Willie Taggart? He's 40-45 for his career with one 10-win season. I'd be willing to bet he was not at the top of their wish list. Not exactly a home run hire.
Good luck with that.
Good luck with that.
Willie Taggart? He's 40-45 for his career with one 10-win season. I'd be willing to bet he was not at the top of their wish list. Not exactly a home run hire.
Good luck with that.
Willie Taggart? He's 40-45 for his career with one 10-win season. I'd be willing to bet he was not at the top of their wish list. Not exactly a home run hire.
Good luck with that.
You're right; he may do well there. But, he did what he could where he was at but he also played a much lighter schedule with those players and he still had a losing record. Now he's in the big time.What is to say that this will not be a "home run" hire? He did well where he was at and with what he could probably get -- now, he is going to a better situation, with an opportunity to really compete for the elite kids.
You're right; he may do well there. But, he did what he could where he was at but he also played a much lighter schedule with those players and he still had a losing record. Now he's in the big time.
I feel this is a "change just for the sake of making a change" hire. You cannot just keep changing coaches and hope what hires works out.
I feel that Kelly needs to be replaced, but it has to be done with the right guy. If ND hires somebody else and that doesn't work out, you can't keep changing coaches every 3-4 years or otherwise you run the risk of staying right where you're at. You've gained nothing.
WUT?A question? When was the last time we were a perennial power? How bout those hires? Realistically ask yourself when was the last time in consecutive years you "KNEW" you were going to beat a top 10 team? I knew under Holtz we could play with anyone! We played admirably against Clemson last year.
If you were to ask me is Clemson elite? Absolutely. Having said that it's OSU, Bama then the field. That is the sad truth and really inarguable.
Dont get me wrong they are beatable, but you better bring your lunch!
There was a time that ND was mentioned in the same sentence!
You're right; he may do well there. But, he did what he could where he was at but he also played a much lighter schedule with those players and he still had a losing record. Now he's in the big time.
I feel this is a "change just for the sake of making a change" hire. You cannot just keep changing coaches and hope what hires works out.
I feel that Kelly needs to be replaced, but it has to be done with the right guy. If ND hires somebody else and that doesn't work out, you can't keep changing coaches every 3-4 years or otherwise you run the risk of staying right where you're at. You've gained nothing.
Willie Taggart? He's 40-45 for his career with one 10-win season. I'd be willing to bet he was not at the top of their wish list. Not exactly a home run hire.
Good luck with that.
You make a good comment -- "change just for the sake of change" -- Right now, I think that is where many ND fans are -- they want change and want it now -- does not matter who is it. Granted, Kelly F***** up this year, terribly, and over the years, some of his in-game decisions/adjustments (if that is what you want to call them) have left many people perplexed. But, outside of a few (Herman, Strong), there really are not a lot of viable candidates out there (I personally think Fleck needs another year at Western Michigan).
What do I know -- I, like many others around here, sit and type on a key board to express our anger and outrage over the situation. It is the ones making the big $$$ who get to make those decisions on who stays, goes and when that all occurs.[/QUOTEYep! And they've screwed it up since Holtz - hence the anger on this board.