ADVERTISEMENT

Unrest in Missouri

If you've watched the video posted you will see clearly there is no discussion going to happen with that group.
Also, I think the idea of discourse regarding race relations is a narrative that is going to be present in America long after we are both dead assuming that the aliens don't land in LA and come take us all prisoners in which case America will no longer exist. The point being, the individuals in that video not being interested in discourse doesn't mean that there are not individuals on both sides of the issue that are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deadirishpoet
Sure, PR fallout doesn't have anything to do with whether or not something is right or wrong ethically or morally. It does effect what is pragmatic though.
 
Things can't be that bad at Mizzou. The main complainer / student has been a student on campus for seven years and even Michael Sam has returned to campus to get his degree. Michael Sam originally said that he was treated great and not once was he called any names or mistreated while at Missouri. Twenty four hours later he somewhat recanted his original comments. Interesting. To the poster who said Michael Sam didn't belong in this narrative, and you know who you are,.......well, Michael Sam involved himself. Not all of the football team was "in" and the basketball team never was, and never was going to be. The universities deserve exactly what they are getting because they are the ones nurturing these little spoiled children. And now their students have turned on them. That also is very funny. Mark my words. Agitators and professional victims will now work athletes on the football and basketball teams to get their way and the adults in the room will always cave.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deadirishpoet
It me. You still aren't accepting any points of view you don't disagree with. Further, Sam's story is distinguishable temporal as it ocurred 2 years ago and we'll race and sexual orientation aren't the same thing.
 
It is though, you are asking me to guess at how "the media" will respond to an action that hasn't been taken. The issues with your hypothetical are:
1. You don't identify which part of the media you are speaking of -- I get it you want to villify the "liberal media" but the media in general has extremes from both sides.

2. You don't identify how those that disagree with the white privilege narrative would voice their opinion or what the purpose of them voicing their opinion would be.

(and )

3. You don't identify the manner which they would voice their opinion.

Your pessimism regarding the media reaction suggests that one you believe the only way those disagreeing with the white privilege narrative can voice their opinion is through antagonistic rhetoric regarding race. Further, if you think the potential that something groundbreaking could happen on a college campus regarding racial discourse is BS then you must not have faith that change can happen on the issue anywhere.

1) There's a real good chance that a protest from people that don't agree w/ the white privilege narrative would never happen, for a few reasons, but if there was such a protest, I'll agree w/ you that we'd get a different slant on it based on who we're watching. Which is sad, in itself, that even the media has become so divided that we the people are forced to listen to biased views (both left & right) from the supposed experts in their fields. So I'll concede that the conservative medium (Fox & conservative talk radio) would be more lenient, but make no mistake, the rest of the media (Networks, CNN, CNBC, MSNBC) would crucify them, possibly unwarrantedly, imo.

2 & 3 are the same question & it's pretty obvious that if this actually happened, they'd be protesting against the fact that people are being forced to resign their posts & being forced to admit that their positions are all in thanks to their respective white privilege, something to that effect.

Don't know how to react to your claim about my "pessimism suggesting that the only way for these people can voice their opinion is through antagonistic rhetoric". It's a conclusion that you drew out of thin air.

As for trying to make it sound like I said that groundbreaking events on racial issues on a college campus is BS? Seriously? What I said was that your post about how the media would cozy up & say "wow, some cool things are happening" to a group that protests against the white privilege narrative is BS. Big difference.
 
My belief that the media could react that way is premised on the idea that something ground breaking could happen. Implicit in the assumption the the media would vilify protests of the white privilege narrative is the notion that any protest couldn't be rational enough that it would be viewed positively.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deadirishpoet
I would like to tip my hat to all who taken part of this subject title.
There has been a wide range of view points and differences of opinions, but with respect in the replies it shows it possible.

Good Job!
 
  • Like
Reactions: SALittleGiant513
I would like to tip my hat to all who taken part of this subject title.
There has been a wide range of view points and differences of opinions, but with respect in the replies it shows it possible.

Good Job!


I concur, dip. There's hope. SAL, we'll agree to disagree. I hope some good comes from this.
 
DIP I agree. This conversation is a nice change of pace from what can usually happen with topics like this.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT