Elston's very positive comments on NYLES MORGAN's play & leadership at MLB!!!! I hope we see it this season.
Yea, I heard that and that's great news. Hopefully they have simplified the defense to help ensure our best athletes play.
Elston's very positive comments on NYLES MORGAN's play & leadership at MLB!!!! I hope we see it this season.
14-0 now.Elston's very positive comments on NYLES MORGAN's play & leadership at MLB!!!! I hope we see it this season.
Spring is always a time of hope.
Exactly you nailed it. Why in the hell wasn't he out there last year? Oh thats right, bk had to play his "Dick Butkus" type middle linebacker joe shmitt. the only one who could line people up in the right position. What a bunch of BSwho else they got? they better be talking him up! He will finally get his chance now that ... oh darn, he should have been out there last year!
typical post.sounds like Elston was wondering why Nyles was on the bench also!
Nyles vs a 'traffic cone'
When the staff makes statements like Elston's and then they go to the pidium to reiterate "it ain't the scheme"; then they are talking out both sides of their mouth! And, to extent they are blaming the players, and absolving themselves of accountability.
6 years of various players all exhibiting some degree of difficulty. And it's the players?
pers.....in my limited experience coaching I always found that "Good players made me a better Coach!" I know it needs to be a little more complex at this level BUT I do wonder why our coverage is so lacking that guys run free. Wheel routes are run in pee wees....sheesh. I am very intrigued by Studstill's apparent quick grasp of this....hope it is so!
GET BETTER!!!
To be fair Perse is spot on when Elston get up there saying that Schmidt was overwhelmed athletically but he was great at getting everyone in position, but hey, the scheme is not too hard. Double speak for sure.typical post.
remember, to paraphrase Bill Parcells, 'Kelly and Co. are the ones shopping for the groceries'
typical post.[/QUOTE
Careful don't question the "coach". Big Joe Schmitt supporter
after so many springs of false fan fodder, it is now simply, "show me"
"...VanGorder’s aggressive defensive scheme is supposed to force turnovers and generate pressure on the quarterback. It heavily relies on defensive backs to hold their own in man-to-man coverage. The results in those areas haven’t been as positive: Notre Dame recovered seven fumbles (No. 88) in 2014 and five (No. 113) last season. Its interception total dropped from 15 to nine (No. 91) last year, and it ranked 74th and 75th in team sacks...."
TOS
If nothing else^, that's a problem! < and arguing there is no problem=bigger problem!
and, yes, 348 I agree that the staff is working hard to try to get the best possible athletes. But, given the reality, they have to work with what they have. You can't put the square peg (players) in the round hole (BVG's defense).
(Schmidt must have been a round square)
JosIn 2014 Notre Dame was # 44 in defensive takeaways which was 33 spots ahead of # 77 Alabama. So your statistics about takeaways don't mean crap. Alabama had a helluva defense in 2014 and ours was poor.
Notre Dames total defense improved in 2015 over 2014 but its defensive takeaways dropped from #44 to #113.
Injuries killed the Irish defense last year. The defensive lapses during games we were running away with was also a BIG problem. Understanding of scheme should improve after three years of BVG.
Just like with Bob Diaco.
joe schmidt was the best player on defense in 2014 but because of injuries was the worst in 2015 . This drop off was a main reason for the terrible defense we had 2015after so many springs of false fan fodder, it is now simply, "show me"
"...VanGorder’s aggressive defensive scheme is supposed to force turnovers and generate pressure on the quarterback. It heavily relies on defensive backs to hold their own in man-to-man coverage. The results in those areas haven’t been as positive: Notre Dame recovered seven fumbles (No. 88) in 2014 and five (No. 113) last season. Its interception total dropped from 15 to nine (No. 91) last year, and it ranked 74th and 75th in team sacks...."
TOS
If nothing else^, that's a problem! < and arguing there is no problem=bigger problem!
and, yes, 348 I agree that the staff is working hard to try to get the best possible athletes. But, given the reality, they have to work with what they have. You can't put the square peg (players) in the round hole (BVG's defense).
(Schmidt must have been a round square)