USC hasn't even had to play in the cold yet... I'm ready to watch them play Minny or Bucky in late November.
They won't this yearUSC hasn't even had to play in the cold yet... I'm ready to watch them play Minny or Bucky in late November.
Have no idea what he said but you called him a joke so … I agree 😂dude, you are a joke. Losing four games is losing four games no matter what your excuses.
UW on 11/2 is their last long tripThey won't this year
You domers just don't get it. Playing a Michigan and a Wisconsin and a Minnesota and a Penn State isn't the same as playing a MAC and a service academy and an ACC cupcake and another MAC.4 losses in Big 10 so far; wonder if fans still happy about changing conferences.
You domers just don't get it. Playing a Michigan and a Wisconsin and a Minnesota and a Penn State isn't the same as playing a MAC and a service academy and an ACC cupcake and another MAC.
you do understand you are an object of abject ridicule here as an absolute example of stupidity?You domers just don't get it. Playing a Michigan and a Wisconsin and a Minnesota and a Penn State isn't the same as playing a MAC and a service academy and an ACC cupcake and another MAC.
you do understand you are an object of abject ridicule here as an absolute example of stupidity?
LOLYou domers just don't get it. Playing a Michigan and a Wisconsin and a Minnesota and a Penn State isn't the same as playing a MAC and a service academy and an ACC cupcake and another MAC.
I understand that there are several posters on this forum who are intellectually overwhelmed by discussing the issue at hand and therefore resort to childish insults and name-calling. My comments are directed to the more enlightened who opt to debate and discuss in a civil manner.you do understand you are an object of abject ridicule here as an absolute example of stupidity?
Lol.You domers just don't get it. Playing a Michigan and a Wisconsin and a Minnesota and a Penn State isn't the same as playing a MAC and a service academy and an ACC cupcake and another MAC.
Ouch!you do understand you are an object of abject ridicule here as an absolute example of stupidity?
I understand that there are several posters on this forum who are intellectually overwhelmed by discussing the issue at hand and therefore resort to childish insults and name-calling. My comments are directed to the more enlightened who opt to debate and discuss in a civil manner.
lost to Minny this year.USC hasn't even had to play in the cold yet... I'm ready to watch them play Minny or Bucky in late November.
It's not just 'more money', it's going to be about $75 million/yr vs $30 million/yr in the Pac-12. Also, the Big Ten Network has been added to the Comcast basic bundle on the West Coast, something the train wreck Pac-12 Network couldn't do after twelve years of trying. So if the Big Ten gets 3-4 teams in the playoff and you add in the added BTN revenue, USC will probably get a $100 million payout from the Big Ten this year.I love it. Everyone knew this move to the Big 10 was so dumb. Yeah they get more money, but at what cost?
Minnesota lost to UNC at home bud. Minus their starting QB.You domers just don't get it. Playing a Michigan and a Wisconsin and a Minnesota and a Penn State isn't the same as playing a MAC and a service academy and an ACC cupcake and another MAC.
Lol. That annual payout hasn’t helped Purdont, and it sure isn’t helping SC in year 1It's not just 'more money', it's going to be about $75 million/yr vs $30 million/yr in the Pac-12. Also, the Big Ten Network has been added to the Comcast basic bundle on the West Coast, something the train wreck Pac-12 Network couldn't do after twelve years of trying. So if the Big Ten gets 3-4 teams in the playoff and you add in the added BTN revenue, USC will probably get a $100 million payout from the Big Ten this year.
USC's record for this year is a trivial issue. When you have decade after decade of schools in the Big Ten and SEC getting three times more revenue than colleges in the other conferences, they simply won't be able to keep up with the Joneses.
The really big bucks start this year. Additionally, the Big Ten and SEC are in cahoots to squeeze even more money out of the TV networks and the CFP, so the chasm between the P2 and the other conferences will grow even wider. USC and Purdue will be just fine.Lol. That annual payout hasn’t helped Purdont, and it sure isn’t helping SC in year 1
When you lose in South Bend to MAC crappy Northern Illinois, it isn't difficult to allow USC losing on the road to Michigan to sink in.Let this sink in - USC lost to a Michigan team that after 7 games is under a 1,000 yards passing and has committed double digit turnovers. ND still needs to play well. Time will tell and Nov. 30 is still weeks away.
And USC also lost 3 other gamesWhen you lose in South Bend to MAC crappy Northern Illinois, it isn't difficult to allow USC losing on the road to Michigan to sink in.
Not at all.
I'm assuming the douche had a snarky response? Insufferable. Just a total punk. Let me guess ND lost to NIU? OR something to that effect.And USC also lost 3 other games
ExactlyI'm assuming the douche had a snarky response? Insufferable. Just a total punk. Let me guess ND lost to NIU? OR something to that effect.
All close losses so far and a win over LSU. Who knows what additional injuries ND will have by then too.USC could be playing for a bowl game and can also ruin our season. So while we will be favored I am a bit worried.
Dork.It's not just 'more money', it's going to be about $75 million/yr vs $30 million/yr in the Pac-12. Also, the Big Ten Network has been added to the Comcast basic bundle on the West Coast, something the train wreck Pac-12 Network couldn't do after twelve years of trying. So if the Big Ten gets 3-4 teams in the playoff and you add in the added BTN revenue, USC will probably get a $100 million payout from the Big Ten this year.
USC's record for this year is a trivial issue. When you have decade after decade of schools in the Big Ten and SEC getting three times more revenue than colleges in the other conferences, they simply won't be able to keep up with the Joneses.
How are they against the SEC?4 losses in Big 10 so far; wonder if fans still happy about changing conferences.
Hey who was that SEC coach they beat? Was it Weis Jr's team?Lincoln Riley is USC's Charlie Weis.
I am curious what the Las Vegas odds will be the week of the Notre Dame-USC game.All close losses so far and a win over LSU. Who knows what additional injuries ND will have by then too.
Rinse and repeat. You didn’t harp on Kelly for his bad losses? Are you racist?When you lose in South Bend to MAC crappy Northern Illinois, it isn't difficult to allow USC losing on the road to Michigan to sink in.
Not at all.
Or Chip. Or Norvell. Or RileyRinse and repeat. You didn’t harp on Kelly for his bad losses? Are you racist?
I don’t harp on anyone until posters take shots and mock other head coaches in the business.Rinse and repeat. You didn’t harp on Kelly for his bad losses? Are you racist?
So you are racistI don’t harp on anyone until posters take shots at other head coaches in the business.
“Don’t throw stones when you live in a glass house.”
Chip was .500 at UCLA, with some really bad losses, you praise him.I don’t harp on anyone until posters take shots and mock other head coaches in the business.
“Don’t throw stones when you live in a glass house.”
Cherry picking stats to fit a narrative.Chip was .500 at UCLA, with some really bad losses, you praise him.
Lincoln is 11-9 in last 20 games. You won’t criticize.
Norvell beats your precious Kelly, then losses 6 in a row. But no blunt assessment.
MF is 6-1, 2 wins over ranked teams, and you brought up the clunker at least 50 times in 20 threads.
We can do the math…
I dont understand the logic here.I don’t harp on anyone until posters take shots and mock other head coaches in the business.
“Don’t throw stones when you live in a glass house.”
Maybe a highly paid head coach will lose Saturday, and you can sit on your couch and start a thread about it.I dont understand the logic here.
So a poster on a message board comments on another head coach from a team you don't root for, so that means you have to put down the head coach of the team you claim to be a fan of
That is a very odd thing to do and something I've never come across before.
And the guys you are standing up for haven't been as good as the head coach of your supposed team
Very odd behavior
Lol, so weak. My stats were 2-5 years.Cherry picking stats to fit a narrative.
You avoided that oneMaybe a highly paid head coach will lose Saturday, and you can sit on your couch and start a thread about it.
You’ve done it before.
But when Notre Dame loses, you disappear.
As opposed to sitting on your classroom stool?Maybe a highly paid head coach will lose Saturday, and you can sit on your couch and start a thread about it.
You’ve done it before.
But when Notre Dame loses, you disappear.