Dame loses, you disappear.
As opposed to sitting on your classroom stool?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT