Let’s take a closer look at the Clinton incident.You are too much. Quit with the straw man arguments. No, I don't know anything about Tucker's marital situation. Nor do I care. Nor is it any of my business. Nor am I "passing judgement (sic)" on the man. Nor did I condemn him. I merely commented on what I thought MSU would do in the situation. And guess what: my prediction was correct!
What consenting adults do in private is their own business in most circumstances, but I do not agree with that as an absolute statement. For example, were you ok with Bill Clinton getting a BJ in the oval office by a star-struck intern that was half his age? I didn't think it was an impeachable offense, but I certainly thought it was beneath the dignity of the Office of the President of the United States. But I guess you were OK with that?
I have no issue with the age disparity.
You may recall that an Air Force officer was demoted for having sex with a subordinate when Hillary was shouting from the rooftops that that constituted inappropriate conduct and an abuse of power. I’m ambivalent on that issue because it seems to preclude a man and woman from flirting and engaging if one of the parties holds a higher rank
Tarnishing the dignity of the office, yeah, I agree with that, but then I thought about JFK who I admired, sneaking women into the White House for sex. LBJ did the same.
I think that the age disparity, the fact that she was an intern and that it took place in the Oral Office combined to make it offensive.
Had his choice been Victoria Secret models or Hollywood stars at another location it wouldn’t have drawn the same attention.
Did MSU get it right ?
Or is this Duke all over again ?
I don’t know !
I just know that one should be presumed innocent until proven guilty and that they’re entitled to Due Process