OT Ninth Circuit Again
- Thread starter rgc7
- Start date
Here's what conservative Republican senator Thom Tillis had to say about Trump's emergency declaration (spoiler alert: he's squarely against it)....
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...ote-against-emergency/?utm_term=.0a56c8ee6f35
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...ote-against-emergency/?utm_term=.0a56c8ee6f35
Disingenuous
The data doesn't show border crossings are down
President Trump in doing what president Bush and president Obama refuse to do
Of course, times have changed, but the Constitution should not be “changed” but rather amended
to keep up with problems not foreseen by our founding fathers !
I am not into the legal jargon so I’ll bow to you on that, but I believe that, ideally, all SCJustices
Should be Constitutional Scholars like Justice Scalia was.
Once again, my opinion, is that , perhaps with the exception of RGB, the Progressives on the SC
Are not even close to be Constitutional Scholars?
to keep up with problems not foreseen by our founding fathers !
I am not into the legal jargon so I’ll bow to you on that, but I believe that, ideally, all SCJustices
Should be Constitutional Scholars like Justice Scalia was.
Once again, my opinion, is that , perhaps with the exception of RGB, the Progressives on the SC
Are not even close to be Constitutional Scholars?
We disagree on many points. But I don’t think either of us lack Compassion. Campasion is one thing but it
Is a whole different debate. A judge may have great compassion for a criminal, but he still has an obligation
To sentence that criminal for a crime !
The topic under consideration is legal or illegal immigration. Borders are there to protect our citizens and
National sovereignty.
Is a whole different debate. A judge may have great compassion for a criminal, but he still has an obligation
To sentence that criminal for a crime !
The topic under consideration is legal or illegal immigration. Borders are there to protect our citizens and
National sovereignty.
They all are constitutional scholars. You're acting like four of the Supreme Court justices were working a cash register before they got appointed.
Why do you suppose every congressperson representing territory along the southern border opposes funding for building a wall?
I understand his concerns and to be honest president trumps emergency action is an emergency that could of been handled differently. There was money to be gotten without doing it this way other than to show his supporters and his adversaries he is serious about border security.
Something the left have supported not so long ago but now have evolved into something else.
Billions of dollars taken away from the citizens of this nation. Social structures over burdened.
It a shame the left defend the non citizens over the actual citizens of the country
Yes.
I have a hard time thinking that anyone on the Supreme Court - including those who I disagree with - is not considered a constitutional scholar.
I'm sorry I did Border patrol agents are the people recommending the wall.
They are the ones in the field
Politicians are not. Why do you believe they are not listening to the people in the field?.......politics
I'll take a crack at this one.
Illegal border crossings are down, so there's no need for a $30 billion boondoggle. 21st century technology is a better solution.
The Great Wall of Trump, if built in the manner he promised, would be a national symbol that is completely at-odds with the Statue of Liberty.
The Wall would do next-to-nothing to stop the most pressing border issues, which are the overwhelming number of asylum claims and the influx of heroin, the vast majority of which comes through legal ports of entry.
The Wall would require the government seizing thousands of acres of land from property owners on the border. Texans don't cotton to the government taking their land.
I specifically stated congresspersons. You didn't respond to my question but created your own response.
Agree with all this, and the elephant in the room that conservatives won't address is that Trump promised "Mexico will pay for it!!!!" Time and again at his rallies, there was the chant "And who's going to pay for it?" audience "MEXICO!!!!!"
Appeal to authority
Backatcha
“It should be the policy of the United States to support efforts to remove the regime headed by Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq and to promote the emergence of a democratic government to replace that regime.”
3 bill 1 deodorant 3 home bernie sanders
Schumer says flatly that “Illegal immigration is wrong, plain and simple,” and Obama says that “we simply cannot allow people to pour into the United States undetected, undocumented, unchecked."
“Now, on the question of limiting population: as you know the Japanese have been doing it very vigorously, through abortion, which I think would be repugnant to all Americans.”
President Kennedy
Is this about the left forcing Oprah to run or is this about the B movie actor that became president and dismantled the ussr that leftist "intellectuals" like artie schlesinger stated as a matter of fact ..."those in the United States who think the Soviet Union is on the verge of economic and social collapse” are “wishful thinkers who are only kidding themselves.”
Whoooops
Yeah stupid poet only people that have never been to duh border should decide what is deemed an emergency rather than those that have made a career of enforcing law on duh border
In other news I want the receptionist at the dentist office to fix my tooths rather than the DDS
do you feel the same way about climatologists on climate change and medical doctors on the horrors of gun violence ?
That's awesome but
Define illegal immigration
Define legal immigration
Are they the same
Apples aren't oranges
Define illegal immigration
Define legal immigration
It is fallacious to compare a symbol of legal legal legal immigration to a barrier that is meant to prevent illegal illegal illegal immigration
Apples are not oranges and it's dishonest to pretend they mean or by definition mean the same thing or are synonymous
Which climatologists
Judith Curry ?
Medical doctors that blame an inanimate object for what exactly and are they doctors that think a baby is just a clump of cells
Speaking of ipcc or using your red herring / appeal to a faux authority
What does this mean to you
Section 14.2.2.2:
“In sum, a strategy must recognize what is possible. In climate research and modelling, we should recognize that we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore that the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible.”
What does this mean to you
Section 14.2.2.2:
“In sum, a strategy must recognize what is possible. In climate research and modelling, we should recognize that we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore that the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible.”
You do know that we already have several hundred miles of border barrier now, right? This is not exactly a new phenomenon, or even a conservative one. Border security and using barriers in certain strategic locations USED TO BE a fairly bi-partisan issue.
And the Statue of Liberty is NOT a symbol of people sneaking into the country illegally.
You have to love the hypocrisy of leftists
Ignoring what the border patrol or dhs states per their personal experience
But the words from a person with a (D) by their name is to be taken as scripture that's never even been to the border
I'd rather receive driving tips from Ted Kennedy, how to keep the white sheets white by robert KKK Byrd, tax advise from charlie rangel, how to interpret the Constitution by the president/constitutional professor that had the worst supreme court record ever recorded
Ignoring what the border patrol or dhs states per their personal experience
But the words from a person with a (D) by their name is to be taken as scripture that's never even been to the border
I'd rather receive driving tips from Ted Kennedy, how to keep the white sheets white by robert KKK Byrd, tax advise from charlie rangel, how to interpret the Constitution by the president/constitutional professor that had the worst supreme court record ever recorded
So where is the compassion? Under Trump, the time it takes to gain citizenship has increased from 6 months to 2 years. So let's talk about a sample family - a family of 4 from Honduras. They are attempting to immigrate to America to protect their children from violent gangs. They walk to the American border but are denied asylum because...well, because that's how we do things these days. This family doesn't have the money to hire an attorney so must try and navigate the immigration laws themselves...for 2 years. What are the supposed to do for those 2 years?
But no, compassion isn't really the thing to talk about here. We're here to talk about the law and how this Honduran family might steal our jobs or rape our women. Yeah, its all about law and order. Good luck sleeping on that.
Look at their biographies...all nine justices are eminently qualified, although I admit to having to clench my teeth as I write that about Clarence Thomas.
I'm surprised he wasn't able to get a Coca Cola endorsement after his performance during the hearings.
