1. The issue of when and why you go for 2 points. This is not the 1st rodeo for this HC with this matter.
But, where is it on the play list showing when and why you go for "2". Kick the point.
It is troubling that with a revamped staff, still no voice of reason? No 'hey Coach!"
2. How are plays being called? That is, what is the actual decision chain as to what play is going to be sent in. Most teams that is a clear process. But ND fans are told that it is a collective decision, that then gets the yea/nay of The HC. But are play suggestions sent down to the field OR are the play selection requests sent up to the box, with 'give me this or that' type play? Delays and getting plays off seem to be ongoing issues; and adaptive creativity seems non existent. There seems a stubborn 'this square peg is going in that round hole mentality'.
Well, percieved or imagined, 2 points factored in the loss
But, where is it on the play list showing when and why you go for "2". Kick the point.
It is troubling that with a revamped staff, still no voice of reason? No 'hey Coach!"
2. How are plays being called? That is, what is the actual decision chain as to what play is going to be sent in. Most teams that is a clear process. But ND fans are told that it is a collective decision, that then gets the yea/nay of The HC. But are play suggestions sent down to the field OR are the play selection requests sent up to the box, with 'give me this or that' type play? Delays and getting plays off seem to be ongoing issues; and adaptive creativity seems non existent. There seems a stubborn 'this square peg is going in that round hole mentality'.
Well, percieved or imagined, 2 points factored in the loss
Last edited:
