ADVERTISEMENT

Rather have as HC? Kelly, Richt, or Dantonio?

I can. But since Weis was your preferred coach let's not get too far down that road. Never every coach can be awesome in your book while going 3-9
There's another total lie. Fatso was never a choice by me for anything other than an eating contest.
 
There was a vote by college coaches on who exactly they would want their son to play for. Bob Stoops and Mark Richt tied for first. Other high vote getters were David Shaw, Jerry Kill, Fitz, and Cutcliffe. Our own BK and Saban were nowhere to be found among those receiving votes. Interpret this vote any way you like. I don't think it means much of anything.
Just can't see Stoops. Poor graduation rate, could argue he has underperformed with all the talent he has had. What is appealing out going to OU to for him?
 
I wonder how Dantonio would do if given the advantages of Notre Dame. I think he's a better football coach than Kelly from an X's and O's standpoint and from a motivational standpoint. I look at what he did with MSU last year at Columbus. That team went into Ohio State without Connor Cook and managed to defeat the Buckeyes using two quarterbacks. I'm not sure Kelly could do the same given the same situation.
agreed. that said nd has many more obstacles in recruiting though too. dantonio would do a very good job i believe anywhere as would brian kelly. good coaches will find success period.
 
I replied to kelso about his take on porky's recruiting. You then replied like you most likely have been smoking crack.... Again, you just aren't very intelligent. It's okay.
PS I can't think of a coach that has done less with more these past 6 years than dopey....
name calling, the weapon of choice for the ignorant.
 
Just can't see Stoops. Poor graduation rate, could argue he has underperformed with all the talent he has had. What is appealing out going to OU to for him?
i think crediting or blaming head coaches for graduation rates is a total joke. its on the institution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deadirishpoet
i think crediting or blaming head coaches for graduation rates is a total joke. its on the institution.
The head coach sets the academic tone of the program, and whether they are really committed to academics or are just giving it lip service. He also has the ultimate say as to which kids the program brings in, and which ones they don't. He's the one who decides whether his program is going to be one where kids are encouraged to go into whatever field of study most interests them, or whether kids will be "strongly encouraged" to focus on the easiest majors so they can stay eligible. Almost simply by his attitude toward academics, he has a lot to do with the academic side of the program. And I'm talking his real attitude, which might differ from the one you hear about when he's standing at the podium on media day.

At a place like ND the institution plays a very big role in all of the above. That's our system. At some of the big public schools, where coaches are treated like royalty, the institution will let them set the tone for the program. You think the school President wants anything to do with going toe to toe with Bob Stoops on any issue? Or Nick Saban? Or Urban Meyer? Or any or a host of high profile coaches? We could win 50 games in a row and Father Jenkins would have no problem at all voicing his displeasure with Kelly on an issue. Our system is different from a lot of places.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cgvr
Not sure I agree with this.
i think its absurd that ANY coach gets a bonus tied to academic success. the support people and the athletes do ALL the work. coaches barely have time to see their families let alone worry about who made study table or not. coaches are hired to win games. i understand the putting the coach up front as the face of a programs athletic success but in reality they have very little to do with it. anything else is a discredit to the people who are really responsible.
 
The head coach sets the academic tone of the program, and whether they are really committed to academics or are just giving it lip service. He also has the ultimate say as to which kids the program brings in, and which ones they don't. He's the one who decides whether his program is going to be one where kids are encouraged to go into whatever field of study most interests them, or whether kids will be "strongly encouraged" to focus on the easiest majors so they can stay eligible. Almost simply by his attitude toward academics, he has a lot to do with the academic side of the program. And I'm talking his real attitude, which might differ from the one you hear about when he's standing at the podium on media day.

At a place like ND the institution plays a very big role in all of the above. That's our system. At some of the big public schools, where coaches are treated like royalty, the institution will let them set the tone for the program. You think the school President wants anything to do with going toe to toe with Bob Stoops on any issue? Or Nick Saban? Or Urban Meyer? Or any or a host of high profile coaches? We could win 50 games in a row and Father Jenkins would have no problem at all voicing his displeasure with Kelly on an issue. Our system is different from a lot of places.
i personally know a ton of coaches and don't believe what you've posted above to be true. the institution sets the bar. some have lower levels than others. coaches have little if any input or care to anyway.
 
name calling, the weapon of choice for the ignorant.

"El Stinko"
explain away....

MSU Final AP ranking

2010 14
2011 11
2012 NR
2013 3
2014 6
2015 6

Notre Dame Final AP rankings

2010 NR
2011 NR
2012 4
2013 20
2014 NR
2015 11

MSU Rivals recruiting rankings
2010 31
2011 32
2012 42
2013 47
2014 22
2015 22
2016 18

Rivals recruiting rankings ND ’10-‘16

2010 ND 14
2011 ND 10
2012 ND 20
2013 ND 3
2014 ND 11
2015 ND 11
2016 ND 13
 
  • Like
Reactions: Howard Hall 74
i personally know a ton of coaches and don't believe what you've posted above to be true. the institution sets the bar. some have lower levels than others. coaches have little if any input or care to anyway.

That's a pretty broad brush remark. What don't you believe to be true?
 
The head coach sets the academic tone of the program, and whether they are really committed to academics or are just giving it lip service. He also has the ultimate say as to which kids the program brings in, and which ones they don't. He's the one who decides whether his program is going to be one where kids are encouraged to go into whatever field of study most interests them, or whether kids will be "strongly encouraged" to focus on the easiest majors so they can stay eligible. Almost simply by his attitude toward academics, he has a lot to do with the academic side of the program. And I'm talking his real attitude, which might differ from the one you hear about when he's standing at the podium on media day.

At a place like ND the institution plays a very big role in all of the above. That's our system. At some of the big public schools, where coaches are treated like royalty, the institution will let them set the tone for the program. You think the school President wants anything to do with going toe to toe with Bob Stoops on any issue? Or Nick Saban? Or Urban Meyer? Or any or a host of high profile coaches? We could win 50 games in a row and Father Jenkins would have no problem at all voicing his displeasure with Kelly on an issue. Our system is different from a lot of places.


Echo is right on on this respect. The HC is responsible for the football program .

The institution and the student is responsible for the academics and graduation.

committing to your commitment is a life lesson that will be build or break you as a person
 
Echo is right on on this respect. The HC is responsible for the football program .

The institution and the student is responsible for the academics and graduation.

committing to your commitment is a life lesson that will be build or break you as a person

^ this is true at ND, but at many insitutions the football head coach is himself an insitution and wields great influence. This influence can and often does affect the academic effort.
The institution is of course ultimately responsible as the chain of command goes, but sometimes things get turned upside down (remember a guy named Paterno?)
 
Just can't see Stoops. Poor graduation rate, could argue he has underperformed with all the talent he has had. What is appealing out going to OU to for him?
yet notre dame has pursued him on more than one occasion.
 
i think its absurd that ANY coach gets a bonus tied to academic success. the support people and the athletes do ALL the work. coaches barely have time to see their families let alone worry about who made study table or not. coaches are hired to win games. i understand the putting the coach up front as the face of a programs athletic success but in reality they have very little to do with it. anything else is a discredit to the people who are really responsible.
You don't think Stoops or Saban can influence the graduation rate at their respective schools? Of course they can but it makes their jobs more difficult.
 
You don't think Stoops or Saban can influence the graduation rate at their respective schools? Of course they can but it makes their jobs more difficult.
i guess if they CARED to they may but they are there to win games. the other stuff is quite frankly a distraction and its why they don't bother with it. i don't know of ANY coach that was actively involved with the development and implementing of the academic support system at their respective schools.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scotchirishblood
The institution sets the bar, sure. But the HC is required to hit the bar. BTW, Kelly has focused more of his effort on this and it appears to be paying off.
 
The institution sets the bar, sure. But the HC is required to hit the bar. BTW, Kelly has focused more of his effort on this and it appears to be paying off.

ND sets the bar, but the head coach has to buy in to that philosophy. If not, then it isn't a fit and regardless of how good he is he won't be coaching here. It is what it is. That's one of the challenges.
 
"El Stinko"
explain away....

MSU Final AP ranking

2010 14
2011 11
2012 NR
2013 3
2014 6
2015 6

Notre Dame Final AP rankings

2010 NR
2011 NR
2012 4
2013 20
2014 NR
2015 11

MSU Rivals recruiting rankings
2010 31
2011 32
2012 42
2013 47
2014 22
2015 22
2016 18

Rivals recruiting rankings ND ’10-‘16

2010 ND 14
2011 ND 10
2012 ND 20
2013 ND 3
2014 ND 11
2015 ND 11
2016 ND 13


Man landed on the moon in 1969.

Has as much to do with the question I asked. When did Dantonio have his last top 3 recruiting class?
 
This is not an all or nothing proposition. The educational institution of ND clearly influences the graduation rate of its athletes, through policies and culture and support, etc... I don't know the stats, but I don't expect the outstanding graduation rate of ND football players to have changed much from Davies to Willingham to Weis to Kelly. That said, ND hires head coaches who understand and buy into this expectation and requirements, and they are a critical extension of these. I personally believe the institution plays a much larger role in influencing graduation rates than the HC, but not without the buy in and support of the HC.
 
Echo is right on on this respect. The HC is responsible for the football program .

The institution and the student is responsible for the academics and graduation.

committing to your commitment is a life lesson that will be build or break you as a person
Echo is right on on this respect. The HC is responsible for the football program .

The institution and the student is responsible for the academics and graduation.

committing to your commitment is a life lesson that will be build or break you as a person
The football program includes 100 plus students. He can make them go to class, study Hall etc.so they will get their degree.

The head football coach can very easily affect graduation rates.
If they cared about their kids, they would do this but it makes their job more difficult.
 
  • Like
Reactions: deadirishpoet
The football program includes 100 plus students. He can make them go to class, study Hall etc.so they will get their degree.

The head football coach can very easily affect graduation rates.
If they cared about their kids, they would do this but it makes their job more difficult.

That is interesting.
 
that coaches care to have much if any input in the academic support systems. its not their field of expertise.

Part of Holtz decline was attributed to a grad rate that had fallen into the 70 percentile range....

http://articles.latimes.com/1996-11-29/sports/sp-3969_1_notre-dame

"We had worked it all out," Wadsworth said. "We had had a couple of bad recruiting classes, frankly, and with some players going on early to the NFL and a couple having academic or discipline problems, the graduation rate was dropping to the mid-70s[%], which isn't acceptable here."
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT