ADVERTISEMENT

ND/USC rivalry

ND/ Michigan restarted in 1978. Rick Leach was the QB for those who remember. Irish lost at home. The following year in Ann Arbor the Irish got revenge and won 12-10. I just want to say “ thank you Bob Crable”. 1980 , Harry Oliver for the win at the end of the game with a 51 yard field goal. The rivalry was definitely on ! Most of the games were real battles. A few games over the years were lopsided. It really was intense. I agree with 4-4-3 that ND/Michigan is really a natural rivalry. SC / ND has a different feel. I think , at least for me there was always a mutual respect between both schools. The Michigan game? Well let’s just say the Wolverine’s have a strong disdain for the Irish.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4-4-3 and tbonesays
ND/ Michigan restarted in 1978. Rick Leach was the QB for those who remember. Irish lost at home. The following year in Ann Arbor the Irish got revenge and won 12-10. I just want to say “ thank you Bob Crable”. 1980 , Harry Oliver for the win at the end of the game with a 51 yard field goal. The rivalry was definitely on ! Most of the games were real battles. A few games over the years were lopsided. It really was intense. I agree with 4-4-3 that ND/Michigan is really a natural rivalry. SC / ND has a different feel. I think , at least for me there was always a mutual respect between both schools. The Michigan game? Well let’s just say the Wolverine’s have a strong disdain for the Irish.
Notre Dame, IMO, will never play Michigan annually. Far Far too much deep animosity between the two schools.

And that animosity one could argue is why Notre Dame never joined the Big 10, and never will.
 
Notre Dame, IMO, will never play Michigan annually. Far Far too much deep animosity between the two schools.

And that animosity one could argue is why Notre Dame never joined the Big 10, and never will.
Well they did play annually for many years. But I do think you’re right. At this point , I do not think there will be a long series again between both universities
 
The only real edge USC has had is in keeping ND from UNDEFEATED AND/OR NC SEASONS.

USC victories or, in one case, a tie, have -- IN THE LAST GAME OF THE SEASON -- cost ND undefeated, untied seasons -- and, most likely, NC's -- in 38, 48, 64 and 70. And you could argue a possible NC -- given that ND was a one loss team up until that game -- in 74 as in went on to beat Bama that year in the Orange Bowl, making it two years in a row that it kept the TIDE from an NC by beating it in a bowl game.

And, ironically, in that 74 season, ND actually helped USC win the NC twice. Not only by letting itself get taken out by USC in the final game, 55-24, after having led 24-0, but by also taking out Bama.

At the same time, ND failed under the same circumstances in 62 and 74 to keep USC from winning the title.

On the postive side, USC failed in the year's final game to keep ND from winning NC's in 66 and 88, while also failing to keep it from an undefeated regular season in 2012.

Without all of this RICH HISTORY, the rivalry would not be what it'a been.

HEARTBREAKING LOSSES AND GUTSY WINS AT CRITICAL MOMENTS HAVE BEEN CENTRAL TO IT AS BOTH TEAMS HAVE OFTEN BEEN NC CONTENDERS.
Well said. If usc wants to bail. Let em go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4-4-3
I always considered it FIERCER than the USC rivalry.

It wasn't the BYPRODUCT of two coaches' wives chatting but rather UM's SUCCESSFUL attempt to keep ND out of the BIG TEN. In those days, there was a RELIGIOUS/NATIVIST element to it as well. WASPS versus PAPISTS. And on the UM side, evidence of BLATANT BIGOTRY. Ironically, though, UM's argument against ND entering the BIG TEN centered on its being an INTELLECTUAL LIGHTWEIGHT that admitted RINGERS like George Gipp.

Frankly, I think UM is ND's MOST LOGICAL MAIN RIVAL. And I don't think that UM's rivalry with OSU detracts from that. UM still considers ND SOMEHOW "OTHER" -- THERE'S AN ARROGANCE -- and is constantly looking to assert its SUPERIORTY. Even though the ACADEMICS ARGUMENT went out the window DECADES AGO.
It definitely definitely seems like there is way more BAD BLOOD.

I love it. Hope we see them in the playoffs
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4-4-3
Bruce Feldman made a really good case today as to why USC needs this game more in the long run, and may be sacrificing the future to pick up a few cheap W's because it has a coach that has not proved he can create a winning culture. That is highly paraphrased.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NDSMC78
Bruce Feldman made a really good case today as to why USC needs this game more in the long run, and may be sacrificing the future to pick up a few cheap W's because it has a coach that has not proved he can create a winning culture. That is highly paraphrased.

USC feels pressured because with the nine game conference schedule, and talk of adding annual Big Ten vs SEC games, that only leaves two slots open for other games. Keeping the ND series would drop them down to just one open slot per year.

ND wouldn't want to be locked into having only one open slot to schedule every year, either.
 
USC feels pressured because with the nine game conference schedule, and talk of adding annual Big Ten vs SEC games, that only leaves two slots open for other games. Keeping the ND series would drop them down to just one open slot per year.

ND wouldn't want to be locked into having only one open slot to schedule every year, either.
moron alert
 
  • Like
Reactions: sluggo69
Thanks. I'm enjoying the positive dialogue. Good stuff.

As for our friend, I DON'T HAVE TO LISTEN TO HIM as I CAN'T as his stuff DOES NOT APPEAR ON MY SCREEN.

Whoever invented the IGNORE BUTTON was a GENIUS!
Moron alert.
 
USC feels pressured because with the nine game conference schedule, and talk of adding annual Big Ten vs SEC games, that only leaves two slots open for other games. Keeping the ND series would drop them down to just one open slot per year.

ND wouldn't want to be locked into having only one open slot to schedule every year, either.
So that's the reason. Now they have to play LSU every year, which it must be said they're off to a good start in that budding rivalry. Still, you gotta be strong. Probably doesn't matter, because if they switch to the 14 team 'access' playoff format, ND is probably not going to be able to stay independent for too much longer, and will join the Big Ten, and then USC is back on the schedule! So they just have to hold out for a few more seasons.
 
USC feels pressured because with the nine game conference schedule, and talk of adding annual Big Ten vs SEC games, that only leaves two slots open for other games. Keeping the ND series would drop them down to just one open slot per year.

ND wouldn't want to be locked into having only one open slot to schedule every year, either.
Moron alert.
 
So that's the reason. Now they have to play LSU every year, which it must be said they're off to a good start in that budding rivalry. Still, you gotta be strong. Probably doesn't matter, because if they switch to the 14 team 'access' playoff format, ND is probably not going to be able to stay independent for too much longer, and will join the Big Ten, and then USC is back on the schedule! So they just have to hold out for a few more seasons.
I love how stupid you are
your insane rants always make me laugh
 
  • Like
Reactions: NDinNJ
So that's the reason. Now they have to play LSU every year, which it must be said they're off to a good start in that budding rivalry. Still, you gotta be strong. Probably doesn't matter, because if they switch to the 14 team 'access' playoff format, ND is probably not going to be able to stay independent for too much longer, and will join the Big Ten, and then USC is back on the schedule! So they just have to hold out for a few more seasons.

With the current structure of the CFP, there’s no reason and no incentive for Notre Dame to join a conference.

Everything is fine just the way things stand right now
 
With the current structure of the CFP, there’s no reason and no incentive for Notre Dame to join a conference.

Everything is fine just the way things stand right now
I think that's totally wrong. Are you not familiar with some of the proposed expanded playoff formats? I believe pundits and the cognoscenti refer to it as the 'access model', similar to European CL qualification. And one of the leading proposed scenarios comprise 14 teams, and no committee, no at large bids. Other than one spot out of the 14, that ND will have the opportunity to qualify for. And the one I heard kicked around would involve a play in game. They don't just get the spot automatically if they hit performance benchmarks or whatnot, and if anything they would need to hit those benchmarks just to qualify for the play-in game. And the other 13 berths are meted out to the conferences 'automatically'. Big Ten/SEC get four each. Big 12/ACC get 2 each. And one for the G5.

And that is an obviously terrible arrangement for ND. As opposed to being in the Big Ten, where they could get any of the four bids, as well as, assuming that final 14th spot would devolve into a traditional at large bid with ND no longer needing to be catered to as an indie, to whoever the remaining top team from any conference, then ND could qualify for that as well. Or maybe they would give the ACC or Big !2 three spots, and thus no at larges at all. So five possible spots, or at least four, as against just one. That's like a nightmare scenario for ND. No at large bids at all, or only one out of an entire expanded field. I would have to think that would be an untenable state of play for ND, and if it comes to pass our football 'independence' would be at an end.
 
And that is an obviously terrible arrangement for ND. As opposed to being in the Big Ten, where they could get any of the four bids, as well as, assuming that final 14th spot would devolve into a traditional at large bid with ND no longer needing to be catered to as an indie, to whoever the remaining top team from any conference, then ND could qualify for that as well.
It's so obviously terrible, right. Which is why I do not think that ESPN would ever sign it without an ND clause addressing that problem.
 
I think that's totally wrong. Are you not familiar with some of the proposed expanded playoff formats? I believe pundits and the cognoscenti refer to it as the 'access model', similar to European CL qualification. And one of the leading proposed scenarios comprise 14 teams, and no committee, no at large bids. Other than one spot out of the 14, that ND will have the opportunity to qualify for. And the one I heard kicked around would involve a play in game. They don't just get the spot automatically if they hit performance benchmarks or whatnot, and if anything they would need to hit those benchmarks just to qualify for the play-in game. And the other 13 berths are meted out to the conferences 'automatically'. Big Ten/SEC get four each. Big 12/ACC get 2 each. And one for the G5.

And that is an obviously terrible arrangement for ND. As opposed to being in the Big Ten, where they could get any of the four bids, as well as, assuming that final 14th spot would devolve into a traditional at large bid with ND no longer needing to be catered to as an indie, to whoever the remaining top team from any conference, then ND could qualify for that as well. Or maybe they would give the ACC or Big !2 three spots, and thus no at larges at all. So five possible spots, or at least four, as against just one. That's like a nightmare scenario for ND. No at large bids at all, or only one out of an entire expanded field. I would have to think that would be an untenable state of play for ND, and if it comes to pass our football 'independence' would be at an end.
Moron alert.
 
It's so obviously terrible, right. Which is why I do not think that ESPN would ever sign it without an ND clause addressing that problem.
What do you mean a ND clause, I just explained what the ND exception is, at least according to my understanding of this proposal. A lone at large bid, that wouldn't even come with automatic qualification. ND would have to play in, I believe on CCG weekend, and they'd have to qualify for the play-in game. So yes, if you mean that ND in this particular format wouldn't be locked out altogether than yes that's true. But it would be hardly ideal. Couldn't be much worse.
 
I think that's totally wrong. Are you not familiar with some of the proposed expanded playoff formats? I believe pundits and the cognoscenti refer to it as the 'access model', similar to European CL qualification. And one of the leading proposed scenarios comprise 14 teams, and no committee, no at large bids. Other than one spot out of the 14, that ND will have the opportunity to qualify for. And the one I heard kicked around would involve a play in game. They don't just get the spot automatically if they hit performance benchmarks or whatnot, and if anything they would need to hit those benchmarks just to qualify for the play-in game. And the other 13 berths are meted out to the conferences 'automatically'. Big Ten/SEC get four each. Big 12/ACC get 2 each. And one for the G5.

And that is an obviously terrible arrangement for ND. As opposed to being in the Big Ten, where they could get any of the four bids, as well as, assuming that final 14th spot would devolve into a traditional at large bid with ND no longer needing to be catered to as an indie, to whoever the remaining top team from any conference, then ND could qualify for that as well. Or maybe they would give the ACC or Big !2 three spots, and thus no at larges at all. So five possible spots, or at least four, as against just one. That's like a nightmare scenario for ND. No at large bids at all, or only one out of an entire expanded field. I would have to think that would be an untenable state of play for ND, and if it comes to pass our football 'independence' would be at an end.
“ Proposed” ? By whom !

That’s strictly speculation

My statement stands, based on the current structure of the CFP, there is absolutely no reason for Notre Dame to join a conference !
 
What do you mean a ND clause, I just explained what the ND exception is, at least according to my understanding of this proposal. A lone at large bid, that wouldn't even come with automatic qualification. ND would have to play in, I believe on CCG weekend, and they'd have to qualify for the play-in game. So yes, if you mean that ND in this particular format wouldn't be locked out altogether than yes that's true. But it would be hardly ideal. Couldn't be much worse.
Moron alert.
 
I think that's totally wrong. Are you not familiar with some of the proposed expanded playoff formats? I believe pundits and the cognoscenti refer to it as the 'access model', similar to European CL qualification. And one of the leading proposed scenarios comprise 14 teams, and no committee, no at large bids. Other than one spot out of the 14, that ND will have the opportunity to qualify for. And the one I heard kicked around would involve a play in game. They don't just get the spot automatically if they hit performance benchmarks or whatnot, and if anything they would need to hit those benchmarks just to qualify for the play-in game. And the other 13 berths are meted out to the conferences 'automatically'. Big Ten/SEC get four each. Big 12/ACC get 2 each. And one for the G5.

And that is an obviously terrible arrangement for ND. As opposed to being in the Big Ten, where they could get any of the four bids, as well as, assuming that final 14th spot would devolve into a traditional at large bid with ND no longer needing to be catered to as an indie, to whoever the remaining top team from any conference, then ND could qualify for that as well. Or maybe they would give the ACC or Big !2 three spots, and thus no at larges at all. So five possible spots, or at least four, as against just one. That's like a nightmare scenario for ND. No at large bids at all, or only one out of an entire expanded field. I would have to think that would be an untenable state of play for ND, and if it comes to pass our football 'independence' would be at an end.
can you get any dumber? had not thought it was possible.
as long as we have the season record we are in. with our schedule, we will get a high seed. You are so fixated on a conference you are blind to reality.
Notre Dame will never have to worry about getting a good seed as long as we have the record.
 
What do you mean a ND clause, I just explained what the ND exception is, at least according to my understanding of this proposal. A lone at large bid, that wouldn't even come with automatic qualification. ND would have to play in, I believe on CCG weekend, and they'd have to qualify for the play-in game. So yes, if you mean that ND in this particular format wouldn't be locked out altogether than yes that's true. But it would be hardly ideal. Couldn't be much worse.
you make morons look like geniuses
 
ratings drive the playoffs. MONEY DRIVES THE PLAYOFFS. Nothing else matters. Which means the controlling powers will never leave out a team that will get ratings and a winning Notre Dame team gets those. The attention Notre Dame attracts.

So there are no plausible ways we get left out as long as we have the season record

morons that claim otherwise are too stupid to get around corners and through open doors
 
ratings drive the playoffs. MONEY DRIVES THE PLAYOFFS. Nothing else matters. Which means the controlling powers will never leave out a team that will get ratings and a winning Notre Dame team gets those. The attention Notre Dame attracts.

So there are no plausible ways we get left out as long as we have the season record

morons that claim otherwise are too stupid to get around corners and through open doors
Okay, you are not making any kind of even vaguely compelling argument in defense of the inevitable certainly of ND's indefinitely continued independence. In these proposals ND is being taken care of. There is a single slot left open for them. So that's a moot point. The question will be is the relative pittance they have been afforded be considered good enough, by ND, so that they decline to join a conference even in spite of this less than favorable scenario.

My personal feeling is that it might not be. And that 'money', in some abstract sense, is going to be enough to inspire whichever powers that be settle on the final terms and dispensation, to be like, let's just give ND whatever they want. Whatever ND demands, we'll make it happen, we'll acquiesce. We need them in that playoff every year unless they literally have a losing record, because we need the money, even if they steadfastly refuse to join a conference, and they will be upset and sad if they don't get to be in the playoff every year or something, I don't even know what we're talking about, this is nonsense. The only important upshot is that being an independent is not where you want to be if you want to make the playoff with this sort of qualification format, or have the most chances to make it in on an annual basis. And that's just reality. ND can't win their own conference consisting of a single team.
 
Okay, you are not making any kind of even vaguely compelling argument in defense of the inevitable certainly of ND's indefinitely continued independence. In these proposals ND is being taken care of. There is a single slot left open for them. So that's a moot point. The question will be is the relative pittance they have been afforded be considered good enough, by ND, so that they decline to join a conference even in spite of this less than favorable scenario.

My personal feeling is that it might not be. And that 'money', in some abstract sense, is going to be enough to inspire whichever powers that be settle on the final terms and dispensation, to be like, let's just give ND whatever they want. Whatever ND demands, we'll make it happen, we'll acquiesce. We need them in that playoff every year unless they literally have a losing record, because we need the money, even if they steadfastly refuse to join a conference, and they will be upset and sad if they don't get to be in the playoff every year or something, I don't even know what we're talking about, this is nonsense. The only important upshot is that being an independent is not where you want to be if you want to make the playoff with this sort of qualification format, or have the most chances to make it in on an annual basis. And that's just reality. ND can't win their own conference consisting of a single team.
“ proposals”. ?

Name the people making those proposals, along with exactly what they are proposing
 
“ proposals”. ?

Name the people making those proposals, along with exactly what they are proposing
I'm not going to do that. They exist, they're out there, and everyone in the CFB world is talking about them. And they could very well come to pass, as early as 2026. And then ND would have a choice to make.
 
If ND were a perennial top 5 team every year , then I think they could stay independent for as long as they want. However , history says that is not usually the case. Freeman could take them on a really good ride depending on how long he stays. But coaches, like players come and go. ND could easily be mediocre for a while. Right now , I’d say they have been top ten consistently overall since 2017. That’s pretty good. But if they fall back with 7-5 or 8-4 type seasons, then pressure really mounts to join a conference. They are walking a tightrope so to speak. As much as I would love ND to remain independent, I do believe they will have no choice and eventually join a conference. The only other scenario would be splitting the country up into regions as I stated in another post. But that is only me speculating. We shall see how this all plays out.
 
I'm not going to do that. They exist, they're out there, and everyone in the CFB world is talking about them. And they could very well come to pass, as early as 2026. And then ND would have a choice to make.
If the last 100 years are any indication, ND will remain independent in football.
 
I'm not going to do that. They exist, they're out there, and everyone in the CFB world is talking about them. And they could very well come to pass, as early as 2026. And then ND would have a choice to make.
You can't even grasp basic math you moron. The only proposal that include auto bids, expands the playoffs to 16 teams. 4 auto bids each for Big10 and SEC, 2 auto bids each for ACC and Big12, and one G5 autobid equals 13 auto bids, leaving 3 at-large bids.

From what I've read they are actually moving away from this proposal and going to a 5 + 11 format. 5 conference champions get auto bids with 11 at-large bids. Either way, Notre Dame at 10-2 gets included in a 16 team playoff period.

You can't fix stupid and that's what Savvy is.

"Under the 16-team proposal, eight auto-bids from the Big Ten and SEC exist — four from each league — along with two ACC qualifiers, two Big 12, one Group of Five and three at-large teams."

 
  • Like
Reactions: tbonesays
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT